Different Effects of Three Recruitment Maneuvers on the Lung Heterogeneity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DEOTRMOARDS)

March 12, 2015 updated by: Jianfeng Xie, Southeast University, China

Evaluation of Different Effects of Three Recruitment Maneuvers on the Lung Heterogeneity of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the common disease in clinical, which pathophysiology is a lot of alveolar collapse and heterogeneity. Recruitment maneuver is one of the important therapy for improvement of this phenomenon. The previous research focuses on the hemodynamic and oxygenation effect of recruitment maneuver on the lung of ARDS. Seldom investigators try to find the intuitive change of heterogeneity when recruitment maneuver is implemented. In this study, the investigators compare three recruitment maneuvers on the lung heterogeneity of ARDS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the common disease in clinical,which pathophysiology is a lot of alveolar collapse and heterogeneity. Recruitment maneuver is one of the important therapy for improvement of this phenomenon. The previous research focuses on the hemodynamic and oxygenation effect of recruitment maneuver on the lung of ARDS. Seldom investigators try to find the intuitive change of heterogeneity when recruitment maneuver is implemented. In this study, the investigators compare three recruitment maneuvers on the lung heterogeneity of ARDS.

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been introduced as a true bedside and radiation-free technique which provides information on heterogeneity. The investigators compare effects of three recruitment maneuvers on lung heterogeneity before recruitment maneuver and do the same thing after three recruitment maneuvers.

Ninety-three patients with ARDS will be enrolled . These patients are treated routinly.They need to recept a time of ZEEP (PEEP is zero cmH2O)for ten respiratory cycles before RM(recruitment maneuvers).Implemente a kind of RM at random immediately after ZEEP,Then make the ventilator same as before ZEEP.The EIT images ,blood gases and hemodynamic variables will be examined as beseline between ZEEP and RM.Completion of this kind of RM lies that the P/F of blood gases 3 minutes after RM achieves (1) PO2/FiO2>400mmHg or (2)PO2/FiO2+PCO2 ≥ 400mmHg(FiO2=1),(3)the difference between this index before lung recriument and after lung recriument PO2/FiO2<5%.In addition,3 minutes after RM,compare the indexs above between three methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are severe or moderate ARDS
  • Patients who have signed ICF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are younger than 18 years old or older than 75 years old
  • Patients whose vital signs are unstable
  • Patients who are in other clinical trails
  • Patients who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SI recruitment
Compare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min
Experimental: IP recruitment
Compare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min
Experimental: PCV recruitment
Compare the effect of three recruitment maneuvers before and after recruitment maneuvers is implemented,PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min
SI continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) held at 40 cm H2O for 40 secs.
Incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a fixed peak pressure (IP), PEEP increased in 5 cm H2O increments (allowing 30 secs/step) from a baseline PEEP of post-trial to 40 cm H2O while decreasing tidal volume to limit peak inspiratory pressure to 40 cm H2O. After CPAP of 40 cm H2O was held for 30 secs, PEEP was decremented in 5-cm H2O steps to the post-RM PEEP setting, while increasing tidal volume toward the baseline value of 10 mL/kg (as the 40 cm H2O peak pressure limit allowed).
PCV peak pressure = 40 cm H2O, inspiratory to expiratory ratio = 1:2, and PEEP level = 15cm H2O for 2 min

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
oxygenation (improvement of oxygenation)
Time Frame: improvement of oxygenation 3 minutes after lung recruiment
detection of index 3 minutes after lung recruiment (1) PO2/FiO2>400mmHg or (2)PO2/FiO2+PCO2 ≥ 400mmHg(FiO2=1),(3)the difference between this index before lung recriument and after lung recriument PO2/FiO2<5%
improvement of oxygenation 3 minutes after lung recruiment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yingzi Huang, southeast univerity, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on SI recruitment

Subscribe