- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02393196
Colloid Preload Versus Colloid Coload During Cesarean Deliveries
November 16, 2015 updated by: Aysun Afife Kar, Sifa University
Colloid Preload Versus Colloid Coload in Preventing Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Cesarean Section Deliveries: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Study
The investigators aimed to compare the methods colloid preloading and colloid coloading in terms of the incidence of maternal hypotension and impacts on neonatal outcomes.
The second aim while planning the present study is to identify the method of the lowest adverse event for mother and infant and the simplest approach for the clinician.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Detailed Description
Spinal anesthesia (SA) is currently the most preferred method of anesthesia in elective cesarean deliveries.
However, SA causes maternal hypotension by decreasing systemic vascular resistance over sympathetic blockade.
Maternal hypotension can lead to serious adverse events both in mother and in fetus: fetal hypoxia and acidosis occur due to decreased uterine blood flow, whereas the mother may experience vertigo, nausea, vomiting, alteration in consciousness, cardiovascular collapse and arrest.
Today, various strategies have been suggested for the prevention of maternal hypotension.
Of these strategies, the most critical ones are fluid load before spinal anesthesia (preloading) or rapid fluid load just after spinal anesthesia (coloading) and the use of vasopressor agent.
The fluids used for this purpose include crystalloids and colloids.
Comparative studies performed with colloid preloading, colloid coloading and crystalloid coloading indicated that the incidence of hypotension decreased similarly with no significant difference determined between the methods of fluid loading.
Researchers defended necessity of using vasopressor agent together with fluid loading methods.
In daily routine; however, the investigators observe that the incidence of hypotension is lower in the patients that undergo colloid preloading as compared to the patients that undergo colloid coloading or crystalloid coloading.
The investigators therefore aimed to compare the methods colloid preloading and colloid coloading in terms of the incidence of maternal hypotension and impacts on neonatal outcomes.
In the present study, the investigators aimed to use 6% HES 130/0.4
(Voluven ®), which is the newer generation colloid solution.
The other aim while planning the present study is to identify the method of the lowest adverse event for mother and infant and the simplest approach for the clinician.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
200
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Aysun Afife Kar, MD
- Phone Number: +905326521313
- Email: aaysunkar@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
İzmir, Turkey, 35100
- Recruiting
- Şifa Üniversitesi, Basmane Hastanesi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
- Height ≥ 150 cm and ≤ 180 cm
- Weight > 50 kg and < 100 kg
Exclusion Criteria:
- Gestational age > 37 weeks
- Multiple pregnancies
- Fetal distress
- Preeclampsia
- Cardiovascular disease and diabetes
- Hematological problems
- Local infection at intervention site
- Abnormal coagulation tests
- Anticoagulant use
- Starch allergy
- Height < 150 cm and > 180 cm
- Weight < 50 kg and > 100 kg
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group Preloading (Group P)
Group Preloading (Group P): 500 mL hydroxyethyl starch (6% HES 130/0.4)
(Voluven®; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) will be infused via a pressure infusion system at a maximum speed as possible before spinal anesthesia.
|
Before spinal anesthesia
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Group Coloading (Group C)
Group Coloading (Group C): After the patients have been monitored, spinal anesthesia will be performed.
Recognizing the cerebrospinal fluid, 500 mL hydroxyethyl starch (%6 HES 130/0.4)
(Voluven®; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) will be infused via a pressure infusion system at a maximum speed as possible.
|
Just after spinal anesthesia
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maternal hypotension.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Maternal hypotension will be defined as at least a single administration of ephedrine within the period from induction of SA to the delivery (umbilical cord clamping).
After spinal anesthesia, SAP will be measured and recorded at every minute until birth and every three minutes thereafter.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Incidence of severe hypotension.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Incidence of severe hypotension (SAP < 70% of the baseline value or SAP < 80 mmHg) will be recorded.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Cumulative duration of hypotension.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Cumulative duration of hypotension will be recorded from induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping).
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Heart rate.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Minimum and maximum heart rate, bradycardia, atropine usage will be recorded.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Neonatal effects.
Time Frame: Time just after delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Arterial and venous blood gas analyses will be performed from the umbilical cord after the cord clamped.
|
Time just after delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Ephedrine treatment.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
If SAB < 100 mmHg; patients will be treated by 5 mg IV bolus ephedrine, if SAB < 90 mmHg; patients will be treated by 10 mg IV bolus ephedrine.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Nausea and/or vomiting.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, incidence of prepartum nausea and/or vomiting will be recorded.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until delivery (umbilical cord clamping). Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Preoperative fasting period.
Time Frame: Time before spinal anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
preoperative fasting period will be recorded.
|
Time before spinal anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Preoperative hemoglobin concentration (g/dL).
Time Frame: Time before spinal anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Before spinal anesthesia.
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Time before spinal anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Durations of anesthesia and surgery.
Time Frame: Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until end of the anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Time period from induction of spinal anesthesia to skin incision (min), time period from induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery (min), time period from uterine incision to birth (sec), duration of anesthesia (min), and duration of surgery (min) will be recorded.
|
Time between induction of spinal anesthesia until end of the anesthesia. Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of two days.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aysun Afife Kar, MD, Şifa Üniversitesi, Basmane Hastanesi, İzmir, Turkey
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 1, 2016
Study Completion (Anticipated)
March 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 15, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
March 19, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 17, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 16, 2015
Last Verified
November 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SifaU
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypotension
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Edwards LifesciencesCompletedHypotension | Intraoperative Hypotension | Postoperative HypotensionNetherlands
-
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterCompleted
-
Attikon HospitalRecruitingHypotension During Surgery | Prevention of HypotensionGreece
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingHypotension Drug-Induced | Hypotension During Surgery
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedBlood Pressure | Postinduction Hypotension | Perioperative HypotensionGermany
-
University of ParmaUnknownHypotension During Dialysis | Dialysis HypotensionItaly
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingPost-induction Hypotension | Postprandial HypotensionChina
-
H. Lundbeck A/SCompletedSymptomatic Neurogenic Orthostatic HypotensionUnited States
-
Mazovia Regional Hospital in SiedlceRecruitingAnesthesia | Hypotension on Induction | Perioperative Injury | Perioperative HypotensionPoland
-
Acibadem UniversityCompletedHypotension | Intraoperative Hypotension | Post-induction Hypotension | Post Anesthesia RecoveryTurkey
Clinical Trials on hydroxyethyl starch (% 6 HES 130/0.4) (Voluven®)
-
Fresenius KabiTerminatedIntraoperative ComplicationsChina
-
SangartCompletedVascular Disease | Critical Lower Limb IschemiaSweden
-
SangartCompletedIschemia | HypotensionNetherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Czech Republic, Poland
-
Fresenius KabiCompleted
-
Fresenius KabiCompletedPostoperative ComplicationsChina
-
SangartCompletedIschemia | HypotensionNetherlands, Belgium, Czech Republic, Sweden, Poland, United Kingdom
-
St. Boniface HospitalUniversity of ManitobaUnknown
-
Hopital FochTerminated
-
The Cleveland ClinicFresenius KabiCompletedPostoperative Kidney InjuryUnited States