Effects of a Movement Training for Subacromial Pain Syndrome (MTforSPS)

March 17, 2015 updated by: Laval University

Effects of a Movement Training Oriented Rehabilitation Program on Symptoms, Functional Limitations and Acromiohumeral Distance in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Objectives: Evaluate the effects of a rehabilitation program based on movement training on symptoms, functional limitations and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) in individuals with SPS.

Methods: Twenty-five participants with SPS participated in a 6-week program. Outcomes of both groups were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks. Changes in symptoms and functional limitations were assessed. Changes in AHD for both groups were assessed using ultrasonographic measures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Multiple factors have been associated with the presence of a subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), including deficits in performance of scapular and glenohumeral muscles. Such deficits can lead to inadequate kinematics and decreased acromiohumeral distance (AHD). Exercises that aim at correcting these deficits, such as movement training, were suggested to improve symptoms and functional limitations. To date, few studies have assessed outcomes following an intervention focused on movement training.

Objectives: Evaluate the effects of a rehabilitation program based on movement training on symptoms, functional limitations and AHD in individuals with SPS.

Design: Prospective single group pre-post design. Methods: Twenty-five participants with SPS (SPS group) participated in a 6-week program. Twenty asymptomatic volunteers were recruited for normative AHD values (control group). Outcomes of both groups were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks, i.e. immediately following intervention for the SPS group. Changes in symptoms and functional limitations for SPS group were assessed using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC) and Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH). Changes in AHD for both groups were assessed using ultrasonographic measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1M 2S8
        • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • painful arc of movement during flexion or abduction
  • positive Neer or Kennedy-Hawkins impingement signs
  • pain on resisted lateral rotation, abduction or empty can test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous shoulder surgery
  • shoulder pain reproduced by neck movement
  • clinical signs of full-thickness RC tears
  • shoulder capsulitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subacromial pain group
Rehabilitation Program: The program was developed to target the deficits described in individuals with SPS. It included movement training, manual therapy, strengthening and stretching exercises, and patient education. Each supervised session lasted around 30 minutes, with 75% of the session for movement training. Three treating physiotherapists supervised the program and initially attended a training session to standardize the program.

Movement training: To re-educate control of movement, exercises of increasing difficulty in terms of movement plane, range of motion, speed and resistance were performed.

Strengthening: Using extremities weight, free weights or elastic bands, scapulothoracic and scapulohumeral strengthening was performed to increase strength and control of shoulder muscles.

Stretching & Manual Therapy: These modalities, performed only if needed, were aimed at addressing stiffness of posterior and inferior glenohumeral capsule and pectoralis minor.

Patient education: Participants received education regarding posture and body mechanics. They were instructed on preferred shoulder positioning during sleep, activities, work and sports

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms and functional limitations - Upper limb
Time Frame: week 6
Upper limb symptoms and functional limitations were assessed using the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. DASH has 30 items that measures upper limb physical disability and symptoms. Final scores range from 0 to 100 (most severe disability).
week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms and functional limitations - Shoulder
Time Frame: week 6
Shoulder symptoms and functional limitations was assessed using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index. The WORC is a disease-specific questionnaire designed for patients with RC disorders. Scores vary from 0 to 100 (high functional status).
week 6
Ultrasonographic measurements of acromiohumeral distance (AHD)
Time Frame: week 6
Measurement of AHD is defined as the tangential distance between the bony landmarks of humeral head and inferior edge of acromion, corresponding to the anterior outlet of subacromial space.Measurements were taken in a sitting position with the arm at rest, and at 45° and 60° of active abduction.
week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Sébastien Roy, PhD, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et en intégration sociale (CIRRIS)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation program

Subscribe