Impacts of Two Rehabilitation Programs on Chronic Peripheral Facial Paresis (VISAGE)

Clinical, Kinematic and Quality-of-life Related Impacts of Two Rehabilitation Programs in Chronic Peripheral Facial Paresis: a Randomized Control Trial.

Introduction: Peripheral facial paresis (PFP) is a very common disease of various etiologies affecting average adults with no predominance of sex. In 70% of cases, motor recovery is rapid and complete, but in 30% of early PFP, motor symptoms such as paresis and/or abnormal movements (synkinesis, contractures and/or spasms) can live on and jeopardize patients quality of life at medium and even long term. Concerning therapeutic interventions, the rehabilitation patient care of PFP is often restricted to the early stage. A recent randomized controlled study showed that early rehabilitation had a positive impact on motor recovery, specifically in severe motor grades, and could also accelerate time of recovery without exacerbating synkinesis. At chronic stage of the pathology, there is no controlled study testing the effect of motor rehabilitation when deficiencies are often considered as fitted and permanents.

Objective: It is well known in other domains that intensive motor strengthening increases cerebral plasticity in general, and particularly that of sensorimotor command. The main hypothesis of the study is that motor strengthening even at chronic stage of PFP could increase motor function and decrease abnormal motor movements through a self-rehabilitation motor program. The main objective is thus to compare the clinical, kinematic and quality-of-life related impacts of two different rehabilitation programs on motor recovery in unilateral PFP at chronic stage (i.e. at least 1 year after injury): a self-rehabilitation program guided by Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) therapist versus facial rehabilitation involving physiotherapist or speech therapist specialized in facial rehabilitation. The main evaluation criterion is the evolution of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale composite score between Day0 (before rehabilitation) and Day180 (after 6 months of facial rehabilitation).

Method: National, Randomized simple blind controlled study, in two parallel groups: Both program have to be realized daily for 6 months (Day1 to Day180). The population is made of adults with unilateral PFP at chronic stage i.e. at least 1 year from injury. Evaluations and follow-up of patients will be accomplished in a single center: Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice de l'Hôpital Mondor in Créteil (France).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint-Joseph
        • Contact:
          • Ludovic BENICHOU, MD
    • Val De Marne
      • Créteil, Val De Marne, France, 94010
      • Créteil, Val De Marne, France, 94010

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 17 yo;
  • Ambulatory patient;
  • Motivation to participate to a rehabilitative facial program for six months;
  • Patient consent to shaving (men) and no makeup (women) in order not to hamper evaluations the morning of the 4 visits of the study ;
  • Signed informed consent;
  • Affiliation to asocial security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral facial paresis of evolving tumoral etiology;
  • Medical history of botulinum toxin injections in facial muscles during the last 6 months preceding inclusion or injections planned during the study;
  • Medical history of facial surgery in the last two years preceding inclusion or planned during the study;
  • Medical history of facial reanimation surgery needing specific rehabilitation (V-VII or XII-VII anastomosis or muscle transfer);
  • Medical history of medical aesthetic facial treatments (hyaluronic acid/ lipofilling/laser/bracing wires) in the preceding two years before inclusion or planned during the study;
  • Recurrent PFP;
  • Implication in other research interventional protocol dealing with aesthetical aspect of the face or with PFP;
  • Intercurrent pathology impeding the realization of the rehabilitation program during the study;
  • Cognitive, mental or psychiatric troubles impeding the realization of the rehabilitation program or the capacity to attend both evaluations and follow-up consultations;
  • Tutorship or guardianship patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Self-rehabilitation guided program with investigator PMR specialist
facial self-rehabilitation for a duration of 6 months
Active Comparator: Control group
Conventional rehabilitation with a speech therapist or physiotherapist specialized in facial rehabilitation
Conventional facial rehabilitation for a duration of 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Composite score of the Sunnybook Facial Grading System
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 180
estimation of resting symmetry (score 0 to 20), symmetry at voluntary movement (score 20 to 100) and synkinesis (score 0 to 15) composite score = symmetry at voluntary movement - resting symmetry - synkinesis from Day 0 to Day 180. (Ross et al. 1996, PMID: 8649870)
Day 0 and Day 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marjolaine BAUDE, MD, APHP CHU Henri Mondor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Self-rehabilitation program

3
Subscribe