- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02397694
Safety and Efficacy of Bictegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
March 25, 2020 updated by: Gilead Sciences
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883 + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bictegravir (BIC) + emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) fixed dose combination (FDC) versus dolutegravir (DTG) + F/TAF in HIV-1 Infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
This study will also evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BIC, emtricitabine and TAF.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
98
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90069
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20036
-
-
Florida
-
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33316
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30312
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
-
-
Michigan
-
Berkley, Michigan, United States, 48072
-
-
New Jersey
-
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07102
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75208
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77004
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77098
-
Longview, Texas, United States, 75605
-
-
Virginia
-
Annandale, Virginia, United States, 22003
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Antiretroviral naive (≤ 10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent)
- Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels ≥ 1,000 copies/mL at screening
- Screening genotype report provided by Gilead Sciences must show sensitivity to tenofovir (TFV) and emtricitabine (FTC)
- Adequate renal function as measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
- CD4+ cell count ≥ 200 cells/µL at screening
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- A new AIDS-defining condition diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening as defined in the study protocol
- Prior use of antiretrovirals in the setting of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or post exposure prophylaxis (PEP)
- Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection
- Hepatitis C infection (Individuals who are hepatitis C virus (HCV) Ab positive, but have a documented negative HCV RNA, are eligible)
- Active, serious infections (other than HIV-1 infection) requiring parenteral antibiotic or antifungal therapy within 30 days prior to baseline
- Participation in any other clinical trial without prior approval from the sponsor is prohibited while participating in this trial
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BIC + F/TAF
Participants will receive BIC + F/TAF FDC + DTG placebo for 48 weeks.
|
75 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
Tablet administered orally once daily
50/200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
|
|
Active Comparator: DTG + F/TAF
Participants will receive DTG + F/TAF FDC + BIC placebo for 48 weeks.
|
200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
50/200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
50 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Tablet administered orally once daily
|
|
Experimental: Open Label Extension Phase
After Week 48 participants continued to take their randomized study drug and attended visits every 12 weeks until treatment assignments were unblinded, at which point all participants returned for an unblinding visit and were given the option to participate in an open-label rollover extension to receive an FDC containing B/F/TAF.
|
50/200/25 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL as Determined by the FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm.
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL as Determined by the FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 12 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL as Determined by the FDA-defined Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48
Time Frame: Week 48
|
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status.
|
Week 48
|
|
The Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 12
|
Baseline; Week 12
|
|
|
The Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
|
Baseline; Week 24
|
|
|
The Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
|
Baseline; Week 48
|
|
|
The Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Positive (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 12
|
Baseline; Week 12
|
|
|
The Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 24
|
Baseline; Week 24
|
|
|
The Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48
|
Baseline; Week 48
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Double-Blinded Randomized Phase
Time Frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum duration: 58 Weeks) plus 30 days (During Double-Blinded Randomized Phase)
|
First dose date up to last dose (maximum duration: 58 Weeks) plus 30 days (During Double-Blinded Randomized Phase)
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Laboratory Abnormalities During Double-Blind Randomized Phase
Time Frame: First dose date up to last dose (maximum duration: 58 Weeks) plus 30 days (During Double-Blinded Randomized Phase)
|
First dose date up to last dose (maximum duration: 58 Weeks) plus 30 days (During Double-Blinded Randomized Phase)
|
|
|
PK Parameter: Cmax for Bictegravir (BIC), Emtricitabine (FTC), Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and Tenofavir (TFV) at Steady-State
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration of the drug.
|
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
|
PK Parameter: Tmax for BIC, FTC, TAF, and TFV at Steady-State
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
Tmax was defined as the time to Cmax.
|
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
|
PK Parameter:Ctau for BIC, FTC and TFV
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
Ctau was defined as the observed drug concentration at the end of the dosing interval.
|
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
|
PK Parameter: AUCtau for BIC, FTC, TAF, and TFV
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
AUCtau is defined as the area under the concentration-time curve of the drug over time.
|
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
|
PK Parameter: t1/2 of BIC, FTC, TAF, and TFV
Time Frame: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
t1/2 was defined as the terminal elimination half-life of the drug
|
0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose at Week 4 or 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sax PE, DeJesus E, Crofoot G, Ward D, Benson P, Dretler R, Mills A, Brinson C, Peloquin J, Wei X, White K, Cheng A, Martin H, Quirk E. Bictegravir versus dolutegravir, each with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet HIV. 2017 Apr;4(4):e154-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30016-4. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
- Sax PE, DeJesus E, Crofoot G, Ward D, Benson P, Dretler R, Mills A, Brinson C, Wei X, Collins SE, Cheng A. Coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide after initial treatment with bictegravir or dolutegravir and emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. AIDS. 2018 Jul 31;32(12):1723-1725. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001894.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 23, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
February 27, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 20, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
March 25, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 7, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 25, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GS-US-141-1475
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Infection
-
Federal University of São PauloGilead SciencesCompleted
-
Fundación HuéspedViiV HealthcareNot yet recruitingHIV-1-infectionArgentina, Brazil
-
Fundación HuéspedMSD Pharmaceuticals LLC; Fundacion IDEAANot yet recruiting
-
Henan Genuine Biotech Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNot yet recruiting
-
Craig Cohen, MD, MPHNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Duke University and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruiting
-
BioNTech SERecruitingHIV -1 InfectionGermany, United States
-
TaiMed Biologics Inc.Active, not recruitingHIV -1 InfectionUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Not yet recruitingHIV -1 Infection | Methamphetamine UseUnited States
Clinical Trials on BIC
-
Ann CokerCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonCompleted
-
AGC Biologics S.p.A.CompletedMalignant Pleural MesotheliomaUnited States, Spain, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Belgium, Egypt, Canada, France, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonCompleted
-
Carmen Hidalgo TenorioGilead SciencesCompleted
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)RecruitingStroke, IschemicUnited States
-
Emory UniversityCompletedHIV | ARTUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedNeurogenic Detrusor OveractivityBelgium
-
José Antonio Mata MarínInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRecruitingObesity | Overweight and/or Obesity | HIV - Human Immunodeficiency VirusMexico
-
Stemirna TherapeuticsRecruitingEfficacy | Safety | ImmunogenicityLao People's Democratic Republic