Effect of California Tri-pull Taping Method on Shoulder Subluxation, Pain, Active Range of Motion and Upper Limb Functional Recovery After Stroke - A Pre Test Post Test Design (CTPT)

March 25, 2015 updated by: Subhasish Chatterjee, Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be University)
This study was conducted to check the effect of California tri-pull taping method on post stroke shoulder subluxation, prior to conduct a large randomized clinical trial this study was conducted, and the result of the study was promising for the treatment of shoulder subluxation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Intervention was given by the lead researcher who was trained for the taping techniques.

Prior to give taping method participants who have hair around the shoulder was instructed to remove hair. Two types of tape was used, a self-adhesive 1.5" cotton undercover tape (VPK, Chennai) and a 1" rigid strapping tape (VPK, Chennai). To approximate the humeral head into the glenoid cavity participants were instructed to place their affected arm on a wooden table. Three piece of tape was used, firstly the investigators applied cotton undercover pre tape and then the investigators applied the rigid post tape on it. First piece (middle) of tape was applied from 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity up to 2 inches above the glenoid cavity. Second piece (posterior) was applied from 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity upto the 1.5 inches above the mid spine of scapula. Third piece (anterior) was applied from the 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity upto the 1.5 inches above the clavicle. (Figure-1). The tape was removed and new tape applied every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and remained on the patient for 6 consecutive weeks.

All the participants were received standardized conventional neuro rehabilitation programme. The conventional neuro rehabilitation treatment includes, active, and passive range of motion exercise, bilateral activation of pectoralis major, activation of lattisimus dorsi, activation of the retractors, weight bearing exercise of upper extremity, activation of supraspinatus, reaching activities, grasping, holding and release, and ADL activities. Every participant was received conventional neuro rehabilitation for 45 minutes and 5 days a week.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Ambala, Haryana, India, 133207
        • MMIPR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute stroke
  2. A minimum of 5 mm (0.2 in.) shoulder subluxation in the involved upper extremity.
  3. MMSE score ˃ 23.
  4. Age (35-70 yrs.) and of either sex.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. MMSE score ˂23.
  2. Other musculoskeletal disorder of the affected upper extremity.
  3. History of trauma to the affected upper extremity.
  4. Hyper or hypo sensitivity disorders.
  5. Any skin allergy.
  6. Individual affected from neurological disorder other than stroke.
  7. Un-cooperative patients.
  8. Individuals with psychosomatic disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
To approximate the humeral head into the glenoid cavity participants were instructed to place their affected arm on a wooden table. Three piece of tape was used, firstly we applied cotton undercover pre tape and then we applied the rigid post tape on it. First piece (middle) of tape was applied from 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity up to 2 inches above the glenoid cavity. Second piece (posterior) was applied from 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity upto the 1.5 inches above the mid spine of scapula. Third piece (anterior) was applied from the 1.5 inches below the deltoid tuberosity upto the 1.5 inches above the clavicle.
Other Names:
  • CTPT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accromio humeral distance (AHD) as measured by Digital Vernier caliper
Time Frame: 1 month
Participants were evaluated for accromio humeral distance (AHD), by using digital Vernier calliper. The measurement was taken in centimetre from the inferior aspect of the acromion to the superior aspect of the humeral head. The patient was in sitting position such a way that tested upper extremity was hanged freely. Paci et al 21 showed in a systemic review that caliper method was reliable for shoulder subluxation measurement. The r value of caliper method was 0.93 and ICC was 0.68. This method also achieved a good validity score, which was 0.747.
1 month
Pain at rest as measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 month
pain at rest was measured by using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). In VAS 1 indicating no pain where 10 indicating extreme pain. Crossley et al 22 conducted a study to assess the reliability of VAS in patella femoral pain. 71 participants were recruited, out of which 20 participants completed the reliability study. He took 3 types of pain readings such as usual pain, worst pain and activity pain. ICC score for usual pain was 0.56, for worst pain it was 0.76 and for activity pain it was 0.83. He also concluded that VAS scale was reliable and valid measure for assessing patella femoral pain.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Active flexion (AFLXN) range of motion as assessed by Goniometric measurement
Time Frame: 1 month
Active flexion (AFLXN) range of motion was assessed using goniometric measurement for shoulder flexion. Active shoulder flexion range was assessed in supine position to avoid trick movement that may happen in sitting position. Hayes et al 23 conducted a study to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. For inter-rater reliability 4 raters took measurement on 8 subjects and for intra-rater reliability one rater took 3 readings within 48 hours. The results of the study showed that the ICC value for goniometric flexion ROM measurement was 0.69 for inter-rater reliability. ICC value for intra-rater reliability was 0.53 for flexion ROM. He also concluded that goniometer has fair-good reliability to measure shoulder flexion range of motion.
1 month
Motor recovery of the upper extremity as assessed by Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA)
Time Frame: 1 month
The motor recovery of the upper extremity was assessed by using Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity. The maximum score for upper extremity motor assessment is 66. Sanford 24 checked the reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing Motor Performance in Patients Following Stroke on 12 patients. The overall reliability was high, ICC = 0.96.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Stroke Shoulder Subluxation

Clinical Trials on california tri-pull taping

3
Subscribe