- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05658211
Culture Analysis Performed During a Latarjet Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Procedure. (CISAL)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Infection is a major cause of failure in shoulder arthroplasty and must be systematically sought at the time of revision, even if this is motivated by other complications (loosening, instability, periprosthetic fracture).
These cultures, performed in patients without clinical suspicion of infection, reveal, in 25 to 60% of cases, the presence of germs of cutaneous origin which, although generally considered to be non-virulent, continue to be debated as to their clinical significance and their implication in the failure of shoulder arthroplasty. Among these germs, propionibacterium acnes, staphylococcus epidermidis or coagulasenegative Staphylococcus are the most frequently identified.
The origin of these germs is still debated. Cultures of deep synovial fluid or tissues from patients receiving a first-line shoulder prosthesis show the presence of Cutibacterium acnes in 9% to 41% of cases despite preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. These infections could be the consequence of contamination by a commensal germ during surgical exposure. Other authors consider them as an etiological factor in the development of shoulder arthritis. They would be more frequent in young subjects and male subjects.
The Latarjet procedure or coracoid bone block is commonly used in the surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability.
It consists of cutting the coracoid bone with the coraco-biceps muscle that inserts on it, then passing it through the subscapularis muscle and fixing it on the scapula, thus creating a bone block. It can be performed by a conventional mini-invasive technique after an incision of 4 to 5 cm on the front of the shoulder or by arthroscopy.
The Latarjet procedure or coracoid bone block is commonly used in the surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability.
It consists of cutting the coracoid bone with the coraco-biceps muscle that inserts on it, then passing it through the subscapularis muscle and fixing it on the scapula, thus creating a bone block. It can be performed by a conventional mini-invasive technique after an incision of 4 to 5 cm on the front of the shoulder or by arthroscopy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75005
- Clinique du Sport
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient 18 years of age or older, who has been informed of the research
- Patient who has undergone a first-line Latarjet operation
- Patient with three cultures performed on the coracoid bone blocks
- Patient regularly followed since the operation and for whom all data are available during the six-month follow-up visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous open shoulder surgery
- Associated rotator cuff injury requiring repair
- Clinical signs of preoperative infection
- Patient under court protection, guardianship or curatorship
- Patient who has indicated his or her opposition to the use of his or her medical data (by filling out and returning the non-opposition form that will be sent to him or her).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of patients with positive culture
Time Frame: Month 6
|
The primary endpoint, based on the culture result, is the number of patients with at least one positive culture
|
Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Walch-Duplay Questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 6
|
The Walch questionnaire includes a descriptive part (type and level of sport practiced, dominant score) and an evaluation scale of subjective and objective data (stability, pain, recovery of sport level, mobility) to assess the clinical result of the shoulder stabilization.
The score ranges from 0 to 100.
The result is considered excellent for a score of 91 to 100 points, good for 76 to 90 points, average for 51 to 75 points, and poor for a score of 50 points or less.
|
Month 6
|
|
Constant score
Time Frame: Month 6
|
The Constant and Murley score explores several domains: pain, activity, strength and mobility. The total score varies from 0 to 100 points, 100 points corresponding to a normal shoulder and 0 to a totally deficient shoulder. |
Month 6
|
|
Bacteriological criterion
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Nature of germs identified in culture
|
Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- COS-RGDS-2021-06-014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shoulder Instability Subluxation Bilateral
-
Chirurgie Du SportRecruitingShoulder Instability | Shoulder Instability Subluxation BilateralFrance
-
Hvidovre University HospitalActive, not recruitingShoulder Instability Subluxation BilateralDenmark
-
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityActive, not recruitingGlenohumeral Subluxation | Shoulder Instability Subluxation Bilateral | Shoulder SubluxationTaiwan
-
Duke UniversityCompletedShoulder Injuries | Anterior Shoulder Instability | Shoulder Dislocation | Instability, Joint | Shoulder Subluxation | Glenoid; DislocationUnited States
-
Spaarne GasthuisFlevoziekenhuis; Ziekenhuis Amstelland; OLVG; Gelre Hospitals; Medisch Spectrum TwenteNot yet recruitingShoulder Instability | Kinesiophobia | Shoulder Dislocation or Subluxation | Fear of Movement
-
Juan AmeztoyActive, not recruitingShoulder Instability | Anterior Shoulder Instability | Latarjet | Shoulder | Anterior Shoulder DislocationSpain
-
DigitalRehabNot yet recruitingProstheses | Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder | Shoulder Posterior Instability | Shoulder Anterior Instability | Shoulder Anterior Latarjet InstabilityItaly
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCompleted
-
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS TrustUniversity of SydneyCompletedAtraumatic Shoulder InstabilityUnited Kingdom
-
Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyCompletedStroke | Subluxation, Glenohumeral