- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02432300
The Emotion Builder: An Intervention for Emotional Deficits After Brain Injury
November 20, 2017 updated by: Dawn Neumann, EmotEd
The purpose of this study is to examine a web-based training program for treating emotional problems in people who have suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a pilot study to examine how subjects with TBI feel about the virtual reality program as a treatment and to assess the effectiveness of the virtual reality program at increasing subjects' awareness and understanding of emotions.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
17
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University Health Facilities
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- TBI (injury due to an external physical force);
- Moderate to severe TBI, defined either by74 Glasgow Coma Score at time of injury (≤12), or post-traumatic amnesia (≥1 day), or loss of consciousness (≥30 minutes);
- ≥1 year post-injury;
- between 18-65 years old;
- Have a moderate to high alexithymia score (≥52) on the TAS-2070 at screening.
Exclusion criteria:
- Diagnosed with pre-morbid neurological disorders (e.g. stroke, autism, alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease);
- Formerly diagnosed with a developmental disability;
- Pre-morbid diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders (e.g. schizophrenia);
- Unable to follow directions;
- Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments that would prevent sufficient task participation;
- No access to reliable transportation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Treatment sessions with a virtual treatment program called Emotion Builder
|
Total of 8 therapy sessions with the Emotion Builder over approximately four (4) weeks (2 sessions a week)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire comprised of three sub-constructs (Difficulty Identifying feelings, Difficulty Describing Feelings, Externally-oriented Thinking).
The full scale range is 20-100 (higher scores indicate higher alexithymia).
Subscales are summed to compute a total score Scores between 52 and 60 indicate moderate alexithymia; scores 61 and higher indicate high alexithymia.
|
Week 6
|
|
Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
The LEAS is comprised of ten hypothetical scenarios that are three or four sentences in length.
Participants must respond how they think they would feel and how another person would feel in response to the hypothetical scenario.
The more discrete emotions (e.g., bad vs sad) receive higher points, as well as blended emotions (e.g.
sad and angry).
There are 10 items on this measure.
The minimum score for each item is 0 and the max score for each item is 5.
The item scores are summed to calculate a total score.
Thus, the total scores range from 0-50; 0=lowest awareness and 50=highest awareness.
A computerized scoring system and parallel forms were used.
|
Week 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as an Assessment of Depression
Time Frame: Week 6
|
The PHQ-9 is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess depression through nine questions that come directly from the DSM-IV signs and symptoms of major depression.
The 9 items describe problems associated with depression, and participants must rate how often they have been bothered by the problems in the last 2 weeks on a 0-3 scale.
The scores are summed for a total depression score, ranging from 0-27, which higher scores indicating greater depression.
|
Week 6
|
|
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Week 6
|
The STAI is a self-report measure of state and trait anxiety (20 items each).
The trait anxiety subscale was the variable of interest for this study.
Higher scores indicate more trait or state anxiety.
Scores for each scale range from 20-80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
The raw scores were converted into T scores using age and gender norms provided by the authors for the STAI.
A score of 50 represents the mean.
A difference of 10 from the mean indicates a difference of one standard deviation.
Higher T scores were still indicative of higher anxiety.
We reported T scores for trait anxiety.
|
Week 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dawn Neumann, PhD, Indiana University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 28, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
May 4, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 22, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 20, 2017
Last Verified
November 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1R41HD077967-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 1404681990 (Other Identifier: Institutional Review Board (IRB))
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury
-
Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale MaggioreCompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateItaly
-
Hospital Sirio-LibanesUniversity of Sao Paulo; Ministry of Health, Brazil; Hospital Sao Rafael; PROAD... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBrain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic Moderate | Post Traumatic EpilepsyBrazil
-
University of TurkuTurku University Hospital; The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation... and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain Injuries | TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury, Brain, TraumaticFinland
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueRecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)France
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUniversity of CincinnatiCompletedBrain Injury Traumatic MildUnited States
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterAlbert Einstein College of Medicine; National Institute of Neurological Disorders... and other collaboratorsRecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury With Loss of Consciousness | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateUnited States
-
BrainScope Company, Inc.Active, not recruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Concussion, Brain | MTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Closed Head InjuryUnited States
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteCentre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation; Ontario Neurotrauma FoundationRecruitingBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury, Chronic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateCanada
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownTraumatic Brain Injury | Severe Brain Injury | Closed Traumatic Brain InjuryBrazil
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompleted
Clinical Trials on Emotion Builder
-
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalRecruitingStroke, IschemicTaiwan
-
University of CincinnatiUniversity of Toronto; Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRecruiting
-
The Catholic University of AmericaCompletedPsychosocial FunctioningUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns...Genentech, Inc.; WellPoint, Inc.Completed
-
Michigan State UniversityJohns Hopkins University; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child... and other collaboratorsCompletedControl | BPG InterventionMalawi, Uganda
-
University of DenverNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Treatment InnovationsCompleted
-
Northwell HealthWithdrawn
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityRecruitingDepression | Anxiety | Distress, Emotional | Rumination | Self-Criticism | WorryUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...CompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Executive Dysfunction | Emotion Dysregulation | Emotion DysfunctionUnited States