Lymphocytic Enteritis and Suspected Coeliac Disease: Gluten vs Placebo

June 15, 2015 updated by: Fernando Fernandez-Bañares, Hospital Mutua de Terrassa

Lymphocytic Enteritis and Suspected Coeliac Disease: Double-blind Gluten vs Placebo Rechallenge

Patients with lymphocytic enteritis (LE), HLA-DQ2/8+, negative celiac serology and clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet (GFD) do not fulfil the diagnostic criteria of coeliac disease (CoD). At present it remains unclear whether they suffer from coeliac gluten sensitivity (CGS) or non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). There are specific tissue markers of CoD such as anti-transglutaminase deposits (tTG) and intraepithelial lymphocytes expressing T-cell receptor (TCR) gamma/delta+.

Aim: To demonstrate the existence of CGS in these patients despite having negative celiac serology.

Methods: Double-blind randomized clinical trial of gluten vs placebo rechallenge for 6 months in patients with LE on a GFD. Inclusion criteria: >18 years, initial presentation with GI symptoms, HLA-DQ2/8+, negative celiac serology, good clinical and histological response to GFD. Patients were randomised to gluten (20 g/day) and placebo (maltrodextrin) (identical powder sachets mixed with meals). Clinical symptoms were analysed using visual analogue scales. Quality of life (GIQLI), adherence to diet, serology, and histological changes including gamma/delta+ IEL and tTG deposits were evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytosis (lymphocytic enteritis, LE) is defined by normal villous architecture and intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) >25/100 enterocytes. It is a frequent finding present in 2% to 5,4% of duodenal biopsies.

LE is secondary to coeliac disease (CoD) in only a minority of patients, since it may be a response to other inflammatory processes in the gut. Other possible aetiologies of LE include infections (Helicobacter Pylori), drugs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or acetylsalicylic acid) and autoimmune disease. Observational studies have established CoD to account for 10% to 43% of cases with LD and positive HLA-DQ2/8 after undertaking an exhaustive diagnostic work-up. These 'minor' forms of CoD may have similar clinical manifestations to those with villous atrophy.

However, these patients with 'minor' CoD have often negative celiac serology, and then do not fulfil the present criteria to diagnose CoD. In fact, using the present diagnostic criteria they should be included in the definition of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). For diagnosing NCGS it is necessary to rule out CoD by means of negative serology -endomysial and tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies- and a duodenal biopsy with absence of villous atrophy on a gluten-containing diet. As such it is accepted that NCGS patients might have LE. A recent systematic review on NCGS revealed that 44% of patients presented HLA-DQ2/8 haplotypes, suggesting that a subgroup of patients with NCGS may actually belong in the spectrum of CoD, which some authors have so-called 'coeliac lite' disease.

The gold-standard assay for confirming NCGS requires dietary elimination, followed by double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled food challenge. This procedure is difficult to adopt routinely in clinical practice. To date two double-blind placebo-controlled dietary interventions in patients with presumptive NCGS have been published. The first gluten vs placebo rechallenge trial showed that patients who received gluten had significantly more abdominal symptoms than those on placebo (68% vs 40%). The second study that investigated the specific effects of gluten after dietary reduction of fermentable, poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates (FODMAPs) in subjects believed to have NCGS, showed no symptomatic worsening after gluten challenge as compared to placebo. Thus, there was no evidence of specific or dose dependent effect of gluten on NCGS patients placed on a diet low in FODMAPs. It is worth mentioning that patients included in these trials were HLA-DQ2/8 negative, and if positive they had a normal duodenal biopsy (Marsh 0) while on a gluten containing diet. Besides, a GFD has been shown to be more effective in IBS-D patients with negative CoD serology but HLA-DQ2/8+ than in those with a negative genetic study.

The recent ESPGHAN guidelines for CoD diagnosis suggest that in cases with low-grade enteropathy (including LE) both a high γδ IEL count and the presence of Ig A anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-TG2) deposits in the mucosa increase the likelihood of CoD. In contrast to CoD, there is stated that in NCGS there is not an increase of T-cell receptor γδ IELs. However, these parameters have only been scarcely used to rule out CoD in patients with NCGS in literature.

The aim of study was demonstrate the existence of gluten sensitivity in patients with HLA-DQ2/8+, LE and negative celiac serology, who had presented a clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet (GFD), using a gluten vs placebo-controlled challenge. In addition, to assess the presence of tissue markers of CoD before and after gluten challenge, thus confirming the existence of a 'coeliac-lite' disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Giving written informed consent
  2. Patients with age ≥18 years
  3. Histological diagnosis confirmed of lymphocytic enteritis (LE)
  4. Celiac genetic study (HLA-DQ2 and /or HLA-DQ8 positive)
  5. Negative serology of celiac disease
  6. Previous complete clinical and histological response to gluten-free diet
  7. Initial (at diagnosis) GI symptoms with or without extraintestinal manifestations.
  8. No previous studies on both IEL cytometric pattern and anti-TG2 IgA subepithelial deposits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are unable to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements according to the investigator.
  2. Participation in a clinical trial in the last 30 days, simultaneous participation in a trial or prior participation in this study.
  3. Previous diagnosis with gluten-sensitive enteropathy with villous atrophy and positive serology.
  4. Patients with LE and initial response to gluten free diet but that at the time of inclusion are on a normal gluten-containing diet.
  5. Severe co-morbidities.
  6. Drug or alcohol abuse.
  7. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.

At the initial diagnosis, other LE aetiologies, like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake, parasitic infection, and Helicobacter pylori infection, were appropriately ruled out.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Gluten challenge
Gluten powder (10 g every 12 hours), 24 weeks
gluten (20 g/day) (identical powder sachets than placebo, mixed with meals) rechallenge while on a gluten-free diet
Placebo Comparator: Placebo challenge
Placebo (maltodextrin; 10 g every 12 hours), 24 weeks
placebo (maltrodextrin) (identical powder sachets than gluten, mixed with meals) rechallenge while on a gluten-free diet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical relapse
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual analogue scale on clinical symptoms at each visit (Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in health related quality of life
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
GI quality of life index (GIQLI) at basal and 24 week visits
Change from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Histological evolution (Changes in intraepithelial lymphocyte count)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Changes in intraepithelial lymphocyte count
Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Changes in gamma/delta cells
Time Frame: Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Changes in cytometric count of gamma/delta cells
Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Changes in transglutaminase deposits
Time Frame: Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)
Presence of tTG deposits (IF)
Changes from baseline at 6 months (or premature withdrawn)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando Fernández-Bañares, MD, Hospital Mutua Terrassa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Celiac Disease

Clinical Trials on Gluten challenge

3
Subscribe