Minimally Invasive Sphincter Sparing Total Mesorectal Excision for Ultra-low Rectal Cancer After Initial Chemo-radiotherapy (MISS-TRICR). (MISS-TRICR)

July 1, 2015 updated by: Osama Mohammad Ali ElDamshety, Mansoura University

Outcomes of Transanal Minimally Invasive TME Versus Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection Techniques for Rectal Cancer After Initial Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy: Double Blinded Study

A prospective study is planned for management of low rectal cancer with the aim of sphincter preservation and improving the oncological outcome of the patients, through comparing of both approaches minimally invasive techniques including transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ideal surgery for rectal cancer should not only obtain adequate radial and circumferential margins, but also preserve normal sphincter function.In 1990, the results of a 'close shave' at anterior resection were reported, suggesting that a resection margin of 1 cm or less produced an oncological outcome similar to that of a resection margin greater than 1 cm.

Sphincter preservation presents several advantages; The lower risk of intraoperative rectal perforation and positive circumferential margin than APR, the lower risk of damaging the pelvic branches of the pelvic autonomic nerve and The preservation of the body image that may increase quality of life.

Recently, the clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection (ISR) as a laparoscopic approach (laparoscopic ISR) has been reported, but laparoscopic ISR for patients with bulky low rectal cancer remains challenging particularly for T3 tumors in patients with a narrow pelvis, because of the difficulty in understanding the accurate anatomy of the small pelvic cavity, in dissecting the TME or the tumor specific mesorectal excision (TSME) plane, and in transecting the lower rectum safely. Moreover, numerous studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic techniques have many advantages in colorectal surgery compared with open surgery.

Although Radical resection is the gold standard for the treatment of rectal cancer, TEM offers the advantage of combining a minimally invasive technique with evident benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity and recovery, long-term functional outcomes and subsequently improved quality of life. Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) developed at 1984 and eliminated most of local transanal excision limitations and triggered a significant improvement in the local excision procedures of rectal lesions. While TEM became the 'gold standard' for the treatment of large rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer, there are special concerns about the lack of adequate lymphadenectomy.

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy is widely used to treat locally advanced rectal cancer to increase resectability, and to enhance sphincter preservation, local control and possibly, survival rates. Surgery is performed six to eight weeks after radiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35511
        • Oncology centre Of Mansoura University (OCMU)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge
  • Fit (Medically and surgically) for laparoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with massive abdominal adhesions
  • Unfit for laparoscopy
  • Unwilling to share in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LISR group
Cases which undergo rectal resection with laparoscopic intersphincteric resection.
the patient undergo laparoscopic mesorectal excision with high inferior mesenteric vein ligation combined with transanal distal resection of the rectum
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic total mesorectum excision with coloaanal anastomosis.
Active Comparator: TAMIS Group
Cases with rectal cancer which undergo Transanal minimally invasive Total mesorectal excision.
Transanal minimally invasive total mesorectal excision assisted with minilaparoscopy to ligate the inferior mesenteric vessels and splenic flexure mobilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity within 30 days starting from the time of the operation
Time Frame: within 30 days
within 30 days
Hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days
Hospital stay starting from the day of admission till discharge.
up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Osama eldamshety, PhD, Assistant Lecturer of surgical oncology
  • Study Chair: Sherif Kotb, PhD, MD, Professor of surgical oncology
  • Principal Investigator: Adel Fathi, PhD, MD, Lecturer of surgical oncology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LISR group)

Subscribe