Decreasing Youth Involvement in Violence in Burundi

November 27, 2017 updated by: Anselm Crombach, University of Konstanz
The purpose of the current study is to examine the psychological well-being of youth within the context of participation in political violence during the 2015 election period in Burundi. In detail, the investigators are interested in fostering improved outcomes in a peace-building initiative aimed at youth in Burundi by reducing the mental health-related stress of the initiative's most severely affected participants. In addition, the investigators are interested in learning more about the youth experience of involvement in the Burundian political system in an effort to understand the links between youth engagement in political violence and past experiences of traumatic events.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The African Great Lakes Region is marked by several countries which have been ravaged by violence for several years. One of these countries is Burundi, a small state bordered by Rwanda, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This country has been stricken by more than a decade of civil war, which ended only in 2006.

Today, many people still struggle in coping with the aftermath of the war. Political parties remain largely drawn along ethnic lines. These identities are often manipulated in order to incite violence and intimidation against opposing parties or groups. Violence between rival youth wings was a disturbing feature of the 2010 elections in Burundi, with similar conditions manifesting themselves in advance of the 2015 presidential election.

Further complicating the situation in Burundi, one of the problems people in war-affected populations often face is the high impairment due to mental health problems. Studies in crisis regions have shown that multiple experiences of traumatic life events seriously damages mental health and can lead to disorders such as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or depression. Further, the risk of developing PTSD rapidly increases with the number of traumatic events experienced, as the occurrence of PTSD is more likely when the accumulation of trauma exceeds a certain limit. This phenomenon has been described as the "building block effect". This means, people in the context of armed conflicts and war are especially at risk to develop PTSD, as the total load of perceived stress is much higher than anywhere else. Furthermore, recent studies have revealed that combatants and other populations living in violent and insecure circumstances may adapt to their environment by developing an attraction to perpetrating violence, i.e. appetitive aggression. While appetitive aggression helps individuals to survive in violent environments by reducing their likelihood of developing trauma-related symptoms, it increases the risk of getting involved in the perpetration of violence.

In order to address the mental health needs of the participants in the present study, the investigators will be utilizing an intervention, Narrative Exposure Therapy for Forensic Offender Rehabilitation (FORNET), that has been demonstrated to reduce posttraumatic symptomology and readiness for aggressive behavior.

Objectives:

The aim of the present study is to investigate the intersection of politics and mental health within the context of Burundi. Specifically, the study will be seeking to answer the following research questions:

  1. Mental Health Barriers to Participation in Peace Building Initiatives: What, if any, role does the presence of mental health issues such as PTSD and depression play in effective participation in peace-building efforts? Can FORNET contribute to peace building programs?
  2. Links Between Mental Health Issues and Political Participation: What is the role of mental health issues in shaping the readiness to resort to violence as a result of political beliefs and attitudes toward members of other political parties in a post-conflict setting?

    1. Appetitive Aggression. Does the concept of appetitive aggression influence the manner of political participation? Does appetitive aggression have a relationship to the perpetration of politically-motivated violence?
    2. Trauma-related disorders. Do trauma-related disorders such as PTSD and depression influence the manner of political participation? Do they have a relationship to the perpetration of politically-motivated violence?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bujumbura, Burundi
        • vivo international & Psychologues sans Frontières mental health center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High degree of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder according to the Posttraumatic Symptom Scale
  • High degree of appetitive aggression
  • Violent behavior during the past three months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of mind altering drugs
  • Psychotic symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Program Group
The treatment arm will consist of 20 randomly selected participants who will receive Narrative Exposure Therapy for Forensic Offender Rehabilitation (FORNET) for their traumatic symptomology, aggression, and depression. FORNET consists of a guided exposure of the participant's traumatic experiences in chronological order and integrating them into a coherent biographical memory.The intervention addresses the participant's positive, negative, and violent memories of events that have taken place during their lifetime, and also provides participants an opportunity to asses their current situation and future plans. FORNET can be completed in six sessions and each session lasts 90 minutes on average.
See arm description.
Other Names:
  • FORNET
Active Comparator: Treatment As Usual (TAU)
Participants in the TAU group will receive group and individual psycho-social support from trained peer-support workers, with 10 sessions occurring throughout the course of the intervention for each participant. In addition, there will be sensitisation trainings as well as mentoring for establishing greater financial independence. Last, TAU will include one-day events promoting social cohesion and peace.
See arm description
Other Names:
  • TAU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Baseline PTSD Scores at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will be assessed using the PSS-I
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Change in Baseline Depression Scores at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Change in Baseline Appetitive Aggression Scores at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Assesses attitudes towards the perception and disposition of different forms of violence using the Appetitive Aggression Scale for Children (AAS-C).
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Baseline Physical State at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will be assessed using a structured list of a range of ailments
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Change in Social Integration Scores at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will assess levels of participant integration with family and community using scores between 0-4, with higher scores indicating higher levels of social integration.
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Change in Scores on the Attitudes Toward Members of Other Political Parties Scale at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will assess nature of attitudes towards other political parties with which the participant is not affiliated.
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Scores on the Opinion on the Civil War Scale at 3-months-followup and 9-months-followup
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
Will assess participant opinions on their acceptance of members of other ethnic groups, responsibility for the civil war, and reparation and transitions post-conflict.
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anselm Crombach, University of Konstanz, vivo international e.V., Psychologues sans Frontiers Burundi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aggression

Clinical Trials on Narrative Exposure Therapy for Forensic Offender Rehab

3
Subscribe