A Clinical Investigation of the ClarVista HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens Implant Following Cataract Surgery

May 6, 2020 updated by: ClarVista Medical

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Feasibility Trial of the ClarVista HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens System for the Treatment of Aphakia Following Cataract Surgery

The main objectives of this feasibility study were:

  • To demonstrate the feasibility of HARMONI Modular Intraocular Lens (HMIOL) implantation and assembly in subjects undergoing cataract surgery (All HMIOL Cohort), and
  • To demonstrate the feasibility of the HMIOL optic component exchange procedure (performed 3 months following primary cataract extraction) (Cohort 2).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible subjects with bilateral cataracts underwent cataract extraction and IOL implantation using phacoemulsification. The study eye was implanted with the investigational device (All HMIOL Cohort). The fellow eye was treated with a commercially available intraocular lens (IOL) per standard of care procedure. At the scheduled Month 3 post-operative visit, subjects who did not opt to pursue an optic exchange procedure in the study eye were enrolled into subgroup Cohort 1 and followed for an additional 6 months. The total duration of participation for Cohort 1 was up to 15 months, which included a Day -90 to Day -1 preoperative period and a 12 month post-operative follow-up period. At the scheduled Month 3 post-operative visit, subjects who elected to pursue an optic exchange procedure in the study eye were enrolled into subgroup Cohort 2 and followed for an additional 12 months. The total duration of participation for Cohort 2 was up to 18 months, which included a Day -90 to Day -1 preoperative period, an optic exchange at Month 3 postoperative, and a 12 month post-exchange follow-up period.

Alcon Research, LLC, acquired ClarVista Medical in 2017. This study was designed and conducted by ClarVista Medical, Inc., to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HMIOL. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by ClarVista Medical, Inc. to Alcon Research, LLC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

217

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1050
        • ClarVista Investigational Site
    • Manila
      • Makati City, Manila, Philippines, 1200
        • ClarVista Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Must be willing and able to return for scheduled treatment and follow-up examinations for up to 15 month study duration
  • Planned bilateral removal of visually significant bilateral cataracts
  • Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) projected to be better than 20/32 after IOL implantation in both eyes
  • Preoperative bilateral BCDVA of 20/40 or worse
  • Both eyes must have corneal astigmatism ≤ 1.50 diopter (D)
  • Women must be post-menopausal ≥1 year or surgically sterilized, or a pregnancy screen must be performed prior to the study and a reliable form of contraception, approved by the investigator, must be maintained during the study
  • Dilated pupil size equal to or greater than 6 millimeters (mm) in primary study eye
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in any other drug or device clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrolling in this study and/or during study participation
  • History of any intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye (including refractive)
  • History of any clinically significant retinal pathology or ocular diagnosis in either eye
  • History of any ocular conditions which could affect the stability of the IOL
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All HMIOL Cohort
HMIOL implantation with or without optic exchange
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Experimental: Cohort 1
HMIOL implantation with no optic exchange
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Experimental: Cohort 2
HMIOL implantation with optic exchange
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Removal of one optic and replacement with another for the purpose of improving refractive outcomes
Other: Fellow Eye
IOL implantation per standard of care
IOL per investigator's standard of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative BCDVA 20/40 Snellen or Better by Study Visit - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 meters (m) with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative BCDVA 20/40 Snellen or Better by Study Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative BCDVA 20/40 Snellen or Better by Study Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. An optic exchange occurred at the Month 3 visit, after which subjects were followed for an additional 12 months. Month 1 postoperative and Month 3 postoperative visits were pre-optic exchange. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative BCDVA 20/40 Snellen or Better by Study Visit - Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within Target by Study Visit - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within Target by Study Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within Target by Study Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). An optic exchange occurred at the Month 3 visit, after which subjects were followed for an additional 12 months. Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, and Month 3 postoperative visits were pre-optic exchange. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within Target by Study Visit - Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). This analysis was prespecified for the fellow eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Mean BCDVA (Letters Read) by Study Visit - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Day -90 to Day -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day -90 to Day -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Mean BCDVA (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Mean BCDVA (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. An optic exchange occurred at the Month 3 visit, after which subjects were followed for an additional 12 months. Month 1 postoperative and Month 3 postoperative visits were pre-optic exchange.This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
Mean BCDVA (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA was rrecorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the fellow eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day -90 to -1 preoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) (Letters Read) by Study Visit - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Day 1 post-optic exchange, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exch
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. An optic exchange occurred at the Month 3 visit, after which subjects were followed for an additional 12 months. Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, and Month 3 postoperative visits were pre-optic exchange. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Day 1 post-optic exchange, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exch
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) (Letters Read) by Study Visit - Fellow Eye
Time Frame: Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the fellow eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative, Month 12 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With UCDVA by Category (Snellen) for Each Post-optic Exchange Study Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 1 post-optic exchange, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under well-lit conditions at a distance of 4 m with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. An optic exchange occurred at the Month 3 visit, after which subjects were followed for an additional 12 months. Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, and Month 3 postoperative visits were pre-optic exchange. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye, Cohort 2 only. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 post-optic exchange, Week 1 post-optic exchange, Month 1 post-optic exchange, Month 3 post-optic exchange, Month 6 post-optic exchange, Month 12 post-optic exchange
Mesopic Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (mBCDVA) (With and Without Glare) (Letters Read) at Study Visit - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Month 3 postoperative
VA was assessed using the ETDRS-Fast method under mesopic (dimly lit) conditions at a distance of 4 m with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. Testing was performed with and without glare. Chart luminance was set to 3 cd/m2. mBCDVA was recorded in letters read correctly. This analysis was prespecified for the study eye, All HMIOL Cohort only. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 3 postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. CDMA Project Lead, Surgical, Alcon Research, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CP-00001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Harmoni Modular Intraocular Lens

3
Subscribe