Visual and Refractive Outcomes of The ClarVista HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens System (HMIOL)

December 8, 2020 updated by: ClarVista Medical

Evaluation of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of The ClarVista HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens System

The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual and refractive outcomes with the use of the HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens (HMIOL) System implantation, assembly, and optic exchange in subjects undergoing cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All subjects were implanted with the HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens (HMIOL) System in the right eye, left eye, or both eyes based on the best interest of the subject and the clinical judgment the Investigator (Day 0, primary implantation) (Cohort 1). At Month 1 post primary implantation, subjects were given the option to undergo an optic exchange procedure. Subjects who underwent the optic exchange (Cohort 2) (Day 0, optic exchange) were followed for an additional month. Subjects who did not undergo an optic exchange were exited from the study, except at 1 site, which followed subjects up to Month 12.

Alcon Research, LLC, acquired ClarVista Medical in 2017. This study was designed and conducted by ClarVista Medical, Inc. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by ClarVista Medical, Inc. to Alcon Research, LLC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to understand and sign an approved Informed Consent Form (ICF);
  • Willing and able to return for scheduled treatment and follow-up examinations;
  • Planned removal of cataracts (cortical, nuclear, subcapsular, or a combination) by manual phacoemulsification cataract extraction;

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any ocular conditions which could affect the stability of the IOL in either eye;
  • Traumatic or congenital cataract;
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during the study period;
  • Medications that may confound the outcome or increase risk to the subject;
  • Any clinical finding or intraocular complication during primary cataract surgery or Implantation of the lens system likely to increase complications or risk to the subject;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary Implantation (Cohort 1)
Primary implantation with HMIOL through Month 1 visit, followed by study exit. 1 site followed up to Month 12.
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag.
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Experimental: Optic Exchange (Cohort 2)
Subset of Cohort 1 with optic exchange at Month 1 post primary implantation, followed up to Month 1 post optic exchange
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag.
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Removal of one optic and replacement with another for the purpose of improving refractive outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Day 1 post primary implantation, Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 1 post primary implantation, Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 0 pre optic exchange, Day 1 post optic exchange, Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned. The optic exchange occurred 1 month following primary implantation with HMIOL.
Day 0 pre optic exchange, Day 1 post optic exchange, Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with subject manifest refraction in place. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with subject manifest refraction in place. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was measured in diopters (D) and calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. A less negative value indicates a more accurate IOL power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was measured in diopters (D) and calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. A less negative value indicates a more accurate IOL power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Primary Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Base Implantation? - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Day 0 primary implantation
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 0 primary implantation
Number of Surgeon Responses to Primary Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Implantation and Assembly? - All HMIOL Cohort
Time Frame: Day 0 primary implantation
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 0 primary implantation
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Implantation and Assembly (Exchange)? - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 0 post-exchange
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Disassembly? - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 0 post-exchange
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Explantation? - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Day 0 post-exchange
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSI) (Other Than Optic Exchange)
Time Frame: Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.
A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure that occurred after primary implantation and was conducted for the purpose of resolving residual refractive error (RRE) and optimizing visual outcomes, as determined by the investigator. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.
Number of Device Deficiencies
Time Frame: Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.
A device deficiency was defined as a failure of the device to meet its performance specifications or expectations, or otherwise not perform as intended. This could include either a malfunction or damage to the device or any part thereof, regardless of the source of malfunction or damage, including user error, and regardless of the presence of injury (or lack thereof) to subject, user, or bystander. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, CDMA Surgical, Alcon Research, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CVM-00001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Harmoni Modular Intraocular Lens

3
Subscribe