ClarVista HARMONI Toric Trial With Intraoperative Exchange

June 2, 2020 updated by: ClarVista Medical

A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the Exchangeable ClarVista HARMONI Modular Toric Intraocular Lens System for the Treatment of Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism and Aphakia Following Cataract Surgery

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a toric optic in subjects with pre-existing corneal astigmatism in need of cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects were implanted with the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System (HMIOL). The eye with the higher corneal astigmatism (study eye) was assigned to Cohort 1 and received the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a toric optic. The fellow eye was assigned to Cohort 2 and received the HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System with a non-toric optic during primary implantation, which was replaced with the appropriate optic power (toric or non-toric) during an intraoperative exchange (IOE) procedure. A total of 7 study visits were planned, including a preoperative visit, operative visits for each eye, and 4 follow-up visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperative. The total duration of participation for each subject was up to 6 months, which included a Day -90 to Day -0 preoperative period.

Alcon Research, LLC, acquired ClarVista Medical in 2017. This study was designed and conducted by ClarVista Medical, Inc. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by ClarVista Medical, Inc. to Alcon Research, LLC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baja California
      • Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, 22320
        • ClarVista Investigative Site
    • Manila
      • Makati, Manila, Philippines, 1200
        • ClarVista Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing and able to return for scheduled treatment and follow-up examinations for up to 6 month study duration.
  • Planned removal of visually significant bilateral cataracts.
  • Pre-existing corneal astigmatism in at least 1 eye.
  • Willing to discontinue contact lens wear for the duration of the study.
  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) projected to be 0.2 logarithm Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or lower.
  • Visual symptoms related to cataracts.

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • History of any intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye (including refractive).
  • Pregnant or lactating.
  • History of any clinically significant retinal pathology or ocular diagnosis in either eye that could alter or limit final postoperative visual prognosis.
  • History of any ocular condition which could affect the stability of the intraocular lens (IOL) in either eye.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye (per Investigator judgement).
  • Severe dry eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would impair the ability to obtain reliable study measurements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
Study eye: Primary implantation of HMIOL system with toric optic and no intraoperative optic exchange
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Experimental: Cohort 2
Fellow eye: Primary implantation of HMIOL system with monofocal optic, followed by intraoperative optic exchange (toric or non-toric optic)
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag
Other Names:
  • HMIOL
Removal of one optic and replacement with another during cataract surgery for the purpose of improving refractive outcomes
Other Names:
  • IOE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of added correction needed to compensate for any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number, with a less negative number indicating a lesser amount of added correction. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder (MRCYL) Prediction Error (PE) for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL
Time Frame: Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. MRCYL PE was calculated as postoperative MRCYL adjusted to 6 meters minus MRCYL target residual refractive error (TRRE), with a lower absolute value indicating a more accurate cylinder power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Mean Reduction in Cylinder Power for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. Cylinder power reduction was calculated as the absolute preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) minus the absolute postoperative magnitude of MRCYL at the corneal plane. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative
Mean Percent Reduction in Cylinder Power for Eyes Implanted With HMTIOL
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Manifest refraction cylinder is the amount of power needed to correct any astigmatism that may be present. MRCYL was measured in diopters and reported as a negative number. Cylinder power reduction was calculated as the absolute preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) minus the absolute postoperative magnitude of MRCYL at the corneal plane. Therefore, the cylindrical power percent reduction was the cylinder power reduction divided by the absolute value of preoperative magnitude of corneal cylinder (K) × 100. A higher number (greater percent reduction) indicates better astigmatism correction by the toric IOL. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 preoperative), Month 3 postoperative
Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Prediction Error (PE)
Time Frame: Month 3 postoperative
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder, and measured in diopters (D). MRSE PE was calculated as postoperative MRSE adjusted to 6 meters minus MRSE target residual refractive error (TRRE). The lower the absolute number, the more accurate the IOL power calculation is. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Month 3 postoperative
Mean Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees, with a lower number indicating less rotation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Number of Eyes With Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees and is reported categorically. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Number of Eyes With Absolute Rotation of IOL Meridian by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
IOL orientation was measured with slit-lamp photography. IOL rotation was defined as the difference between axis of IOL orientation on the day of surgery and the subsequent postoperative visit. IOL rotation was measured in degrees and is reported categorically. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. BCDVA is reported categorically using the Snellen fraction, which compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with the correction obtained from manifest refraction testing. UCDVA is reported categorically using the Snellen fraction, which compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). The Snellen fraction compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Visual Acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). The Snellen fraction compares the participant's result to the result expected from a 'normal' visual system. The numerator represents the distance between the participant and the chart, and the denominator represents the distance at which a person with 'normal' vision would be able to discern the same letter size. 20/20 is considered to be 'normal' vision, whereas visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (Day 0 operative), Day 1 postoperative, Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Number of Eyes With Preservation of BCDVA at Month 1 and Month 3
Time Frame: Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Preservation of BCDVA was defined in terms of lines lost when reading the ETDRS chart at each visit compared to the prior best-achieved BCDVA. Loss of < 1 line included subjects with less than a 1 line loss, no change or improvement in BCDVA. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Week 1 postoperative, Month 1 postoperative, Month 3 postoperative
Number of Ocular Adverse Events Through Month 3
Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative
Ocular adverse events were identified as outlined in ISO 11979-2014 Annex B. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Up to Month 3 postoperative
Number of Device Deficiencies Post Implantation
Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative
A Device Deficiency (DD) was defined as a failure of the device to meet its performance specifications or expectations, or otherwise not perform as intended. This could include either a malfunction or damage to the device or any part thereof, regardless of the source of malfunction or damage, including user error, and regardless of the presence of injury (or lack thereof) to subject, user, or bystander. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Up to Month 3 postoperative
Number of Secondary Surgical Interventions, Other Than Intraroperative Optic Exchange and Rotational Adjustment of the Toric Optic in Cohort 2
Time Frame: Up to Month 3 postoperative
A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure that occurred after primary implantation and was conducted for the purpose of resolving residual refractive error (RRE) and optimizing visual outcomes. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Up to Month 3 postoperative
Percent Change in Endothelial Cell Count (ECC) at Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Month 3 postoperative
High quality images of the corneal endothelium (the single layer of cells on the inner surface of the cornea) were taken at the investigative site and sent to an independent central reading center for evaluation. A negative percent change value may indicate a decrease in the ability of the endothelium to maintain its primary function. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Baseline (preoperative), Month 3 postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sr. Clinical Trial Lead, CDMA Surgical, Alcon Research, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 18, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on HARMONI® Modular Intraocular Lens System

Subscribe