Vitamin D Supplements on Markers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: an Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

March 1, 2016 updated by: Karin Swart, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Markers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: an Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This meta-analysis will be conducted to study the effect on vitamin D supplements on markers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes using individual participant data from 12 RCTs. Given that previous data suggest that vitamin D supplementation might be most effective in those individuals with very low 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and potentially harmful in those achieving very high levels after vitamin D supplementation, this meta-analyses will be performed in subgroups according 25(OH)D levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently on-going to evaluate non-skeletal effects of vitamin D supplementation in the general older population. The results of these studies can be expected in 2017 to 2020 and while they will report important data, they may still leave knowledge gaps on the effects of vitamin D on clinically relevant surrogate parameters in specific groups. Recent data indicate that the association of vitamin D status and outcome is U- or reverse J-shaped and may be modified by the presence of certain risk factors or genetic variations of the vitamin D receptor.

This work is part of the European Union-project 'Food-based solutions for eradication of vitamin D deficiency and health promotion throughout the life cycle' (ODIN). This individual patient meta-analysis of existing high quality vitamin D RCTs aims to evaluate whether there are beneficial or harmful vitamin D effects on surrogate parameters for clinical outcomes (i.e. blood pressure, lipids, parathyroid hormone (PTH), fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)). With data from almost 3000 randomized subjects from 12 RCTs that are available within this consortium, the investigators will have sufficient power to detect clinically relevant effects of vitamin D supplementation on risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Subgroup analyses will investigate effect modifiers to evaluate whether certain groups of individuals experience pronounced or attenuated effects from vitamin D supplementation. Given that previous data suggest that vitamin D supplementation might be most effective in those individuals with very low 25(OH)D and potentially harmful in those achieving very high levels after vitamin D supplementation, this individual patient data meta-analyses will be performed in subgroups with serum 25(OH)D levels <30, 40, and 50 nmol/L and >100, 125 and 150 nmol/L. 25(OH)D levels will be re-measured to ensure comparability.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2945

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participating RCTs are the Tromso IGT, Tromso OBESITY, Tromso BMD, Tromso CLAMP, Tromso DEPRESSION, Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial, Paravit, Oosterwerff, Chel, Wicherts, UCC1, and UCC2 trials.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Availability of quality bio-banked samples for uniform 25(OH)D re-measurement
  • Prospective data on one or more of the outcomes
  • Willingness to collaborate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Trials among pregnant women, children, or performed in patient populations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Tromso Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) study
RCT on 20000 IU vitamin D3/week versus placebo for 1 year among persons with impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose.
Tromso OBESITY study
RCT on 20000 or 40000 IU vitamin D3/week plus 500 mg calcium/day versus placebo plus 500 mg calcium/day for 1 year among persons with a high body mass index.
Tromso Bone Mineral Density (BMD) study
RCT on 40000 IU vitamin D3/week plus 800 IU/day and 1000 mg calcium/day versus placebo plus 800 IU/day and 1000 mg calcium/day for 1 year among women with a low bone mineral density.
Tromso CLAMP study
RCT on 40000 IU vitamin D3/week versus placebo for 6 months among persons with 25(OH)D values <42 nmol/L.
Tromso DEPRESSION study
RCT on 40000 IU vitamin D3/week versus placebo for 6 months among persons with 25(OH)D values <55 nmol/L.
Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial
RCT on 2800 IU vitamin D3/day versus placebo for 8 weeks among persons a history of arterial hypertension and 25(OH)D values <75 nmol/L.
Paravit study
RCT on 7000 IU vitamin D3/day versus placebo for 6 months among persons with a high body mass index and 25(OH)D values <50 nmol/L.
Oosterwerff study
RCT on 1200 IU vitamin D3/day plus 500 mg calcium/day versus placebo plus 500 mg calcium/day for 16 weeks among non-western immigrants with pre-diabetes and 25(OH)D values <50 nmol/L.
Chel study
RCT on 600 IU vitamin D3/day (or daily equivalent) versus placebo for 4 months among nursing home residents >70 years of age.
Wicherts study
RCT on 800 IU vitamin D3/day versus 100,000 IU/3 months versus sunlight advice for 6 months among non-western immigrants with 25(OH)D values <25 nmol/L.
University College Cork (UCC) 1 study
RCT on 200, 400, or 600 IU vitamin D3/day versus placebo for 22 weeks among persons > 63 years of age.
UCC 2 study
RCT on 200, 400, or 600 IU vitamin D3/day versus placebo for 22 weeks among persons 20-40 years of age.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Systolic and diastolic (Main outcome of cardiovascular markers)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
HbA1c
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
(Main outcome of diabetic markers)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
High-density lipoproteins (HDL) cholesterol
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Total cholesterol
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Triglycerides
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Parathyroid hormone (PTH)
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Parathyroid hormone
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Fasting glucose
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Fasting insulin
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
C-peptide
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
Two-hour glucose
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)
After oral glucose tolerance test
Participants were followed for the duration of the intervention period (range 8 weeks - 1 year, depending on the RCT in which they are participating)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Subscribe