Determination of ED90 of Intrathecal Lidocaine for Adequate Anesthesia for Elective Cervical Cerclage Surgery

January 22, 2018 updated by: Paloma Toledo, Northwestern University
Cervical incompetence complicates approximately 1 in 500 pregnancies . Those women with cervical incompetence are at risk for second trimester spontaneous abortion and preterm labor. Cervical cerclage reduces these risks but must be performed under general or neuraxial anesthesia. Some anesthesiologists prefer neuraxial anesthesia, as it reduces fetal exposure to medications and avoids the risks associated with loss of maternal airway reflexes under general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia, in particular, has the added advantage of being technically simple while still providing a rapid, dense sensory block. For cerclage placement, patients require a sensory block from the T10 to S4 dermatome in order to cover sensation from the cervix as well as the vagina and perineum. Patients presenting for cerclage under spinal anesthesia pose a dosing challenge given the physiologic changes associated with pregnancy. As women progress with their pregnancy, they require lower doses of intrathecal local anesthetic to achieve similar block level. Multiple studies have demonstrated that these changes start during the second trimester. Inadequate sensory coverage with a spinal anesthetic typically necessitates conversion to general anesthesia, causing additional time wasted and added risk to the patient and fetus. Anecdotally, this is the reason why some anesthesiologists choose general anesthesia for patients undergoing cerclage over a spinal anesthetic. As there is currently no literature determining the correct dosage for these patients, we propose a dose-response study to determine the ED90 of intrathecal lidocaine for adequate anesthesia for elective cervical cerclage placement.The findings of this study will help determine the minimum dose of intrathecal lidocaine necessary to provide adequate spinal anesthesia for cervical cerclage for 90% of women. This will help decrease the frequency of inadequate anesthesia for cervical cerclage.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Prentice Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who is at least 18 years old
  • ASA physical class I or II
  • BMI <40 kg/m2,
  • Presents for elective cervical cerclage during their first or second trimester of pregnancy will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient who is not a candidate for neuraxial anesthesia (including coagulopathy,
  • Local skin infection, uncorrected hypovolemia)
  • Allergy to lidocaine or fentanyl
  • Chronic opioid user
  • History of failed neuraxial anesthesia or analgesia,
  • Had prior spine surgery
  • Can not assume a sitting position for spinal anesthesia due to risk of amniotic membrane rupture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spinal Lidocaine Administration

Spinal anesthesia will be induced with isobaric 2% lidocaine and 15 μg fentanyl.

The study lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). If the lidocaine dose provides an unsatisfactory anesthetic, the case will be categorized as a failure. After a failed case, the next participant will receive a lidocaine dose increased by 4 mg. If the lidocaine dose provides satisfactory anesthesia, the next participant's lidocaine dose will determined by a biased allocation method with a 90% chance of maintaining the dose and a 10% chance of decreasing the dose by 4 mg.
Drug: Lidocaine Administration
The lidocaine dose will be determined using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method. For the first participant, the starting dose will be 32 mg of 2% isobaric lidocaine (1.6 mL). Two outcomes will be possible: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia.
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine 2 % plus 15 μg fentanyl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to T 10 Level
Time Frame: 20 minutes after drug administration
Elapsed time in minutes to achieve T 10 level of anesthesia. Assessed by the anesthesia care provider using crushed ice. T 10 level is numbness up to the level of the belly button.
20 minutes after drug administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU0020134

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe