On the Impact of Common Sweetening Agents on Glucose Regulation, Cognitive Functioning and Gut Microbiota

June 22, 2016 updated by: Anne Nilsson, Lund University
The study intention is to investigate, in healthy humans, effects of 3 commonly used sweeteners on cardiometabolic risk markers, cognitive functions, and influences on gut microbiota composition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Healthy subjects will be included in a crossover study with the purpose to investigate effects of 3 commonly used sweeteners on cardiometabolic risk markers, cognitive functions, and influences on gut microbiota composition. The subjects will consume each test product for 14 days in a random order, separated by at least a two-week washout period. On the last day in each intervention period, i.e. at day fifteen, the last test portion will be consumed together with a standardized evening meal at 9.00 pm. Thereafter the subjects are fasting until arriving to the experimental unit. Upon arrival, test variables in blood will be determined at fasting and repeatedly for 3h postprandial a standardised breakfast served approximately at 8.00 am. Cognitive performance will be determined in the postprandial period with tests evaluating working memory capacity, selective attention, psychomotor reaction time, and executive functions. After each intervention period, faecal samples will be collected for characterization of gut microflora.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lund, Sweden, , SE-223 81 LUND
        • Food for Health Science Centre, Medicon Village, Lund University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy subjects
  • blood glucose <6.1
  • BMI <28
  • age between 40-70 years
  • normal diet
  • fluent in Swedish language (due to the structure of the cognitive tests).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes
  • cognitive decline (not able to cope with the cognitive tests)
  • metabolic syndrome
  • gastro-intestinal disorders
  • antibiotics or probiotics during the study period
  • smookers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sucrose
14 days intervention with daily intake of a beverage (1000 ml) including 66g sucrose.
Experimental: stevia glycosides
14 days intervention with daily intake of a beverage (1000ml) including 0.220 g stevia glycosides.
Experimental: saccharin
14 days intervention with daily intake of a beverage (1000ml) including 0.216g saccharin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental area under the curve (iAUC) (Glucose tolerance)
Time Frame: predose (standardised breakfast), 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min post dose.
The iAUC are determined after a standardized breakfast based on white wheat bread (50g available starch). The breakfast was commenced at time=0 and consumed within 10-12 min.
predose (standardised breakfast), 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min post dose.
Incremental area under the curve (iAUC) (insulin sensitivity).
Time Frame: predose, 0 (fasting), 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min post-dose.
The iAUC are determined after a standardized breakfast based on white wheat bread (50g available starch). The breakfast was commenced at time=0 and consumed within 10-12 min.
predose, 0 (fasting), 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min post-dose.
Working memory capacity
Time Frame: 80 min after the standardised breakfast
Working memory capacity determined with an oral working memory test composed of short sentences that can be semantically meaningful or not. 3-5 sentences are read to the subject. After each sentence the subject immediately has to reply if the sentence is semantically meaningful or not. After the set of 3-5 sentences the subjects have to recall the first noun in each of the sentences. One test is composed of 12 set with (3-5) sentences.
80 min after the standardised breakfast
Glut microbiota composition
Time Frame: baseline and after 14 days intervention
faecal samples are collected at baseline prior to the study and after each 14 day intervention period
baseline and after 14 days intervention
Working memory capacity
Time Frame: 120 min
Working memory capacity determined with an oral working memory test composed of short sentences that can be semantically meaningful or not. 3-5 sentences are read to the subject. After each sentence the subject immediately has to reply if the sentence is semantically meaningful or not. After the set of 3-5 sentences the subjects have to recall the first noun in each of the sentences. One test is composed of 12 set with (3-5) sentences.
120 min
Working memory capacity
Time Frame: 160 min
Working memory capacity determined with an oral working memory test composed of short sentences that can be semantically meaningful or not. 3-5 sentences are read to the subject. After each sentence the subject immediately has to reply if the sentence is semantically meaningful or not. After the set of 3-5 sentences the subjects have to recall the first noun in each of the sentences. One test is composed of 12 set with (3-5) sentences.
160 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Nilsson, PhD, Food for Health Science Centre, Lund University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015/57

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Subjects

Clinical Trials on Sucrose

Subscribe