Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Efficacy of Acupuncture for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) affects many adult men worldwide. So far, available therapies offer little or no proven benefit to CP/CPPS. The investigators design and implement this study is to assess efficacy of acupuncture therapy performed in the CP/CPPS .

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-center, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing acupuncture and placebo needle among patients with CP/CPPS, which will be conducted in Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Yantai Chinese Medicine Hospital from November 2015 to May 2017. 68 patients will be recruited in total through the advertisements spreading by newspaper, television and internet. After participants have completed a baseline evaluation and meet the selection criteria, one professional statistician uninvolved with treatment and data collection will assigns the participants by using a computer generated, blocked random allocation sequence randomly and acupuncturist will be blinded to the process of randomized assignment.Treatment group will use acupuncture and control group will use placebo needle, for treatment, Zhongliao (BL 33), Shenshu (BL 23), Guiyang (BL 35), Sanyinjiao (SP 6) acupuncture points will be used, the treatment sessions are 24 weeks after baseline, 3 times a week and each time the patients will accept a 30 minutes treatment, to control group, participants will receive placebo needle treatment at the same acupuncture points and the duration and frequency of sessions are same to the real acupuncture group. The primary outcome measure of this study is the decreasing in (National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index) NIH-CPSI total score from baseline to week 8, and secondary outcomes include NIH-CPSI sub scales at week, (International Prostate Symptom Score) IPSS total score, Global response assessment, expectation degree and satisfaction degree. The first three secondary outcomes will be measured at 4,8,20 and 32 weeks, expectation degree will be measured at baseline, and the satisfaction degree will be measure at 8, 20, 32 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. History of pain perceived in the region of the prostate and absence of other lower urinary tract pathology for a minimum of 3 out of the past 6 months. In addition, associated lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual function, psychological factors should be addressed.
  2. Age 18 to 50 years
  3. NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score≥ 15 (scale 0-43, and 0 means no symptom).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other urologic disease (for example, acute prostatitis, bacterial prostatitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, urinary tuberculosis, urinary tract infection)
  2. Serious or acute diseases with heart, liver, kidney and blood system.
  3. Patients who had received acupuncture or medication (including alpha-blockers or pain killers) treatment in the week prior to the baseline assessment
  4. Patients without telephone number who cannot be connected during the follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acupuncture
Zhongliao (BL 33), Shenshu (BL 23), Huiyang (BL 35), and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) acupuncture points (Table 1). After patients are in prone position with relax, the investigators will use 75% alcohol pads to sterile the skin around the acupuncture points, and then insert steel needles (Huatuo, Suzhou, China 0.3mm*40mm/0.3mm*75mm) into the acupuncture points. For bilateral Zhongliao (BL 33), the needle will be inserted into about 50-60mm with 45 degree, for Huiyang (BL 35), the needle will be inserted into 50-60mm. for Shenshu (BL 23) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6), the needles will be inserted vertically to a depth of 25-30 mm. The treatment sessions are 24 after baseline, 3 times a week, and the each time the patients will accept a 30 minutes treatment.
Acupuncture is one of the oldest standardized neuromodulatory therapies. The method of acupuncture treatment involves the insertion of needles in acupuncture points according to a system of channels and meridians. The needles are stimulated by manual manipulation, electrical stimulation or heat. The general theory of acupuncture is based on the premise that there are patterns of energy flow through the body that are essential for health. Disruptions of this flow are believed to be responsible for disease. Acupuncture may correct imbalances of flow at identifiable points close to the skin.
Other Names:
  • needle
Placebo Comparator: placebo needle
The participants in placebo needle group will receive placebo needle at the same acupuncture points to treatment group. Investigators will use a sort of blunt needle that cannot penetrate skin and stimulate deep tissues while the thrusting and twisting manipulation will be used by acupuncturists to mock the treatment procedure and blind the patients. The duration and frequency of sessions are same to the treatment group.
Placebo needle is a type of control without skin penetration based on the application of placebo needles with blunt needle tips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NIH-CPSI total score and change from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, week 1-8
baseline, week 1-8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NIH-CPSI subscales score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4,8,20,32
Baseline, week 4,8,20,32
NIH-CPSI total score in follow-up
Time Frame: week 20,32
week 20,32
IPSS total score and change from baseline
Time Frame: baseline, week 4,8,20,32
baseline, week 4,8,20,32
Global response assessment improvement
Time Frame: week 4,8,20,32
week 4,8,20,32
expectations degree
Time Frame: baseline
The expectations that acupuncture might help participants CP/CPPS at baseline. This scale includes two brief questions to investigate whether patients believe acupuncture treatment and if acupuncture may help CP/CPPS. The investigators designed this scale and the investigators want to explore the impact of variable that are potentially associated with placebo effects, namely will participants' expectations be treatment effect modifier?
baseline
Degree of satisfaction
Time Frame: week 8,20,32
The investigators designed this scale, which include 5 grades answer from 0 to 4, means "not at all" "a little" "Quite satisfied" "satisfaction" "very satisfaction"and the investigators want to use this to test blinding of participants.
week 8,20,32

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhishun Liu, PhD, Guang'anmen hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Prostatitis

Clinical Trials on Acupuncture

3
Subscribe