Regional Implementation of Collaborative Lung Function Testing (e-Spiro-HC3)

March 1, 2019 updated by: Felip Burgos, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Background/Aims There is evidence indicating that deployment of forced spirometry (FS) testing in a collaborative scenario, encompassing respiratory specialists and community professionals, generates healthcare efficiencies. The study describes the roadmap for regional implementation of the FS program in Catalonia (ES), from January to December 2016.

Methods/Design Firstly, the FS program will be deployed in three healthcare sectors (514 k inhabitants), following Plan-Do-Study-Act iterative cycles, using the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine for evaluation purposes. Thereafter, regional deployment of the FS program (7.5M inhabitants) will be conducted. The third step considers: evaluation of transferability, preparation for data analytics and recommendations for long-term assessment of outcomes. Main components of the FS program are: i) Automatic quality testing; ii) Standardized data transfer to a shared electronic health record; iii) Elaboration of individual FS reports including historical results; and, iv) Clinical decision support systems providing access to the FS report, and to remote support upon request.

Discussion/Conclusions The project constitutes the first attempt to scale-up a collaborative scenario for FS testing that will open new avenues for longitudinal lung function assessment. Moreover, the setting shows high potential for transferability to different sites and to other diagnostic procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Forced Spirometry program emerges from a series of studies reporting on technological solutions for each of the main components indicating the potential of their articulated application aiming at covering unmet needs for collaborative FS testing. The studies were initiated within the EU project NEXES22;23 and specific parts of the overall setting have already been successfully evaluated in the Basque Country.

The setting & Study design The current protocol has been designed as part of the regional deployment of integrated care services in Catalonia. It consists of the two lines of activity ultimately aiming at: i) regional adoption of the FS program; and, ii) generalization of the approach to other areas, as well as to other testing procedures. The research was submitted and apoved by the Ethical Committee of the Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona.

Program deployment The initial 6 months will include three healthcare sectors: Lleida (168k inhabitants and 21 Primary Care centers), Vic (49k inhabitants and 11 PCC), and Atenció Integral en Salut Barcelona Esquerra (AISBE) (540k inhabitants and 19 PCC) following a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology24. The first PDSA cycle (January - March 2016) including a total of three primary care centers, one in each healthcare sector, has as main purpose to ensure full functionality of the setting. Immediately thereafter, the FS program will be progressively deployed to all Primary Care centers in the three sectors in a second 3-months PDSA cycle that will be completed by mid-2016. Forced spirometry testing will be prescribed by the attending general practitioner following standard criteria and it will be carried out by primary care nurses.

The deployment of the program in the entire region (7.5M inhabitants and 369 Primary Care centers) will be completed with no discontinuation within 2016. It will follow identical PDSA methodology. The outcomes of the assessment carried out during each PDSA cycle will modulate the long-term assessment strategy of the FS program described below.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Felip Burgos
        • Contact:
          • Felip Burgos, PhD, RN
          • Phone Number: 34932275540
          • Email: fburgos@ub.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The initial 6 months will include 3 healthcare sectors: Lleida (168k inhabitants, 21 Primary Care Centers), Vic (49k inhabitants, 11 PCC), and AISBE (540k inhabitants, 19 PCC) following a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology. The first PDSA cycle (January - March 2016) including a total of 3 PCC, one in each healthcare sector, has as main purpose to ensure full functionality of the setting. The FS program will be progressively deployed to all PCC in the 3 sectors in a second 3-months PDSA cycle that will be completed by mid-2016. FS testing will be prescribed by general practitioner following standard criteria and it will be carried out by primary care nurses. The deployment in the entire region (7.5M inhabitants and 369 Primary Care centers) will be completed within 2016.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients included in the regular practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical an Medical exclusion criteria as the forced spirometry standards recommend.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lleida Health Sector

Lleida (168k inhabitants and 21 Primary Care centers). Primary Care centers from this health sector

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records No interventions performed

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records
Other Names:
  • Follow up using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology
Vic Health Sector

Vic (49k inhabitants and 11 Primary Care Centers). Primary Care centers from this health sector

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records No interventions performed

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records
Other Names:
  • Follow up using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology
AISBE Health Sector

Atenció Integral en Salut Barcelona Esquerra (AISBE) (540k inhabitants and 19 Primary Care centers). Primary Care centers from this health sector

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records No interventions performed

Inclusion of the Forced Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records
Other Names:
  • Follow up using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Primary Care Centers (PCC) and professionals involved in the territory using the Electronic Health Records (EHR)
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Number of PCC exporting both the raw spirometric data, including all FS curves, and the FS report to the shared electronic health record at a regional level.
Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Number of professionals using Forced Spirometry included in the EHR (percentage per PCC)
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Number of professionals with accessi of the FS testing report, irrespective of the healthcare provider and health level wherein testing was performed
Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Change between inicial and end of the project (number of FS test included in the EHR)
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Thought study completition in average of 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forced Spirometry Parameters
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
- Measured in liters
Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Grade of quality in relation of total Forced Spirometry
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Percentage of patients with FS grade of quality (A-B-C-D-F) in relation of total FS
Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Change from baseline in relations with ascertainment of COPD or Asthma diagnosis
Time Frame: Thought study completition in average of 18 months
  • Percentage of patients with FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 and without diagnosis of Asthma and COPD
  • Percentage of patients with FEV1/FVC ratio > 0.7 and with diagnosis Asthma and COPD
  • Percentage of patients with restrictive pattern and FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7
Thought study completition in average of 18 months
Number of participants per PCC
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Long-term benefits from data analytics of longitudinal information

Assessments using unique measurements

Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Grade of satisfaction about new servicies
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Grade of satisfaction about new servicies (0-10)
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Rating the degree of clinical impact to obtain the historical spirometry values of each patient.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Rating the degree of clinical impact to obtain the historical spirometry values of each patient. Grade 0 -10
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Number of avoided duplication tests using the EHR
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Number of avoided duplication tests using the EHR. measured as % of the total FS
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Cost-effectiveness (Rating usability and speed of data transfer)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Rating usability and speed of data transfer in minutes .
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Cost-effectiveness (reducing the time of access to information and better display of the information)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Questionnaire about reducing the time of access to information and better display of the information (measured in minutes).
Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-PDMAR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Integrated Care

Clinical Trials on Inclusion of Spirometry into the Electronic Health Records

3
Subscribe