Performance and Team Pre-critical Staff Before Critical Event in High Fidelity Simulation for Anesthesiology Residents (Simstaf&perf)

Improvement of Team Performance With a Pre-critical Staff Within the Team Prior to Admission of Critical Simulated Patient in High Fidelity Simulation Session for Anesthesiology Resident During Their Education Curriculum

Simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur and plannification of team resources and priority in the treatment strategy may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a liberal preparation team staff of 4 min, suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Healthy
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: precritical staff

Detailed Description

High fidelity simulated environment allowed safe learning of critical events and knowledge of appropriate response and treatment. Anesthesiology resident education curriculum in Lyon plans several high fidelity simulation session with a large panel of critical events. Anticipation of critical events before they may occur, plannification of team resources, priority in the treatment strategy and effective communication within the team, may help to improve team performance during the scenario. The investigators' goal is to compare team performance during the scenario with or without a preparation team staff of 4 min. This staff will be suggested after the briefing of the scenario but before the scenario starts. The investigators are going to compare groups of anesthesiology residents going through same scenarios of simulated critical events in high fidelity simulation session. Scenarios will be recorded to be analyzed by 2 reviewers independantly. A checklist of appropriate treatment and a non technical skill checklist will be use to cote team performance. Stress of the participants will be assessed by visual analogic scale of participants anxiety and stress. the two groups (preparation staff or no preparation staff) will be compare to see if improvement in team performance is associated with the intervention.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 44
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• France
  • Rhône-Alpes
    • Lyon, Rhône-Alpes, France, 69007
      • CLESS

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Anesthesiology resident in the education simulation curriculum

Exclusion Criteria:

• no verbal consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: precritical staff; 4 min of precritical team staff for anticipation of risk and role attribution during the critical events if they occur. athe staff will take place after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario.	Behavioral: precritical staff; free pre critical scenario team staff
No Intervention: control; screening of normal labs results during 4 min, after briefing of the scenario and before the start of the scenario

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
performance	performance scale cotation (rated from 0 to 100 by 2 independant experts) (technikal and non technikal skills scale)	one week (review video)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
stress	visual analogic scale (transfer to metrics from 0 to 100) of the stress felt by the residents at the time of the cotation	min 0, min 4 and min 15 (just after the scenario)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Claude Bernard University
• Investigators: Study Chair: jean jacques lehot, PHD, CLESS

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 4, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 5, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): November 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 2, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 27, 2020
• Last Verified: February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: behaviour
• Other Study ID Numbers: CLESS 2015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED