Evaluation of Staff COVID-19 Wellbeing Centres in a Healthcare Workplace: COVID-WELL Study (COVID-WELL)

August 26, 2021 updated by: Holly Blake, University of Nottingham

Evaluation of a Workplace Intervention to Implement Supported COVID-19 Wellbeing Centres in a Healthcare Workplace During and After the Coronavirus Pandemic: The COVID-WELL Study

Evaluation of a workplace intervention to implement supported wellbeing centres in a healthcare workplace during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mixed-Methods Evaluation study - including collection of service use monitoring data, online survey and qualitative interviews.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Project Aims:

  1. To describe the cost, reach and usage of the Staff Wellbeing Centres
  2. To gather insight into experiences of those who access the facility ('service users') as well as those of support workers ('wellbeing buddies').
  3. To identify any facilitators, obstacles or barriers to accessing the facility.
  4. To identify perceptions of facility users and non-users towards the value of the facilities during and after the coronavirus pandemic.
  5. To establish recommendations for longer-term sustainability of the wellbeing centres.

Interviews will be conducted with up to 45 interview participants (10-15 Wellbeing Buddies, 25-30 Staff).

Online survey will be conducted - all Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) staff invited to take part (>14,000).

The survey will include measures of mental wellbeing (Warwick-Edinburgh Wellbeing Scale, 14-item - license received), and single items measures of job stressfulness, job satisfaction, presenteeism, turnover intentions and work engagement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

819

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
        • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • National Health Service staff which includes employees, volunteers or healthcare students, as well as bank staff (all have access to the Staff Wellbeing Centres).
  • Ability to give informed consent. For survey element: Ability to access the internet (to complete the online survey) For interview element: Ability to attend an individual interview.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to communicate in spoken English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Staff Wellbeing Centre
Wellbeing Centres are rooms where staff employed at the hospital trust can go for a break, rest, relaxation, quiet time out, advice support or signposting. They are manned by Wellbeing Buddies who are support workers who offer advice and signposting services. The Centres are accessible to all staff at the Trust.
2 Centres (rooms) accessible to staff for rest and relaxation, work breaks, supports advice and signposting. They are manned by support workers called Wellbeing Buddies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
14-item scale to measure mental wellbeing. Total scores range from 14 to 70 and higher scores indicate greater positive mental wellbeing.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Single Item Measure of Global Job Stressfulness (Houdmont et al, 2019)
Time Frame: Baseline
Single-item measure. Scores range from 1 to 5 and higher scores indicated greater job stressfulness.
Baseline
Single Item Global Job Satisfaction Measure (Dolbier et al, 2005)
Time Frame: Baseline
Single-item measure. Scores range from 1 to 5 and higher scores indicated greater job satisfaction.
Baseline
Single Item Measure of Presenteeism (Aronsson & Gustafsson, 2004)
Time Frame: Baseline
Single-item measure. Scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater presenteeism.
Baseline
Single Item Measure of Turnover intentions (Ryan et al, 2017)
Time Frame: Baseline
Single-item measure. Scored 1=no intent to leave, 2=intent to leave
Baseline
Work Engagement (Shaufeli et al, 2006)
Time Frame: Baseline
Dedication subscale of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (3 items will be used: 2, 3 and 4). Scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater work engagement.
Baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative Interviews with Staff
Time Frame: Once per study, telephone interview (during a 6-week interview period)
Users and non-users of Wellbeing Centres
Once per study, telephone interview (during a 6-week interview period)
Qualitative Interviews with Wellbeing Buddies
Time Frame: Once per study, telephone interview (during a 6-week interview period)
Support Workers within the Wellbeing Centres
Once per study, telephone interview (during a 6-week interview period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COVID-WELL_May20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Interview data will be made available on request (after study end).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Interview data will be available on request at study end (after publication of findings).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

On request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1

Clinical Trials on Staff Wellbeing Centres

Subscribe