Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dementia (rTMS for demen)

September 17, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
The purpose is to is to study if repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves cognitive function in patients with neurodegenerative conditions which may manifest as mild to moderate cognitive impairment and, in late phase, dementia. This study also intends to investigate if the responses to rTMS intervention are either positively or negatively correlated with the initial severity of cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary hypothesis is that rTMS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will lead to improved memory, language and executive function compared to patients who receive a sham, control treatment. The improvement is defined as having higher performance on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II). Secondary Hypotheses are that:

  • 1: rTMS- will lead to higher performance on secondary cognitive measures relating to executive function and naming compared to performance by participants in the sham treatment group at the termination of treatment; and that
  • 2: rTMS-induced memory improvement parallels changes in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1207
        • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans aged 55 years or older
  • Diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia likely due to Alzheimer's disease.
  • Ability to obtain a Motor Threshold, determined during the screening process.
  • With an adequately stable condition and living environment to enable attendance at scheduled clinic visits.
  • If on a prescription medication for cognition that medication dose will be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization into the study and participant will be willing to remain on a stable regimen during the acute treatment phase.
  • Able to read, verbalize understanding, and voluntarily sign the Informed Consent Form to be signed by the participant, or a designated legal representative when the participant lacks decision making capacity prior to participating in any study- specific procedures or assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prior exposure to rTMS or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
  • Unable to safely withdraw, at least two weeks prior to treatment commencement, from medications that substantially increase the risk of having seizures.
  • Have a cardiac pacemaker or a cochlear implant.
  • Have an implanted device deep brain stimulation or metal in the brain
  • Current substance abuse not including caffeine or nicotine as determined by patient report or chart review.
  • Active current suicidal intent or plan as determined by patient report or chart review.
  • Current or Prior history of a seizure disorder as determined by patient report or chart review
  • Traumatic brain injury within the last two months
  • Participation in another concurrent interventional clinical trial
  • Known current psychosis as determined by patient report or chart review.
  • Current or prior history of a mass lesion, cerebral infarct or other non-cognitive, active central nervous system (CNS) disease that would increase the risk for seizure.
  • Not fluent in English or a hearing impairment severe enough to impair comprehension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham Comparator: sham
sham noise to block the sound of treatment
sham noise to block the sound of stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Changes of California verbal learning test scores (CVLT) from baseline after treatment and 4 months later.

CVLT is 16 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=16, higher the better memory).

Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Boston Naming After Treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Changes in Boston Naming Test (BNT) from baseline was analyzed. BNT is a 60 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=60, higher the better).
Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Changes in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatment
Time Frame: within a week following the last treatment session and 4 months later

Changes in BDNF plasma levels (pg/ml) from baseline were analyzed after treatment.

BDNF is a plasma biomarker, minimum=0, no maximum. Higher number means more BDNF synthesis).

within a week following the last treatment session and 4 months later
Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Animal Fluency (AF) is a scoring system to assess the ability to generate a list of related words.

The score is the number of animals the examinee can name in one minute time. (Minimum = 0, No maximum, higher the better).

Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Trail making B is a scoring system for the assessment of the mental flexibility, processing speed and executive function. The score is the time (in seconds) it takes for the examinee to draw line segments connecting sequentially from 1-A-2-B-3....all the way to12-L-13. (The lower score means faster speed and means better performance. The minimum is (hypothetically) zero. There is no maximum. However, in some test centers, the maximum allowed time is 200 seconds.
Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)
Time Frame: assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 4-month post-treatment follow up
A piece of paper with 6 simple drawings is presented to the subject for 10 seconds. The subject is then asked to draw these drawings from memory. The process is repeated three times to assess visual memory and learning. Each correct drawing scores two pints. Maximum score for three trials is 36. Minimum score is 0. Higher the better.
assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 4-month post-treatment follow up
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

MoCA is a one page, 30 point cognitive screening test. It test the following cognitive domains:

  1. short-term memory (5 points)- two learning trials of five nouns and delayed recall after approximately five minutes.
  2. visuospatial abilities - clock-drawing task (3 points) and copy a cube (1 point).
  3. executive functions - alternation task abbreviated trail-making B (1 point), and a two-item verbal abstraction task (2 points).
  4. attention, concentration, and working memory - a sustained attention task (target detection using tapping; 1 point), a serial subtraction task (3 points), and digits forward and backward (1 point each).
  5. language - three-item confrontation naming (3 points), repetition of two sentences (2 points), and verbal fluency (1 point).
  6. abstract reasoning - describe the similarity of tasks (2 points).
  7. orientation to time and place (6 points). Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 30. Higher the better.
Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jauhtai J Cheng, MD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on RTMS

Subscribe