Conventional and Molecular Diagnostic Method for Patients With Suspected UTI

October 3, 2017 updated by: Southwest Regional PCR, LLC

Conventional and Molecular Diagnostic Method for Patients With Suspected Urinary Tract Infections: Clinical, Economic, and Quality of Life Outcomes

In this protocol, the investigators are examining the use of a novel pathogen testing technology and method of identification of antibiotic susceptibility against the conventional C & S testing for patients with both complicated and uncomplicated UTIs. The investigators will examine the two modes in terms of objective patient related outcomes, i.e. 1) diagnostic accuracy and degree of detail of final analysis; 2) time to resolution of symptoms; 3) quality of life as defined by particularly symptomology and "bothersomeness" of the symptoms; and 4) overall cost.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age greater than or equal to 18 and less than or equal to 89 years.

    • The PI suspects the patient has a complicated or uncomplicated UTI that requires urine testing to confirm diagnosis
    • Able to provide at least 8 ml urine total (urine for 2 pathology tests).
    • Is willing to complete one follow up surveys and send back to FH.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent.

    • Unable to read and write English (surveys are not available or validated in any other language than English).
    • Currently on any antibiotic for any clinical indication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A-Culture and Sensitivity group
Diagnosis by Culture and Sensitivity group-Treatment based on the results of the FH C & S testing - Odd Numbers on randomization table
Treatment based on the results of the FH C & S testing - Odd Numbers on randomization table
Active Comparator: B-Diagnosis by Molecular Testing
Diagnosis by Molecular Testing-Treatment based on the results of the PathoGenius molecular testing - Even Numbers on randomization table
Treatment based on the results of the FH C & S testing - Odd Numbers on randomization table

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To quantify differences in the relative abundance and presence of microbial lineages as determined by culture and sequencing technologies.
Time Frame: 1 year
comparison of culture and sensitivity results to the molecular results
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time (as measured in hours) to preliminary and final identification of organism(s) and antibiotic sensitivity(s) results
Time Frame: 1 year
time from collection of sample to diagnostic result delivery
1 year
Time from participant reported start of UTI symptoms to resolution.
Time Frame: 1 year
collect time of reported UTI from Subject
1 year
Participant Quality of Life as measured by a UTI specific severity and bothersome of symptoms survey taken at baseline (at clinic visit) and at set time points post urine testing
Time Frame: 1 year
collect data from Subject as outlined in the Quality of Life Assessment
1 year
Overall cost
Time Frame: 1 year
collect data on the overall cost of Subject treatment
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael McDonald, MD, Florida Hospital Celebration Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PATUTI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infections-UTI

Clinical Trials on culture versus Molecular diagnostics

Subscribe