Analyzing the Effect of Trunk Training on Limbs in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy (FTT)

December 30, 2015 updated by: Abant Izzet Baysal University

Analyzing the Effect of Functional Trunk Training on Upper and Lower Limb Motor Function in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

The purpose of this study is to analyze if trunk training has effects on trunk, upper, lower extremity motor functions in children with spastic Cerebral Palsy. Second purpose is to analyze the relation between trunk control and prematurity, birth weight, upper and lower extremity motor functions in children with spastic Cerebral Palsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a condition caused by a lesion occurred in immature brain during prenatal, natal or postnatal period. Children with CP may have motor, cognitive, sensory, auditory, behavioral problems during their lifespan. Spastic type CP is most common type of CP and many children with spastic CP have both trunk and limb impairment. Physiotherapy is very important for improving motor function and protect from secondary impairments in this children and should start as early as possible. The aim of this study is to analyze if trunk training has effects on trunk, upper and lower extremity motor function in children with spastic CP. 38 children with spastic CP between 4-18 years age are included in this study. Both genders are included. The Participants randomized according to their gross motor function classification system levels and their age. Before intervention all groups assessed with assessment tools which assess muscle spasticity, balance, gross motor function, trunk control and walking characteristics. After randomization there wasn't any intervention for control group; they continued their regular physiotherapy in special education centers two times a week. Study group received trunk training two times a week in addition to their regular physiotherapy in special education centers during 8 weeks. After 8 weeks all groups assessed with the same assessment tools.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with spastic cerebral palsy effected bilaterally
  2. Between 4-18 years age

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Received orthopedic surgery during last 6 weeks
  2. Receive Botulinum Toxin injection during last 6 weeks
  3. Mentally retarded children with communication limitations
  4. Had epileptic seizures during last 12 moths -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional Trunk Training Group
Functional Trunk Training which includes strengthening of trunk muscle and functional activities including trunk region.
The intervention includes neurodevelopment treatment, muscle strengthening and functional activities of trunk region
No Intervention: Control Group
No intervention, the continued their regular physical therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in trunk control over time assessed with Trunk Control Measurement Scale.
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing change in trunk control
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in daily living activities and participation over time assessed with Child Health Questionary Parent Form 50.
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessment of child's daily living activities and participation
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in muscle activation over time assessed with Surface Electromyography.
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessment of muscle activation
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in muscle spasticity over time assessed with Modified Tardieu Scale.
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing muscle spasticity
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in gross motor function over time assessed with Gross Motor Function Measurement
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing gross motor function
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in upper extremity skills over time assessed with Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing upper extremity skills
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in loco motion over time assessed with Gillette Functional Assessment Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing loco motion.
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in walking parameters over time assessed with Physicians Rating Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing walking parameters
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in functional loco motion over time assessed with Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing functional loco motion
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in walking speed over time assessed with 1 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing walking speed
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in balance over time assessed with Pediatric Balance Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing balance
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in impact of having a disabled child on family over time assessed with Impact on Family Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing impact on family to have a disabled child
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Change in independence level over time assessed with Functional Independence Measure for Kids
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline
Assessing independence level
At baseline and 8 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mintaze KEREM GÜNEL, Professor, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Clinical Trials on Functional Trunk Training

Subscribe