Efficacy Assessment of CT-guided Hook Wire Localization of Lung Nodes Before Thoracoscopy (HARNO)

January 23, 2018 updated by: Centre Jean Perrin

Efficacy Assessment of CT-guided Hook Wire Localization of Lung Nodes With Medical Device " Fil d'Ariane " Laurane médical Before Thoracoscopy- HARNO Trial

When patient presents a lung node, there is an important risk that this node was a tumor. For patients who have these nodes, the surgery is the best treatment. When the surgery is possible, the thoracoscopy may be more advantageous compared to thoracothomy (decrease of post surgery pains, decrease of recovery time and decrease of drugs consumption). Nevertheless, thoracoscopy needs specific materiels and nécessite un équipement spécifique and trained physicians.

Moreover, this technic needs that nodes was well localized. For this, radiologists use CT-guided hook wire localization of these lung nodes before surgery.

TThe hook wire laying is delicate. It can lead secondaries effects as pneumothorax, dislodgement of the hook wire before and after surgery. The success rate of hook wire fixation in lung near of the node is primary.

The main objective of our study is to assess the success rate localization of node in surgery piece, that is to verify if the hook wire have allowed to localize the lung node in surgery piece.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

For lung cancer patients, the best treatment remains the surgery when tumor is localized.

When patient presents a lung node, there is an important risk that this node was a tumor. For patients who have these nodes, the surgery is the best treatment. When the surgery is possible, the thoracoscopy may be more advantageous compared to thoracothomy (decrease of post surgery pains, decrease of recovery time and decrease of drugs consumption). Nevertheless, thoracoscopy needs specific materiels and nécessite un équipement spécifique and trained physicians. In France, only 1% of surgeries qu'en France, thoracoscopy represents less than 1% of lung cancer surgeries while it represents 30% of interventions in Japan.

Moreover, this technic needs that nodes was well localized. For this, radiologists use CT-guided hook wire localization of these lung nodes before surgery.

According to the litterature, this localization technic is efficient (Chen et al, 2011).

The hook wire laying is delicate. It can lead secondaries effects as pneumothorax, dislodgement of the hook wire before and after surgery. The success rate of hook wire fixation in lung near of the node is primary.

The main objective of our study is to assess the success rate localization of node in surgery piece, that is to verify if the hook wire have allowed to localize the lung node in surgery piece. This implies that:

  • the hook wire was well CT-guided in the lung
  • the hook wire did not present a dislodgment before or during surgery
  • the hook wire is near of the node to be removed Among secondaries objectives, the investigators will assess the safety and possible complications which could occur. The investigators will also measure the distance between hook wire and center of the node

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Centre Jean Perrin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Patient with suspect lung node, needed surgery
  • Signed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Too deep node
  • Severe co-morbidities : respiratory insufficiency, cardiac insufficiency
  • Major emphysema
  • Patient with only one lung
  • Pregnant women
  • Breastfeeding women
  • Patient with cognitive and psychiatric troubles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention: Hook wire CT guided

There is only one arm. When patient undergo surgery , the radiologist will place a CT-guided Hook wire in order to localize it in patient lung. The intervention consists to place a CT-guided hook wire in contact with the pulmonary nodule under local anesthesia.

Then, the thoracoscopy will be realised. Then, the surgery piece will be examined to confirm if the node is in the surgery piece

The intervention consist to place a CT-guided hook wire in lung patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Nodule detection in surgery piece (success rate)
Time Frame: At surgery
At surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Nodule detection under scanner
Time Frame: After patient inclusion, at scan realisation, before surgery. This detection will be realised up to 4 weeks after inclusion.
After patient inclusion, at scan realisation, before surgery. This detection will be realised up to 4 weeks after inclusion.
Adverse events assessment graded with NCI -CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: Before and after surgery, up to 4 weeks after surgery
Before and after surgery, up to 4 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-A00958-41

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nodes, Lung

Clinical Trials on Hook wire CT guided

3
Subscribe