Pressure Wire Guided Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

April 3, 2017 updated by: Manav Sohal, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Guided by Invasive dP/dT: Radi-CRT Study

Heart failure patients may benefit from having a special pacemaker implanted that can make the heart pump in a more coordinated and efficient way Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT). For the heart to pump well it is necessary for the pacing wires to be placed in optimal positions. Only two thirds of people respond to CRT and this may be because of non-ideal pacing wire position. A potential marker for response is the change in heart pump pressure change over time. The aim of this study is to use a specialised wire in the main pumping chamber of the heart to record the pressure changes with the pacing lead in various positions to determine the optimal position. It is postulated that the improved pressure changes will increase the proportion of responders.

Pilot study work has shown that the work is technically feasible and safe. The initial data has been published in a highly regarded scientific journal. This main study will be a multicentre randomised controlled trial whereby patients will be randomised to either standard treatment or pressure wireguided treatment. The patients in the pressurewire guided arm will have a specialised wire implanted into the main pumping chamber of their heart via a blood vessel at the top of the leg (or less commonly a blood vessel in the wrist). This will measure acute pressure changes over time and the pacing lead will be positioned in the site that gives the greatest change in pressure.

If the patients in the pressurewire guided arm fare better than those receiving standard treatment it may alter how a large proportion of heart failure patients are treated around the world. The study requires 282 patients and is likely to take two years to complete.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

282

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Auxolgico
        • Contact:
          • Giovanni Prerego, MD
      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • San Rafaelle Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Nicoleta Sora, MD
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
        • Contact:
          • Francisco Leyva, MD
      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Bournemouth Hospital
        • Contact:
          • John Paisey
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • The Heart Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Pier Lambiase, MD
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Recruiting
        • Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation NHS Trust
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Manav Sohal, BSc, MBBS
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich
        • Contact:
          • Shoaib Hamid, MD
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Freeman Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Janet McCoomb, MD
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • John Radcliffe Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Tim Betts, MD
    • Kent
      • Gillingham, Kent, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Medway Maritime Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Shaumik Adhya, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients fulfilling standard criteria for CRT
  • Ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart failure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to pressure wire assessment including:
  • Severe aortic valve disease
  • Mechanical aortic valve replacement
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • LV thrombus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard CRT Implant
Active Comparator: Pressure-wire guided CRT Implant
A pressure wire will be sited in the left ventricle to measure dP/dT max. The LV lead position that gives the highest dP/dT max will be the final position used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of CRT responders at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in clinical composite score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in echo derived endsystolic volume (ESV) at six months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in echo derived enddiastolic colume (EDV) at six months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in echo derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month assessment of change in symptoms (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month change in 6 minute walk distance
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month change in VO2 max (CPET)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month change in ntProBNP
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month difference in hospital readmission (days)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Six month difference in mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Difference in rates of successful LV lead implantation
Time Frame: One week
One week
Difference in procedure duration
Time Frame: One week
One week
Difference in radiation dose
Time Frame: One week
One week
Difference in contrast dose
Time Frame: One week
One week
Procedural complications
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Standard CRT Implant

Subscribe