- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02662179
Are the Fried Criteria Predictive of a Functional Decline in Older People With Solid Malignant Tumors?
Identifying the frail elderly patients or those at risk of becoming frail has become a cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine. Many instruments have been developed to identify fragility at the individual level. The 'Fragile' phenotype defined by Fried is based on 5 criteria: weakness, slowness, low level of activity, exhaustion, and unintentional weight loss. The patient is fragile if it meets at least three out of five criteria. It is 'pre-fragile' if it meets one or two criteria.
In onco-geriatrics, the International onco-geriatrics society recommends the implementation of a 'G8 scale' to detect elderly patients at risk of fragility. People with a positive G8 are then referred to the geriatric team to benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment. This evaluation is interpreted by the geriatrician, who proposes an action plan to overcome the various problems of the elderly patient. The evaluation can also help the oncologist in the choice of treatment for the patient: palliative care, standard treatment or adapted treatment (No-go, Go-go or slow-go).
The investigators would like to assess if fragility as defined by the Fried criteria is predictive of a functional, physical or cognitive decline, or a loss of quality of life in patients treated for a solid malignant tumor.
Furthermore, they will assess if the frailness categorization has an impact on the oncologic treatment decision. Does the oncologist switches the patient's oncologic treatment after being informed of the frailness status ?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Identifying the frail elderly patients or those at risk of becoming frail has become a cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine. The term 'frail' has been elusive during quite a long time. Several studies have been conducted over the last 15 years to clarify this concept: fragility is a clinical syndrome defined by an increase of vulnerability following a decline in physiological reserves and organic functions, that compromises the ability to cope with daily life or acute stress.
Many instruments have been developed to identify fragility at the individual level. The 'Fragile' phenotype defined by Fried (Cardiovascular Health Study) is based on 5 criteria: weakness, slowness, low level of activity, exhaustion, and unintentional weight loss. The patient is fragile if it meets at least three out of five criteria. It is 'pre-fragile' if it meets one or two criteria.
In onco-geriatrics, the International onco-geriatrics society recommends the implementation of a 'G8 scale' to detect elderly patients at risk of fragility. People with a positive G8 are then referred to the geriatric team to benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment. This evaluation is interpreted by the geriatrician, who draws an action plan to overcome the various problems of the elderly patient. The evaluation also helps the oncologist in the choice of treatment for the patient: palliative care, standard treatment or adapted treatment (No-go, Go-go or slow-go).
However, many studies have shown that fragile patients had a greater morbidity and mortality than non-fragile patients. The rate of postoperative complications and the length of stay are significantly higher in fragile patients suffering from a colorectal cancer treated by elective surgery.
On the other hand and quite surprisingly, another study showed that none of the comprehensive geriatric assessment based fragility indicators was able to predict a post-surgery functional decline in patients having undergone surgery for colorectal cancer.
One of the primary goals of geriatry being to maintain the autonomy and independence of patients.
The investigators would thus like to assess if fragility as defined by the Fried criteria is predictive of a functional, physical or cognitive decline, or a loss of quality of life in patients treated for a solid malignant tumor.
Furthermore, they will assess if the frailness categorization has an impact on the oncologic treatment decision. Does the oncologist switches the patient's oncologic treatment after being informed of the frailness status ?
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brussels, Belgium, 1070
- Erasme hospital
-
Brussels, Belgium
- CHU Brugmann
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a solid malign tumor: ovary cancer, breast cancer, digestive cancer (colo-rectal, pancreas), lung cancer, urinary tract cancer (including bladder cancer).
- Patients having not undergone treatment yet (be it surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy)
- Ambulatory or hospitalized patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients unable to participate in the global geriatric evaluation (auditive or visual problems)
- Language barrier
- Clear therapeutic abstention
- Bedridden patients
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Other
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Elderly patients with solid tumors
The group will include elderly patients with a malignant solid tumor: ovary cancer, breast cancer, digestive cancer (colo-rectal, pancreas), lung cancer or urinary tract cancer (including bladder cancer).
|
Assess the quality of life ('SF-36' questionnaire) of patients 3 and 6 months after oncologic treatment.
Since a diagnosis of frailness will have been established before the oncologic treatment, a correlation between the decline and the 'frail' categorization according to the Fried criteria can be established or denied.
Assess functional decline ('Katz ADL' Score and 'Lawton IADL' Score) 3 and 6 months after oncologic treatment.
Since a diagnosis of frailness will have been established before the oncologic treatment, a correlation between the decline and the 'frail' categorization according to the Fried criteria can be established or denied.
Assess physical decline (walking speed and prehension force) 3 and 6 months after oncologic treatment.
Since a diagnosis of frailness will have been established before the oncologic treatment, a correlation between the decline and the 'frail' categorization according to the Fried criteria can be established or denied.
Assess cognitive decline 3 and 6 months ('MMSE 30' questionnaire) after oncologic treatment.
Since a diagnosis of frailness will have been established before the oncologic treatment, a correlation between the decline and the 'frail' categorization according to the Fried criteria can be established or denied.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional decline - Katz (ADL)
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
The functional decline will be assessed by using the Katz Basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Functional decline - Katz (ADL)
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
The functional decline will be assessed by using the Katz Basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Functional decline - Lawton (IADL)
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
The functional decline will be assessed by using the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Functional decline - Lawton (IADL)
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
The functional decline will be assessed by using the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Physical decline - walking speed
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the 'Timed Up and Go' test (TUG)
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Physical decline - walking speed
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the 'Timed Up and Go' test (TUG)
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Physical decline - prehension force
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Prehension force (Grip test) will be measured
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Physical decline - prehension force
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Prehension force (Grip test) will be measured
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Cognitive decline - MMSE 30
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the mini mental state evaluation (MMSE 30) questionnaire
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Cognitive decline - MMSE 30
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the mini mental state evaluation (MMSE 30) questionnaire
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Quality of life - SF 36
Time Frame: 3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire
|
3 months after oncologic treatment
|
Quality of life - SF36
Time Frame: 6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Will be assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire
|
6 months after oncologic treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Switch in oncologic treatment decision
Time Frame: Between diagnosis and oncologic treatment - maximum 8 weeks
|
Patients will be classified as frail, vulnerable or robust according to the Fried criteria.
Does the oncologist changes his/her therapeutic treatment decision after being aware of the frailness categorization ?
|
Between diagnosis and oncologic treatment - maximum 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Florence Rousseau, MD, CHU Brugmann
- Principal Investigator: Murielle Surquin, MD,PhD, CHU Brugmann
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Mar 19;9:433-41. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S45300. eCollection 2014.
- Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, Cohen HJ, Droz JP, Lichtman S, Mor V, Monfardini S, Repetto L, Sorbye L, Topinkova E; Task Force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Sep;55(3):241-52. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003.
- Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhoy MS, Skovlund E, Audisio RA, Johannessen HO, Bakka A, Wyller TB. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Dec;76(3):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
- Ronning B, Wyller TB, Jordhoy MS, Nesbakken A, Bakka A, Seljeflot I, Kristjansson SR. Frailty indicators and functional status in older patients after colorectal cancer surgery. J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Jan;5(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHUB-Fried
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Elderly Patients With a Solid Tumor
-
Peking University People's HospitalCompletedGastrointestinal Endoscopy | Elderly Patients | Remimazolam Besylate | Etomidate Combined With PropofolChina
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedElderly Patients Undergoing Trans Pars Plana Vitrectomy With General AnesthesiaKorea, Republic of
-
Elevar TherapeuticsBukwang Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd.CompletedCancer Patients With Solid TumorsKorea, Republic of, United States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonUnknownPatients With a Sutureless Aortic ValveFrance
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalNot yet recruitingPreoperative Nutritional Status and Risk Factors Associated With Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy
-
Peking University First HospitalPeking University People's Hospital; Peking University Third Hospital; Beijing... and other collaboratorsCompletedLong-term Outcome | Elderly Patients | Epidural Anesthesia | Solid Organ Cancer | Surgical ResectionChina
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCompletedPediatric Patients With Solid TumorsUnited States
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy...RecruitingPatients With Advanced Solid TumorsChina
-
Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingPatients With Advanced Solid TumorsChina
-
Bio-Thera SolutionsGeorge Clinical Pty LtdActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on Quality of life evaluation
-
University Hospital, BordeauxUnknown
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedQuality of Life | Children
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedOropharyngeal Cancer | Palate Free Flap ReconstructionFrance
-
University Hospital, MontpellierGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary HypertensionFrance
-
Fondation Hôpital Saint-JosephCompletedOsteoporotic FracturesFrance
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityHasan Kalyoncu University; University of Gaziantep; Acıbadem Adana HospitalRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleCompletedSevere Forms of Hemophilia | Other Constitutional Bleeding DisordersFrance
-
Sahar SalehiRecruiting
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedPatients With Massive Burn InjuryFrance
-
Clin4allRecruitingPsoriasis of Scalp | Psoriasis Nail | Psoriasis Palmaris | Psoriasis Genital | Psoriasis PlantarisFrance