The Esteem® Hearing Implant Post Approval Study

To Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in Subjects Suffering From Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Esteem® Hearing Implant in subjects suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Hearing Loss
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: The Esteem Hearing Implant

Detailed Description

The Post Approval Study is an extension of the pivotal clinical trial, which was designed as a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem® System. For this trial the subject acts as his or her own control.

This trial has been designed to meet the United States' regulatory requirements.

The subjects included in this study include the 57 subjects implanted under the original Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study and the five (5) subjects implanted under the continued access expansion approved by the FDA. Of these 62 subjects, all but one (explant) were available for continued follow-up. These subjects were re-consented for the 5 year Post Approval Study. No new subjects were enrolled and implanted in this study. The goal was to monitor a minimum of 45 subjects through their five (5) year follow-up. Ultimately, 51 subjects completed the study.

The following questions are to be answered:

• Is the Esteem effective through 5 year follow-up?
• Is the Esteem safe through 5 year follow-up?

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 51

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92658
      • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
    • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
      • Shohet Ear Associates
  • Massachusetts
    • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
      • Lahey Clinic, Inc.
  • North Carolina
    • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
      • Surgical Care Affiliates
    • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
      • The Ear Center of Greensboro

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Persons suffering from moderate to severe hearing loss that is sensorineural in origin

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subject must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for treatment in the trial:

1. Subject is at least 18 years old
2. Subject understands the nature of the procedure and has signed the Subject Informed Consent Form prior to the procedure
3. Subject is willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and understands the audiological test procedures and use of the Esteem® System.

4. Subject has moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss between 500 and 4000 Hz in the ear to be implanted with pure tone air-conduction threshold levels within the limits of a Hearing Aid (HA) as follow:

   Freq (Hz) 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 Lower Level (dB HL) 30 35 35 35 35 Upper Level (dB HL) 100 100 100 100 100

5. Subject's air-bone gap is no greater than 10 dB at 4 of the 5 following frequencies: 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz.
6. Subject has an unaided maximum word recognition score of greater than or equal to 40% with recorded delivery using a phonetically balanced word list at Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) + 40 dB or at maximum tolerable presentation level.
7. Subject is a current user of a properly functioning and appropriately fit hearing aid. This is defined as the subject has used this aid for at least four (4) hours (average) per day (in the ear to be implanted) for at least three (3) months for a new aid or one (1) month for an adjusted aid.
8. Subject's hearing aid, in the ear to be implanted, shall appropriately fit optimally.
9. Subject has normally functioning eustachian tube
10. Subject has normal tympanic membrane
11. Subject has a normal middle ear anatomy
12. Subject has adequate space for Esteem® System implant determined via fine cut temporal bone CT scan
13. Subject is a native speaker of the English language.
14. Subject is a hearing aid user in the ear to be implanted

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be excluded from the trial if any one of the following criteria is met:

1. Subject has a history of post-adolescent chronic middle ear infections, inner ear disorders or recurring vertigo requiring treatment, disorders such as mastoiditis, Hydrops or Meniere's syndrome or disease
2. Subject has a history of external otitis or eczema for the outer ear canal and the investigator believes this will affect the Esteem® System implantation
3. Subject has cholesteatoma or destructive middle ear disease
4. Subject has life expectancy of less than two (2) years due to other medical conditions
5. Subject has retrocochlear or central auditory disorders
6. Subject is known to be suffering from any psychological, developmental, physical, or emotional disorder that the investigator feels would interfere with the surgery or follow-up testing
7. Subject has a known history of fluctuating air conduction and/or bone conduction hearing loss over a one-year period of 15 dB in either direction at 2 or more frequencies (from 500 - 4000 Hz)
8. Subject has sudden hearing loss due to unknown cause
9. Subject has a history of disabling tinnitus, defined as tinnitus which required treatment.
10. Subject is unable to adequately perform audiological testing
11. Subject has a medical condition or undergoing a treatment that may affect healing and the investigator does not believe the subject is a good candidate for the trial.
12. Subject has diabetes that is not well controlled with medication or diet and the investigator does not believe in his best medical judgment that the subject would be a good candidate for the trial
13. Subject is pregnant at the time of device implant
14. Subject has a history of keloid formation
15. Subject has known hypersensitivity to silicone rubber, polyurethane, stainless steel, titanium and/or gold

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Cohort
• Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Speech Reception Threshold (SRT)	ENDPOINT #1: SRT at baseline minus SRT at Year 5. Positive difference (i.e. lower value of SRT with the Esteem) indicates better outcome.	Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
Change From Baseline (Pre-implant Aided Condition) at Year 5 in Word Recognition Score (WRS) at 50 dB HL	ENDPOINT #2: WRS at Year 5 minus WRS at baseline. Positive difference (in % correct) indicates better outcome.	Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up
Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs) and Device Failures and Replacements at Each Follow-up.	ENDPOINT #3: The analysis of the incidence of SADEs and device failures and replacements at each follow-up.	SADEs, PAS phase through Year 5 of Follow Up
Bone Conduction Stability	ENDPOINT #5: Difference between Baseline and 5 Year Pure-Tone Average (PTA; average of 500, 1000, 2000 Hz thresholds); calculated as PTA at Year 5 minus PTA at baseline. Smaller magnitude dB difference indicates better outcome.	Baseline through 5 Year Follow-Up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Improvement in Quality of Life as Reflected by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaire	APHAB results were obtained from baseline aided condition through Year 5 of follow up. The APHAB responses are in terms of percent of time an individual experiences problems, on a scale of 0-100%; lower scores indicate fewer problems.Compared scores with Esteem to scores in baseline aided condition, calculated as APHAB Global score at baseline minus APHAB Global score at Year 5, giving a "difference in benefit" score. The Global Score is the mean of the scores (% of problems) for Ease of Communication (EC), Reverberation (RV), and Background Noise (BN) subscales of the APHAB. A positive difference in benefit score indicates more benefit with Esteem.	Baseline through Year 5 of Follow Up

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Envoy Medical Corporation
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Jack A Shohet, MD, Hoag Memorial Hospital; Principal Investigator: Elizabeth H Toh, MBBS; MD, Lahey Clinic Medical Center; Principal Investigator: Eric M Kraus, MD, MS, FACS, Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Invisible Hearing with Esteem®

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: August 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2014
• Study Completion (Actual): March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 8, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 26, 2016
• First Posted (Estimate): January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): May 4, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 31, 2016
• Last Verified: January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: hearing loss; sensorineural; hearing implant
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Nervous System Diseases; Neurologic Manifestations; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases; Ear Diseases; Sensation Disorders; Hearing Disorders; Hearing Loss; Deafness
• Other Study ID Numbers: 0204 Post-Approval Study (PAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No