Investigation of the Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc

December 16, 2025 updated by: NuVasive

Clinical Study Protocol for the Investigation Of The Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc

This study is intended to demonstrate that the Simplify® Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when used to treat one level between C3 to C7 for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) defined as intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the level of the disc space in subjects who are unresponsive to conservative management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Simplify® Disc for treatment of DDD compared to conventional ACDF for reconstruction of the disc space at one level between C3 to C7 for DDD defined as intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the level of the disc space that is unresponsive to conservative management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States
      • Orange, California, United States
      • Santa Monica, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Thornton, Colorado, United States
    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • Lockport, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
    • Texas
      • Addison, Texas, United States
      • Plano, Texas, United States
      • Tyler, Texas, United States
    • Virginia
      • Reston, Virginia, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 18 and 60 years of age;
  • Have symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one cervical level from C3 to C7 defined as intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and /or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and radiographic evidence of at least one of the following;

    1. Spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes or dark disc) on CT or MRI or;
    2. Disc height decreased by ≥ 1 mm when compared to adjacent levels on radiographic film, CT, or MRI or
    3. Disc herniation on CT or MRI;
  • Have at least one of the following radiculopathy or myelopathy symptoms in neck and/or arm;

    1. Pain or paresthesias in a specific nerve root distribution from C3 to C7,
    2. Decreased muscle strength of at least one level on the 0-5 scale, or
    3. Abnormal sensation, including hyperesthesia or hypoesthesia.
  • Have at least one of the following:

    1. At least six weeks of prior conservative treatment (e.g., physical therapy and/or use of anti-inflammatory medications and muscle relaxants at the manufacturer's recommended therapeutic dose);
    2. The presence of progressive symptoms (e.g., increasing numbness or tingling) or
    3. Signs of nerve root compression.
  • Have a Neck Disability Index (NDI) greater than or equal to 40 on a scale of 100 (moderate disability);
  • Be appropriate for treatment using an anterior surgical approach;
  • Be likely to return for all follow-up visits and
  • Be willing and able to provide Informed Consent for study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Marked cervical instability on resting lateral or flexion/ extension X-ray (translation > 3 mm or > 11 degrees rotation to that of either adjacent non-treatment level);
  • Non discogenic neck pain or non discogenic source of symptoms (e.g., tumor, rotator cuff injury, etc.);
  • Radiographic confirmation of severe facet disease or facet degeneration;
  • Bridging osteophytes;
  • Less than 2 degrees of motion at index level;
  • Prior surgery at the level to be treated, except laminotomy without accompanying facetectomy;
  • Prior fusion at any cervical level;
  • More than one neck surgery via anterior approach;
  • Previous trauma to the C3-C7 levels resulting in compression or bursting;
  • Documented presence of a free nuclear fragment at cervical levels other than the study level;
  • Axial neck pain only (no radicular or myelopathy symptoms);
  • Symptomatic DDD at more than one cervical level;
  • Severe myelopathy (less than 3/5 muscle strength);
  • Any paralysis;
  • Recent history (within previous six months) of chemical or alcohol dependence;
  • Active systemic infection;
  • Infection at the site of surgery;
  • Prior disc space infection or osteomyelitis in the cervical spine;
  • Any terminal, systemic or autoimmune disease;
  • Metabolic bone disease (e.g., osteoporosis/osteopenia , gout, osteomalacia, Paget's disease);
  • Any disease, condition or surgery which might impair healing, such as;

    1. Diabetes mellitus requiring daily insulin management,
    2. Active malignancy,
    3. History of metastatic malignancy.
  • Current or extended use (> 6 months) of any drug known to interfere with bone or soft tissue healing;
  • Known PEEK, ceramic, titanium allergy;
  • Arachnoiditis;
  • Significant cervical anatomical deformity at the index level or clinically compromised cervical vertebral bodies at the index level due to current or past trauma (e.g., by radiographic appearance of fracture callus, malunion, or nonunion) or disease (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis);
  • Currently experiencing an episode of major mental illness (psychosis, major affective disorder, or schizophrenia), or manifesting physical symptoms without a diagnosable medical condition to account for the symptoms, which may indicate symptoms of psychological rather than physical origin;
  • Pregnancy at time of enrollment, or planning to become pregnant, since this would contraindicate surgery ;
  • Use of spinal stimulator at any cervical level prior to surgery;
  • Currently a prisoner;
  • Currently involved in spinal litigation which may influence the subjects reporting of symptoms or
  • Participation in any other investigational drug, biologic or medical device study within the last 30 days prior to study surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®|C Disc trial.
Other Names:
  • ACDF
Experimental: Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Composite Clinical Success (CCS) of Simplify Disc
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Individual success for the Simplify® Disc subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months of index procedure; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months.

Individual success for the control ADCF device subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in NDI Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months.

NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.

Baseline, 24 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With 15-point Improvement in NDI at 3 Months (Time to Recovery)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 Months
Time to recovery is defined as time to first 15-point improvement in NDI NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.
Baseline, 3 Months
VAS Neck and Arm Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Changes of at least 20 mm on a 100mm will be regarded as clinically significant VAS 0mm (no pain); VAS 100mm (worst pain)
Baseline, 24 Months
Neurological Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Neurological success was defined as maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at Month 24 as compared to baseline, as determined by the independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC). The CEC reviews neurological exams of motor, sensory, reflex, clumsiness, atrophy, cramping, spasms, numbness, dysphagia, dysphonia, and myelopathic gait to make an adjudication determination.
Baseline, 24 Months
SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months

The PCS is a sub-score of the SF-12. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scores that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. Scores range from 0-50.

Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.

Baseline, 24 Months
SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months

The MCS is a sub-score of the SF-12. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scores that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. Scores range from 0-50.

Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.

Baseline, 24 Months
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Time Frame: 24 Months
Question 1 - "how does the subject rate satisfaction with the treated received" was compared between groups at Month 24. Answer options ranged from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.
24 Months
Odom's Criteria Results
Time Frame: 24 Months
Results at 24 months for the investigational Simplify® Disc and at 24 months for the control ACDF will also be categorized by the physician according to Odom's Criteria.
24 Months
Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI scale) for the investigational Simplify® Disc at 24 months compared to baseline. A higher score is indicative of a less desirable outcome. It is scored 0-100.

Data was not collected on DHI in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.

Baseline, 24 Months
Average Disc Height (Index Level)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Change in average disc height (index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Baseline, 24 Months
Average Disc Height (Above the Index Level)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Change in average disc height (Above the index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Baseline, 24 Months
Average Disc Height (Below the Index Level)
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Change in average disc height (below the index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Baseline, 24 Months
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Outcome reports the number and percentage of subjects with adjacent level disc degeneration (ALDD) above the index level.
Baseline, 24 Months
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Outcome reports the number and percentage of subjects with adjacent level disc degeneration (ALDD) below the index level.
Baseline, 24 Months
Device Migration
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months
Device migration assesses significant movement of the implant postoperatively
Baseline, 24 Months
Facet Deterioration
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 Months

Facet degeneration was assessed using MRI for the investigational Simplify Disc at 24 months compared to baseline.

Facet degeneration was not assessed in the ACDF historical control group, as there is no 24 month MRI. This was pre-specified in the study design.

Baseline, 24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kyle Malone, NuVasive

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

January 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • G140154

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion

Subscribe