Project Collabri for Treatment of Anxiety

February 2, 2026 updated by: Lene Falgaard Eplov, Amager Hospital

Project Collabri. The Effects of a Danish Model of Collaborative Care for People With Anxiety in General Practice

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment of patients with anxiety according to the Collabri Model is more effective in reducing symptoms compared to treatment as usual (TAU)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Depression and anxiety are common diseases often treated in general practice. However, there are obstacles for optimal treatment e.g. a lack of continuity in disease management, organized collaboration between primary and secondary care and access to psychotherapy. Previous collaborative care studies have shown significant improvements in treatment outcomes for patients with depression and anxiety in primary care; however studies have yet not been carried out in a Danish context. Thus, the Collabri-model for collaborative care for panic disorder, generalized anxiety, social phobia and depression has been developed. The model includes: a multi-professional approach to treatment including a care manager (e.g. a psychiatric nurse), enhanced inter-professional communication, scheduled monitoring and review and structured treatment plans.

Objective:

To investigate whether treatment according to the Collabri-model have an effect on symptoms for people with anxiety disorders.

Methods/design:

Three cluster-randomized, clinical trials are set up to investigate treatment according to the Collabri-model compared to treatment as usual for 364 patients diagnosed with panic disorder, generalized anxiety and social phobia respectively from general practices in the Capital Region of Denmark. For all studies, the primary outcome is anxiety symptoms measured with Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at 6 months.

Results/discussion:

The results will contribute new knowledge on collaborative care for depression and anxiety disorders in Danish conditions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

406

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Mental Health Centre Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18+ years
  • Danish speaking
  • Diagnosis of current depression using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) (DSM IV) by researchers that have been trained in using MINI and according to the ICD-10 criteria or when diagnosed by GP after conference with a psychiatrist in Project Collabri
  • The patient has given her/his written informed consent to participate in the trial at the described terms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk of suicide assessed in the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and/or by general practitioner
  • Psychotic condition detected in the MINI and/or by general practitioner
  • Patients with a diagnosis of dementia
  • Pregnancy
  • Alcohol or substance misuse that hinders the person participating in Collabri treatment as assessed by the practitioner or researcher at inclusion interview
  • Patients that are in current psychological or psychiatric treatment due to anxiety or depression
  • Patients with a pending disability pension case
  • Patients who have been treated for anxiety or depression within the last 6 months
  • For patients in the intervention group: Patients with depression who wants treatment cf. the Danish psychologist scheme and do not want the reference to the psychologist preceded by other treatment, cf. the Collabri model
  • For patients in the intervention group: If the patient at the first point of contact with the general practitioner after inclusion by a research assistant is referred to treatment as a part of the secondary psychiatric care system.
  • Patients who are assessed by the general practitioner as medically unstable making it impossible for the patient to adhere to treatment
  • OCD, PTSD, bipolar affective disorder as assessed in the MINI and/or by the general practitioner

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment according to the Collabri model
Participants in this group will recive treatment according to the Collabri model which is a Danish model for collaborative care between primary and secondary care for depression, social phobia, generalized anxiety and panic disorder
The Collabri Model is a complex intervention and consists of a number of treatment modalities. The Collabri Model includes the following elements: A multi-professional approach to treatment including a care manager, scheduled monitoring and review, enhanced inter-professional communication and a structured treatment plan. It further integrates: Recruitment of staff with psychiatric experience, training of general practitioner and care manager, use of instruments for detection and follow-up, education and treatment of the patient, supervision from a psychiatric specialist, guided self-help, patient- and relative involvement and a stepped care approach to treatment where treatment is always commenced on the least invasive and least resource-demanding level.
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
Control group. Participants in this group will recive treatment as usual. This means that participants will recive treatment corresponding to what their GP normally would offer as treatment. E.g. this could be refferal to a psychologist or psychiatrist and/or medicine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of anxiety measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of depression measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Psychological stress measured with the Symptom Checklist (SCL-92)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Functional impairment measured with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF-F split version)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 6 months follow up after baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of anxiety measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Degree of depression measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Psychological stress measured with the Symptom Checklist (SCL-92)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Functional impairment measured with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF-F split version)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Quality of life measured with the WHO-5 scale
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Quality of life measured with the WHO-5 scale
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Personal and social performance measured with the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Personal and social performance measured with the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Side effects measured by the PRISE questionnaire
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Side effects measured by the PRISE questionnaire
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Functional impairment measured with Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Functional impairment measured with Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Sick leave
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained from the Danish DREAM database
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Sick leave
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained from the Danish DREAM database
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Obtain Help from Community, Family, Friends" from the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Obtain Help from Community, Family, Friends" from the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Control/Manage Depression Scale" from the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Control/Manage Depression Scale" from the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Personal Control" from The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Self-efficacy measured with the subscale "Personal Control" from The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is self-reported
At 15 months follow up after baseline
Apathia
Time Frame: At 6 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 6 months follow up after baseline
Apathia
Time Frame: At 15 months follow up after baseline
The measure is obtained through a semi-structured interview
At 15 months follow up after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lene F Eplov, MD PhD, Mental Health Center Copenhagen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

February 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-3-2013-203-A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Panic Disorder

Clinical Trials on Treatment according to the Collabri model

Subscribe