Effectiveness of an Adventure-based Training Programme to Reduce Fatigue for Childhood Cancer Survivors

January 11, 2017 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Effectiveness of an Adventure-based Training Programme in Promoting Regular Physical Activity, Reducing Fatigue and Enhancing Quality of Life Among Hong Kong Chinese Childhood Cancer Survivors

Background: Cancer-related fatigue is the most common concern reported by Childhood cancer survivors. Empirical evidence is needed to find out an appropriate strategy for ameliorating its impact.

Purposes: To examine the effectiveness of an adventure-based training programme in promoting regular physical activity, reducing fatigue and enhancing quality of life among Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors.

Design and Subjects: A randomised controlled trial (RCT), two-group pre-test and repeated post-test, between subjects design has been conducted. Recruitment of subjects has been carried out in an outpatient clinic, and through the Children's Cancer Foundation and Sunshine Group, which are non-profit voluntary organizations with the aim to provide education and supportive services to parents of Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors.

Intervention: Participants in the experimental group have joined a four-day adventure-based training programme, which contains education talks, a workshop and adventure-based training activities. Those in the placebo control group has received an amount of time and attention (leisure activities organized by a community centre) that mimick that received by the experimental group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an adventure-based training programme in promoting regular physical activity, reducing fatigue and enhancing quality of life among Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors.

Intervention

Experimental group

Besides receiving medical follow-up, participants have joined a four-day adventure-based training programme, which contains education talks, a workshop to work out a feasible individual action plan for regular physical activity and adventure-based training activities. Previous research showed that working out individual action plan is important, which can increase the possibility for people to turn their intentions into health promotion action. The content of the education talks is tailor-made for participants in which they do not engage in regular physical activity.

Placebo control group

Participants will receive medical follow-up according to the schedule of the oncology units. Besides, participants will receive an amount of time and attention that mimic that received by the experimental group, but which is thought not to have any specific effect on the outcome measures. They will be invited to attend leisure activities organized by a community centre in four different days during the study period. Activities include cartoon film shows, handicraft workshops, chess games, health talks on the prevention of influenza and healthy diet, day visit to museums and theme parks and galleries.

To ensure the dosage of intervention delivered in terms of the amount, frequency, duration, and breadth would be adequate to assess the quality and to manage outcomes, such as physical activity levels, self-efficacy, stages of change and quality of life, the following measures has been taken. An advisory committee has been set up with the purpose to develop an appropriate programme for Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors. The committee includes an associate professor, a lecturer and a research student at a local university with considerable experience of conducting psychological interventions among children, a paediatric oncologist and a oncology nurse specialist with rich experience in taking care of children with cancer and one assistant professor of Sports and Recreation Management with extensive experience and professional knowledge in conducting adventure-based training for children. In addition, the content of the programme that related to adventure-based training activities has been sent to a professional adventure-based training centre for content validation. The programme has been implemented on four different days within six months in a day camp training centre, such as at 2-week, 2-month, 4-month and 6-month after the day of recruitment. The programme has been implemented in small group with maximum 12 participants in one group. Health education talks and workshop have been implemented in between adventure-based training activities in day camp centre, conducted by healthcare professionals working in a local university. Adventure-based training activities have been led by two qualified adventure-based training instructors with extensive experience and professional knowledge in conducting such training for children. Additionally, at least two healthcare professionals join the adventure-based training to monitor the physical condition of the survivors and their fitness to join the adventure-based training activities.

Data Collection Methods

Approval for the study was obtained from the hospital ethics committees. To identify potential subjects, a leaflet containing details of the study and a demographic sheet have been mailed to all parents of childhood cancer survivors in the Sunshine Group and Children's Cancer Foundation. If children and their parents are interested in the research, they can return the demographic sheet by using the enclosed return-envelop to convey their willingness to participate in the study. A briefing session will then be conducted in the out-patient clinic to those eligible children and parents. Written consent has been obtained from the parents after they were told the purposes of the study, although they were of course given the option of allowing or refusing the involvement of their child. The children has also been invited to put their names on a special children's assent form and told that their participation is voluntary.

After obtaining demographic data of participants, they have been asked to respond to the Chinese version of the FS-C/FS-A, PA-SE, CUHK-PARCY, PASCQ and PedsQL. They have also been assessed for muscle strength using a hand-held dynamometer. Participants have been randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. All participants received a telephone call inviting them to join the interventions according to their group assignment at an appointed time. Data collection has been conducted again at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after starting the intervention. All participants has been informed that there would be home visits for data collection.

Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 21.0 for Windows will be used to analyze quantitative data. Intention-to-treat analysis will be used and missing data will be substituted by the last-observation-carried-forward procedure. The comparability of the experimental and control groups will be assessed by using inferential statistics (independent t-test and chi-squared test). Descriptive statistics will be used to calculate the mean scores and standard deviation of different scales. Mixed between-within subjects ANOVA (split-plot ANOVA) will be used to determine whether the adventure-based training programme was effective in reducing fatigue, increasing childhood cancer survivors' levels of physical activity, self-efficacy and muscle strength and enhancing their quality of life. In addition, Friedman Test will be used to determine any changes in stages of change between the experimental and control groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

222

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong SAR, China
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 16 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The Inclusion Criteria for eligible Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivals are as follows:

  • Aged 9 to 16 years;
  • Able to speak Cantonese and read Chinese;
  • Had completed cancer treatment at least six months previously; and
  • Did not engage in regular physical activity for the past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators will exclude childhood cancer survivors with evidence of recurrence or second malignancies, and those with physical impairment or cognitive and learning problems identified from their medical records.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: health talk and adventure-based training
Participate will join a four-day adventure-based training programme, which contains education talks, workshop and adventure-based training activities. The programme will be implemented on four different days within six months in a day camp training centre. The integrated programme will be implemented in small group with maximum 12 participants in one group. Health education talks and workshop will be implemented in between adventure-based training activities in day camp centre, which will be conducted by healthcare professionals working in a local university.
To develop an integrated programme for Hong Kong Chinese childhood cancer survivors, an advisory committee was set up which included an associate professor, an assistant professor and a research student at a local university, a pediatric oncologist and oncology nurse and one assistant professor of Sports and Recreation Management, ensuring the adequate 'dosage' of the intervention and the feasibility of implementing such programme for Hong Kong childhood cancer survivors.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo Control
Participants will receive an amount of time and attention that mimicked that received by the experimental group, but which is thought not to have any specific effect on the outcome measures. They will be invited to attend leisure activities organized by a community centre in four different days during the study period. Activities will include cartoon film shows, handicraft workshops, chess games, health talks on the prevention of influenza and healthy diet, day visit to museum and theme park.
They will be invited to attend leisure activities organized by a community centre in four different days during the study period. Activities will include cartoon film shows, handicraft workshops, chess games, health talks on the prevention of influenza and healthy diet, day visit to museums and theme parks and galleries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in levels of cancer-related fatigue from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The primary outcomes are levels of cancer-related fatigue at 6 months after starting the intervention among the two groups. The Fatigue Scale - Child will be used to assess the fatigue of subjects who are 7 to 12 years old. For those aged 13 to 18, their fatigue levels will be measured by the Fatigue Scale - Adolescent.
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in levels of cancer-related fatigue from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
The Fatigue Scale - Child will be used to assess the fatigue of subjects who are 7 to 12 years old. For those aged 13 to 18, their fatigue levels will be measured by the Fatigue Scale - Adolescent.
3-month follow-up
change in levels of cancer-related fatigue from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow-up
The Fatigue Scale - Child will be used to assess the fatigue of subjects who are 7 to 12 years old. For those aged 13 to 18, their fatigue levels will be measured by the Fatigue Scale - Adolescent.
9-month follow-up
change in levels of cancer-related fatigue from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-months follow-up
The Fatigue Scale - Child will be used to assess the fatigue of subjects who are 7 to 12 years old. For those aged 13 to 18, their fatigue levels will be measured by the Fatigue Scale - Adolescent.
12-months follow-up
levels of cancer-related fatigue at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The Fatigue Scale - Child will be used to assess the fatigue of subjects who are 7 to 12 years old. For those aged 13 to 18, their fatigue levels will be measured by the Fatigue Scale - Adolescent.
Baseline
change in physical activity levels from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The physical activity levels of participants will be assessed using the CUHK-PARCY, which is an 11-item activity rating modified from the Jackson Activity Coding and the Godin-Shephard Activity Questionnaire Modified for Adolescents. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the CUHK-PARCY at 6 months after starting the intervention.
6-month follow-up
change in physical activity levels from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow-up
The physical activity levels of participants will be assessed using the CUHK-PARCY, which is an 11-item activity rating modified from the Jackson Activity Coding and the Godin-Shephard Activity Questionnaire Modified for Adolescents. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the CUHK-PARCY at 3 months after starting the intervention.
3-month follow-up
change in physical activity levels from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow-up
The physical activity levels of participants will be assessed using the CUHK-PARCY, which is an 11-item activity rating modified from the Jackson Activity Coding and the Godin-Shephard Activity Questionnaire Modified for Adolescents. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the CUHK-PARCY at 9 months after starting the intervention.
9-month follow-up
change in physical activity levels from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
The physical activity levels of participants will be assessed using the CUHK-PARCY, which is an 11-item activity rating modified from the Jackson Activity Coding and the Godin-Shephard Activity Questionnaire Modified for Adolescents. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the CUHK-PARCY at 12 months after starting the intervention.
12-month follow-up
Physical activity levels activity at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The physical activity levels of participants will be assessed using the CUHK-PARCY, which is an 11-item activity rating modified from the Jackson Activity Coding and the Godin-Shephard Activity Questionnaire Modified for Adolescents. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the CUHK-PARCY before randomization.
Baseline
Stages of Change at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The current stages of exercising patterns for participants will be evaluated by an adapted version of PASCQ. It is a binary type (yes/no) questionnaire, and contains four items. Participants will answer each question about their physical activity practices with a 'yes' or a 'no'. According to these responses, they will be classified into five different stages by means of a scoring algorithm. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PASCQ before the randomization.
Baseline
change in stages of change from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
The current stages of exercising patterns for participants will be evaluated by an adapted version of PASCQ. It is a binary type (yes/no) questionnaire, and contains four items. Participants will answer each question about their physical activity practices with a 'yes' or a 'no'. According to these responses, they will be classified into five different stages by means of a scoring algorithm. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PASCQ 3 months after starting the intervention.
3-month follow up
change in stages of change from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow up
The current stages of exercising patterns for participants will be evaluated by an adapted version of PASCQ. It is a binary type (yes/no) questionnaire, and contains four items. Participants will answer each question about their physical activity practices with a 'yes' or a 'no'. According to these responses, they will be classified into five different stages by means of a scoring algorithm. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PASCQ 6 months after starting the intervention.
6-month follow up
change in stages of change from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow up
The current stages of exercising patterns for participants will be evaluated by an adapted version of PASCQ. It is a binary type (yes/no) questionnaire, and contains four items. Participants will answer each question about their physical activity practices with a 'yes' or a 'no'. According to these responses, they will be classified into five different stages by means of a scoring algorithm. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PASCQ 9 months after starting the intervention.
9-month follow up
change in stages of change from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-month follow up
The current stages of exercising patterns for participants will be evaluated by an adapted version of PASCQ. It is a binary type (yes/no) questionnaire, and contains four items. Participants will answer each question about their physical activity practices with a 'yes' or a 'no'. According to these responses, they will be classified into five different stages by means of a scoring algorithm. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PASCQ 12 months after starting the intervention.
12-month follow up
physical activity self-efficacy at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The PA-SE will be used to measure the children's self-confidence in their ability to participate in various age-appropriate physical activities. The PA-SE includes five items in which children are asked if they are 'not sure', 'a little sure' or 'very sure' that they can do such things such as 'keep up a steady pace without stopping for 15-20 min'. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PA-SE before the randomization.
baseline
change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
The PA-SE will be used to measure the children's self-confidence in their ability to participate in various age-appropriate physical activities. The PA-SE includes five items in which children are asked if they are 'not sure', 'a little sure' or 'very sure' that they can do such things such as 'keep up a steady pace without stopping for 15-20 min'. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PA-SE 3 months after starting the intervention.
3-month follow up
change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow up
The PA-SE will be used to measure the children's self-confidence in their ability to participate in various age-appropriate physical activities. The PA-SE includes five items in which children are asked if they are 'not sure', 'a little sure' or 'very sure' that they can do such things such as 'keep up a steady pace without stopping for 15-20 min'. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PA-SE 6 months after starting the intervention.
6-month follow up
change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow up
The PA-SE will be used to measure the children's self-confidence in their ability to participate in various age-appropriate physical activities. The PA-SE includes five items in which children are asked if they are 'not sure', 'a little sure' or 'very sure' that they can do such things such as 'keep up a steady pace without stopping for 15-20 min'. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PA-SE 9 months after starting the intervention.
9-month follow up
change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-month follow up
The PA-SE will be used to measure the children's self-confidence in their ability to participate in various age-appropriate physical activities. The PA-SE includes five items in which children are asked if they are 'not sure', 'a little sure' or 'very sure' that they can do such things such as 'keep up a steady pace without stopping for 15-20 min'. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PA-SE 12 months after starting the intervention.
12-month follow up
quality of life at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The PedsQL will be used to measure quality of life among childhood cancer survivors. The instrument comprises 23 items grouped into four subscales: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items) and school functioning (5 items). Participants will be asked how much of a problem has been experienced over the last month, with rating from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PedsQL before the randomization.
baseline
change in quality of life from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
The PedsQL will be used to measure quality of life among childhood cancer survivors. The instrument comprises 23 items grouped into four subscales: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items) and school functioning (5 items). Participants will be asked how much of a problem has been experienced over the last month, with rating from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PedsQL 3 months after starting the intervention.
3-month follow up
change in quality of life from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow up
The PedsQL will be used to measure quality of life among childhood cancer survivors. The instrument comprises 23 items grouped into four subscales: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items) and school functioning (5 items). Participants will be asked how much of a problem has been experienced over the last month, with rating from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PedsQL 6 months after starting the intervention.
6-month follow up
change in quality of life from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow up
The PedsQL will be used to measure quality of life among childhood cancer survivors. The instrument comprises 23 items grouped into four subscales: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items) and school functioning (5 items). Participants will be asked how much of a problem has been experienced over the last month, with rating from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PedsQL 9 months after starting the intervention.
9-month follow up
change in quality of life from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-month follow up
The PedsQL will be used to measure quality of life among childhood cancer survivors. The instrument comprises 23 items grouped into four subscales: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items) and school functioning (5 items). Participants will be asked how much of a problem has been experienced over the last month, with rating from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Participant will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the PedsQL 12 months after starting the intervention.
12-month follow up
muscle strength at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The isokinetic strength of muscles will be measured by a dynamometer using a break and make technique before randomization.
baseline
change in muscle strength from baseline at 3-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
The isokinetic strength of muscles will be measured by a dynamometer using a break and make technique 3 months after starting the intervention.
3-month follow up
change in muscle strength from baseline at 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow up
The isokinetic strength of muscles will be measured by a dynamometer using a break and make technique 6 months after starting the intervention.
6-month follow up
change in muscle strength from baseline at 9-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 9-month follow up
The isokinetic strength of muscles will be measured by a dynamometer using a break and make technique 9 months after starting the intervention.
9-month follow up
change in muscle strength from baseline at 12-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 12-month follow up
The isokinetic strength of muscles will be measured by a dynamometer using a break and make technique 12 months after starting the intervention.
12-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PhD_1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Childhood Cancer

Clinical Trials on health talk and adventure-based training

3
Subscribe