Promoting Mental Well-being for Secondary School Students Through an Experiential Learning Activity

March 30, 2020 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Mental health problems in adolescents are a global problem and are becoming more prevalent in Hong Kong. Indeed, the rising incidence of emotional disturbances, adjustment and eating problems, depression, and suicidal tendencies have become major public health concerns.

Over the past few decades, Hong Kong has experienced a significant change in family structure, with an increase in small nuclear. Therefore, children may be overprotected by parents and become more fragile and less resilient to psychological distress, in the meantime, parents' high expectations for children's academic increase the pressure on the teenagers.

As resilience can promote better mental well-being with reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms, It is crucial for healthcare professionals to collaborate with youth centers in the community to build effective health promotion programs in schools that can enhance the resilience of adolescents and foster the development of their coping mechanisms and positive mental well-being so that adolescents can better combat mental health problems and lead healthier lives.

Adventure-based training rests on a theory of experiential learning, which involves a four-step model of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, and active experimentation. In adventure-based training, participants are required to join the activities which are psychologically and physically demanding. They may experience frustration and anxiety in the earlier stages, but this is potentially therapeutic as it can facilitate the process of concrete experience by encouraging them to accept an innovative approach in dealing with challenges. During the adventure process, the emphasis is placed on changing the dysfunctional and negative actions of team members into functional and positive actions, and on the interaction between team members in accomplishing different challenging tasks. Participants experience difficulties and look for possibilities, and with the proper guidance, facilitation and intervention of instructors the objectives of the training are achieved. Successful experience of this kind can facilitate the personal development and enhance the resilience and self-esteem of participants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Mental health problems in adolescents are a global problem and are becoming more prevalent in Hong Kong. Indeed, the rising incidence of emotional disturbances, adjustment and eating problems, depression, and suicidal tendencies have become major public health concerns.

Over the past few decades, Hong Kong has experienced a significant change in family structure, with small nuclear families gradually replacing extended families. Therefore, children receive more attention and may be overprotected by parents as a result of having fewer, if any, siblings. It is possible that this explains why children are more fragile, more vulnerable, and less resilient to psychological distress than were previous generations. Moreover, parents' high expectations for high academic achievement may also contribute to increased mental health problems among adolescents in Hong Kong. Most parents in Hong Kong believe that better careers and brighter futures are the inevitable results of higher academic achievement. Given this context, Hong Kong Chinese adolescents are exposed to considerable pressure within their families and schools while growing up.

Evidence suggests that depressive symptoms predict suicidal tendencies among children and adolescents. Although suicide rates in Hong Kong have dropped significantly from 18.8 per 100,000 in 2003 to 11.7 per 100,000 in 2016, a trend to increases in youth suicides in the past few years remains a concern. On the other hand, there is some evidence that resilience effectively prevents the development of mental health problems and is associated with positive mental health outcomes in adolescents, such as reduced levels of anxiety and depression [6]. It is therefore crucial for healthcare professionals to collaborate with youth centers in the community to build effective health promotion programs in schools that can enhance the resilience of adolescents and foster the development of their coping mechanisms and positive mental well-being so that adolescents can better combat mental health problems and lead healthier lives.

We conducted a 'proof-of-principle' randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of experiential learning activity (adventure-based training programme) in promoting the psychological well-being of primary schoolchildren. This study provides some evidence that the adventure-based training programme is effective in enhancing self-esteem and reducing depressive symptoms among schoolchildren. Moreover, the study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing an adventure-based training programme in the Hong Kong Chinese context, with their content and nature shown to be acceptable to children and their parents.

Adventure-based training rests on a theory of experiential learning, which involves a four-step model of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualisation, and active experimentation. It aims at changing cognitive thinking and behaviour, on different levels, through experience and practice in an outdoor environment. At the adventure-based training camp, participants would have a 'concrete experience' by having some physical activities. Trainers would observe and note down the important moments for further discussion and could recap the experiences that participants had had in the activity (reflective observation). While recapping the experience, trainers could assist the participants to sum up their experience and help them to discuss what they could do to make the experience better (abstract conceptualisation). With consolidation, the trainer would then encourage participants to think of similar situations that they might face in their daily lives and how they could apply the lessons learnt in this experience into others (active experimentation).

In adventure-based training, participants are required to join in different activities which are psychologically and physically demanding. They may experience frustration and anxiety in the earlier stages, but this is potentially therapeutic as it can facilitate the process of concrete experience by encouraging them to accept an innovative approach in dealing with challenges. During the adventure process, the emphasis is placed on changing the dysfunctional and negative actions of team members into functional and positive actions, and on the interaction between team members in accomplishing different challenging tasks. Participants experience difficulties and look for possibilities, and with the proper guidance, facilitation and intervention of instructors the objectives of the training are achieved. Successful experience of this kind can facilitate the personal development and enhance the resilience and self-esteem of participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

254

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • secondary school students from Form 1 to 3,
  • able to speak Cantonese and read Chinese.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children with cognitive and learning problems identified from their school records.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Participants need to attend an adventure-based training with various experiential learning activities with a health educational talk on mental health.
Participants need to attend an adventure-based training with various experiential learning activities with a health educational talk on mental health.
No Intervention: Control group
Participants would have their usual activity without any intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in resilience levels from baseline to 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The Resilience Scale-14 (RS-14) is a 14-item scale measuring personal competence, and acceptance of self and life. The item is answered using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree," with total possible scores ranging from 14 to 98. Higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.
6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resilience level at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The Resilience Scale-14 (RS-14) is a 14-item scale measuring personal competence, and acceptance of self and life. The item is answered using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree," with total possible scores ranging from 14 to 98. Higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.
baseline
Change in resilience levels from baseline to 1-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
The Resilience Scale-14 (RS-14) is a 14-item scale measuring personal competence, and acceptance of self and life. The item is answered using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree," with total possible scores ranging from 14 to 98. Higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.
1-month follow-up
Depressive symptoms at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) comprises 20 standardized items to evaluate depressive symptoms. All items are evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale in relation to their incidence during the previous week, and are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = a lot); total possible scores thus range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater number of symptoms.
baseline
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to 1-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) comprises 20 standardized items to evaluate depressive symptoms. All items are evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale in relation to their incidence during the previous week, and are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = a lot); total possible scores thus range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater number of symptoms.
1-month follow-up
Self-esteem levels at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) was designed to measure self-esteem as a global disposition and has been widely used with children [9]. The RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with total possible scores ranging from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem.
baseline
Change in self-esteem levels from baseline to 1-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 1-month follow-up
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) was designed to measure self-esteem as a global disposition and has been widely used with children [9]. The RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with total possible scores ranging from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem.
1-month follow-up
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) comprises 20 standardized items to evaluate depressive symptoms. All items are evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale in relation to their incidence during the previous week, and are scored from 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = some, 3 = a lot); total possible scores thus range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater number of symptoms.
6-month follow-up
Change in self-esteem levels from baseline to 6-month follow-up between intervention and control group
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) was designed to measure self-esteem as a global disposition and has been widely used with children [9]. The RSES consists of 10 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with total possible scores ranging from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem.
6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW18456

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on Adventure-based training with health educational talk

3
Subscribe