- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05486052
Rehabilitation With Biofeedback in Neurology
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Biofeedback Rehabilitation in Patients With Neurological Diseases
The research will aim to evaluate biofeedback rehabilitation and optical oximetry assessment in neurological patients and the influence of blood parameters on the effect of the rehabilitation carried out.
An additional aim will be to evaluate components of body weight, lifestyle, dietary habits, assessment of mental state, quality of life among the study subjects.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Other: Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices among healthy subjects
- Other: Biofeedback method and Health-resort based rehabilitation Health-resort based treatments supplemented with biofeedback training
- Other: Health-resort based rehabilitation Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training.
Detailed Description
Prior to the study, an assessment of the reliability, reproducibility and validity of the devices among healthy individuals will be carried out.
The subjects will be allocated, by random selection, to two groups:
- a study group (60 subjects) - following a conventional rehabilitation programme supplemented additionally with biofeedback training
Study subjects:
- Post-stroke condition;
- Craniocerebral trauma;
- Multiple Sclerosis;
- Cerebral Palsy;
- Parkinson's disease
- Complete or partial spinal cord injury The group of subjects are patients staying at the Health Resort and Rehabilitation Hospital in Iwonicz Zdrój. The subjects will have a comprehensive rehabilitation with additional exercises/therapies using modern equipment (Biometrics, Luna EMG, HEG, Vectis, Rotor) with the biofeedback method (the study group). Control group - standard sanatorium rehabilitation programme without biofeedback exercises. Patients will have an ongoing rehabilitation period in hospital (3 weeks). The first examination will be carried out on the day of admission to hospital, the second examination on the day of discharge and, 3 months after leaving hospital, the third examination (follow-up) during the follow-up visit.
In addition, subjects will have blood tests taken, such as blood count, GL, TG, TC, HDL, LDL, CRP, serum glucose, cytokines, myokines, markers found in neurological diseases, and optical oximetry (nIRS device) will be measured.
Measurements will be taken three times for all subjects:
- assessment of hand muscle strength
- ranges of motion of hand joints
- analysis of body composition using the Tanita 780 MA analyser (body fat, lean tissue, muscle tissue, body water content
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- examination of deep sensation (mirror test)
- evaluation of the effects of rehabilitation
- functional capacity - Barthel index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tension (spasticity)
- Manual dexterity of the hand using the Box and Blocks test
- grip function of the hand according to Franchay scale
Motor abilities of the hand according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
- EDSS scale
- WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scale
- Berg scale
- GMFCS scale
- MACS scale
- PEDI scale
- GMFM scale
- Assessment of health related behaviours, eating habits, lifestyle, quality of life - standardised questionnaires. In addition, participants in the study will complete a survey questionnaire containing information on, among other things, education, marital status, place of residence.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rzeszów, Poland, 35-205
- University of Rzeszów
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 21-75 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
- spastic tension of the upper limb, paresis hand not more than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale - current health condition confirmed by a medical examination, allowing participation in tests and exercises
Test persons:
- after a stroke;
- Craniocerebral trauma;
- Multiple sclerosis;
- Cerebral Palsy;
- Parkinson's disease
- Total or partial spinal cord injury
Exclusion Criteria:
lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
- concomitant neurological, rheumatological and orthopedic diseases, including permanent contractures that may affect the grasping ability and locomotion
- unstable medical condition
- metal implants, electronic implants, menstruation in women, epilepsy,
- failure to complete a 3-week rehabilitation stay
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices among healthy subjects
Evaluation of the reliability, repeatability and credibility of biofeedback-based devices such as Biometrics, Luna EMG, Vectis, Rotor and nIRS among healthy individuals
|
Evaluation of reliability, reproducibility and validity of devices among healthy subjects Prior to the study among individuals with neurological disorders, an evaluation of the reliability, repeatability and credibility of the devices to be included in the biofeedback rehabilitation and optical oximetry measurements will be carried out. The evaluation of the devices will be carried out by two independent researchers twice |
Other: Biofeedback method and Health-resort based rehabilitation
Health-resort based treatments supplemented with biofeedback training
|
The rehabilitation programme will run for 3 weeks from Monday to Friday. Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massages, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy. Health-resort based rehabilitation The rehabilitation programme will last 3 weeks from Monday to Friday. Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, peat wraps, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy.
Health-resort based rehabilitation The rehabilitation programme will last 3 weeks from Monday to Friday.
Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy
|
Other: Health-resort based rehabilitation
Control group - health-resort based treatments, without biofeedback training.
|
Health-resort based rehabilitation The rehabilitation programme will last 3 weeks from Monday to Friday.
Patients will receive: group and individual exercises (active and assisted exercises, manipulative exercises, PNF-based exercises, balance and breathing exercises), manual massage, physical treatments such as laser, whirlpool, mud packs, carbonic acid therapy , TENS therapy, BIO-V lamp, local cryotherapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
assessment of prioprioception (deep sensation)
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
Measurement performed on the Luna EMG device, selected range of motion with eyes closed 60 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
assessment of prioprioception (deep sensation)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
Measurement performed on the Luna EMG device, selected range of motion with eyes closed 60 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
assessment of prioprioception (deep sensation)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Measurement performed on the Luna EMG device, selected range of motion with eyes closed 60 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
assessment of muscle tone (spasticity)
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
measurement performed on the Luna EMG machine, range of motion from 0 to 90 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
assessment of muscle tone (spasticity)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
measurement performed on the Luna EMG machine, range of motion from 0 to 90 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
assessment of muscle tone (spasticity)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
measurement performed on the Luna EMG machine, range of motion from 0 to 90 degrees elbow joint flexion
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
ranges of movements in the shoulder joint
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
measurements performed on the Vectis , shoulder joint range of motion: flexion to 170, extension to 170
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
ranges of movements in the shoulder joint
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
measurements performed on the Vectis , shoulder joint range of motion: flexion to 170, extension to 170
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
ranges of movements in the shoulder joint
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
measurements performed on the Vectis , shoulder joint range of motion: flexion to 170, extension to 170
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program;
|
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
pinching strength of the fingers
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter.
The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
pinching strength of the fingers
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter.
The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg,
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
pinching strength of the fingers
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter.
The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg.
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
optical oximetry
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
measurement performed with nIRS device, ranges: near infrared light (700-1300 nm) for oxyhaemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb)
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
optical oximetry
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
measurement performed with nIRS device, ranges: near infrared light (700-1300 nm) for oxyhaemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb)
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
optical oximetry
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
measurement performed with nIRS device, ranges: near infrared light (700-1300 nm) for oxyhaemoglobin (O2Hb) and deoxyhaemoglobin (HHb)
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Change Body composition assessment (fat mass, visceral fat level , muscle tissue, fat free mass , water content in the body) subjected to bioelectrical impedancy analysis - Tanita 780.
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of body composition (bioelectrical impedancy analysis - Tanita 780) Change from Baseline body composition at 3 weeks between baseline, after the end of protocol treatment
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Change Body composition assessment (fat mass, visceral fat level , muscle tissue, fat free mass , water content in the body) subjected to bioelectrical impedancy analysis - Tanita 780.
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of body composition (bioelectrical impedancy analysis - Tanita 780)
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Ranges of motion in the joints of the upper limb
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
with the use of R 500 goniometer; the device operates with an accuracy up to one degree.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the joints in the upper limb
Time Frame: research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the upper limb joints - Biometrics and Luna device
|
research among healthy people, during studies from the 3rd to the 5th year of studies
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the joints in the upper limb
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the upper limb joints - Biometrics and Luna device
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the joints in the upper limb
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
EMG of the extensors and flexors of the upper limb joints - Biometrics and Luna device
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points. A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone. 0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy" |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points. A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone. 0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy" |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Balance was assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Balance was assessed using Berg balance scale (BBS) Berg Balance Scale Description: 14-item scale designed to measure balance (1. Sitting to standing 2. Standing unsupported 3. Sitting unsupported 4. Standing to sitting 5. Transfers 6. Standing with eyes closed 7. Standing with feet together 8. Reaching forward with outstretched arm 9. Retrieving object from floor 10. Turning to look behind 11. Turning 360 degrees 12. Placing alternate foot on stool 13. Standing with one foot in front 14. Standing on one foot) Scoring: A five-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Score the LOWEST performance. Total Score = 56 Interpretation: 41-56 = independent 21-40 = walking with assistance 0 -20 = wheelchair bound |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Balance was assessed using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Balance was assessed using Berg balance scale (BBS) Berg Balance Scale Description: 14-item scale designed to measure balance (1. Sitting to standing 2. Standing unsupported 3. Sitting unsupported 4. Standing to sitting 5. Transfers 6. Standing with eyes closed 7. Standing with feet together 8. Reaching forward with outstretched arm 9. Retrieving object from floor 10. Turning to look behind 11. Turning 360 degrees 12. Placing alternate foot on stool 13. Standing with one foot in front 14. Standing on one foot) Scoring: A five-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Score the LOWEST performance. Total Score = 56 Interpretation: 41-56 = independent 21-40 = walking with assistance 0 -20 = wheelchair bound |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale.
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Increased muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale. This is a six-point scale modified to include grade 1. 0: No increase in muscle tone
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale.
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Increased muscle tone (spasticity) was examined with modified Ashworth scale. This is a six-point scale modified to include grade 1. 0: No increase in muscle tone
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of paretic limb function was assessed using the Brunnström scale.
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Motor performance (function) of extremities was assessed using Brunnström scale.
This is a six-point scale designed to assess performance (function) of paretic extremities
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of paretic limb function was assessed using the Brunnström scale.
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Motor performance (function) of extremities was assessed using Brunnström scale.
This is a six-point scale designed to assess performance (function) of paretic extremities
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of disability level, using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of disability using the modified Rankin scale (MRS) Score Description 0 - No symptoms at all 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 - Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3 - Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4 - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5 - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6 - Dead TOTAL (0-6): _______ |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of disability level, using the modified Rankin scale (MRS)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of disability using the modified Rankin scale (MRS) Score Description 0 - No symptoms at all 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities 2 - Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance 3 - Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance 4 - Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance 5 - Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention 6 - Dead TOTAL (0-6): _______ |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks.
The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks.
The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Handgrip function, according Franchay scale
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform.
The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks.
Higher score corresponds to better manual skills.
The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Handgrip function, according Franchay scale
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform.
The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks.
Higher score corresponds to better manual skills.
The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity is a comprehensive tool enabling measurement of motor function; it comprises 33 motor tasks, designed to assess general movements, precision movements, grip, coordination and speed. It is also possible to perform H subgroup tests - assessing superficial and deep sensibility, and J subgroup tests - for range of passive motion and pain induced by such movements. Individual tasks are assessed on a scale 0-2 0 - impossible task
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity is a comprehensive tool enabling measurement of motor function; it comprises 33 motor tasks, designed to assess general movements, precision movements, grip, coordination and speed. It is also possible to perform H subgroup tests - assessing superficial and deep sensibility, and J subgroup tests - for range of passive motion and pain induced by such movements. Individual tasks are assessed on a scale 0-2 0 - impossible task
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
the GMFCS is a 5-step assessment system for functioning and mobility in daily life.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
the GMFCS is a 5-step assessment system for functioning and mobility in daily life.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) describes how children with cerebral palsy use their hands when handling objects in everyday life.
The MACS includes five levels.
The assignment of a specific level to a child is based on the child's initiated activity during which they use objects, and whether the child needs the help of another person or the adaptation of equipment to be able to use them in everyday activities.
The MACS booklet also describes the differences between adjacent levels to make it easier to determine which level best describes the child's ability to use objects.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) describes how children with cerebral palsy use their hands when handling objects in everyday life.
The MACS includes five levels.
The assignment of a specific level to a child is based on the child's initiated activity during which they use objects, and whether the child needs the help of another person or the adaptation of equipment to be able to use them in everyday activities.
The MACS booklet also describes the differences between adjacent levels to make it easier to determine which level best describes the child's ability to use objects.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: HDL
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. HDL level: Men: Less than 35 mg / dL (0.9 mmol / L) high risk of heart disease. Women: Lower than 45 mg / dL (1.2 mmol / L) high risk of heart disease. 60 mg / dL (1.56 mmol / L) and above. High HDL cholesterol. |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: HDL
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. HDL level: Men: Less than 35 mg / dL (0.9 mmol / L) high risk of heart disease. Women: Lower than 45 mg / dL (1.2 mmol / L) high risk of heart disease. 60 mg / dL (1.56 mmol / L) and above. High HDL cholesterol. |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: LDL
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. LDL level: Less than 100 mg / dL (2.6 mmol / L) Norm 100 - 129 mg / dL (2.63.34 mmol / L) Above the norm 130 - 159 mg / dL (3.36 - 4.13 mmol / L) Limit 160 - 189 mg / dL (4.14 - 4.90 mmol / L) High 190 mg / dL (4.91 mmol / L) and above Very high |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: LDL
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. LDL level: Less than 100 mg / dL (2.6 mmol / L) Norm 100 - 129 mg / dL (2.63.34 mmol / L) Above the norm 130 - 159 mg / dL (3.36 - 4.13 mmol / L) Limit 160 - 189 mg / dL (4.14 - 4.90 mmol / L) High 190 mg / dL (4.91 mmol / L) and above Very high |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: total cholesterol
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. Total Cholesterol level: Less than 200 mg / dL (5.17 mmol / L) Norm 200 - 239 mg / dL (5.17 - 6.18 mmol / L) Elevated level 240 mg / dL (6.21 mmol / L) High risk of heart disease |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: total cholesterol
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. Total Cholesterol level: Less than 200 mg / dL (5.17 mmol / L) Norm 200 - 239 mg / dL (5.17 - 6.18 mmol / L) Elevated level 240 mg / dL (6.21 mmol / L) High risk of heart disease |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of WHR
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
The type of obesity is assessed with the so-called waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), which shows the proportion of waist circumference and hip circumference.
WHR specifies the location of excessive fat and makes it possible to identify two main types of obesity: visceral obesity (characteristic for men), connected with accumulation of fat in the abdominal cavity and upper part of the body, and gynoid obesity (gluteal-femoral), more common in women.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of WHR
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The type of obesity is assessed with the so-called waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), which shows the proportion of waist circumference and hip circumference.
WHR specifies the location of excessive fat and makes it possible to identify two main types of obesity: visceral obesity (characteristic for men), connected with accumulation of fat in the abdominal cavity and upper part of the body, and gynoid obesity (gluteal-femoral), more common in women.
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of metabolic syndrome
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Metabolic syndrome (polymetabolic syndrome, syndrome X, insulin resistance syndrome, Reaven syndrome) - a set of interrelated factors significantly increasing the risk of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes, as well as their vascular complications. Abdominal (central) obesity At least three of the following five abnormalities must be identified to formulate a diagnosis: abdominal obesity (waist circumference in men from Europe ≥ 94 cm, and in women ≥ 80 cm) and additionally co-existing two of the following abnormalities: triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl or dyslipidaemia related treatment cholesterol HDL < 40 mg/dl in males < 50 mg/dl in females or dyslipidaemia related treatment arterial pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg or arterial pressure related treatment fasting glycaemia ≥ 100 mg/dl or type 2 diabetes treatment |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Assessment of metabolic syndrome
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Metabolic syndrome (polymetabolic syndrome, syndrome X, insulin resistance syndrome, Reaven syndrome) - a set of interrelated factors significantly increasing the risk of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes, as well as their vascular complications. Abdominal (central) obesity At least three of the following five abnormalities must be identified to formulate a diagnosis: abdominal obesity (waist circumference in men from Europe ≥ 94 cm, and in women ≥ 80 cm) and additionally co-existing two of the following abnormalities: triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl or dyslipidaemia related treatment cholesterol HDL < 40 mg/dl in males < 50 mg/dl in females or dyslipidaemia related treatment arterial pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg or arterial pressure related treatment fasting glycaemia ≥ 100 mg/dl or type 2 diabetes treatment |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: TG
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. TG level: Below 150mg / dL (1.69mmol / L) Norm 150 - 199 mg / dL (1.69 - 2.25 mmol / L) Limit 200 - 499 mg / dL (2.26 - 5.63 mmol / L) High Above 500 mg / dL (5.64 mmol / L) Very high |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: TG
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. TG level: Below 150mg / dL (1.69mmol / L) Norm 150 - 199 mg / dL (1.69 - 2.25 mmol / L) Limit 200 - 499 mg / dL (2.26 - 5.63 mmol / L) High Above 500 mg / dL (5.64 mmol / L) Very high |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: atherogenic index
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. atherogenic index level
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: atherogenic index
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. atherogenic index level
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: CRP
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. CRP level:
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: CRP
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. CRP level:
|
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Changes in blood parameter: serum glucose
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. serum glucose level: From 70 to 99 mg / dL (from 3.9 to 5.5 mmol / L) Normal glucose level From 100 to 125 mg / dL (from 5.6 to 6.9 mmol / L) Abnormal fasting glucose (pre-diabetes) From 126 mg / dL (7.0 mmol / L) Diabetes |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
|
Changes in blood parameter: serum glucose
Time Frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Blood for the tests was drawn from basilic vein by medical personnel at the Rehabilitation Clinic. serum glucose level: From 70 to 99 mg / dL (from 3.9 to 5.5 mmol / L) Normal glucose level From 100 to 125 mg / dL (from 5.6 to 6.9 mmol / L) Abnormal fasting glucose (pre-diabetes) From 126 mg / dL (7.0 mmol / L) Diabetes |
Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Justyna Leszczak, PhD, Univeristy of Rzeszów,
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- neurological rehabilitation
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation
-
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterNational Paralympic Committee Germany (NPCG)CompletedCardiac Rehabilitation | Feasibility Studies | Organization and Administration | Rehabilitation ExerciseGermany
-
Asan Medical CenterRecruitingPulmonary Rehabilitation | Cardiac RehabilitationKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, ToursCompletedPulmonary Rehabilitation | Respiratory RehabilitationFrance
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompleted
-
Orton Orthopaedic HospitalCompleted
-
Richard Watson, PTCompletedMedial Patellar Femoral Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction RehabilitationUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Bruyere Research InstituteBruyere Academic Medical OrganizationRecruiting
-
National Cheng Kung UniversityRecruiting
-
University College AbsalonUniversity of Southern Denmark; Arla Foods; Danish Council for Independent Research and other collaboratorsCompleted
Clinical Trials on Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices among healthy subjects
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkRecruitingPolyneuropathies | Diabetic Polyneuropathy | Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) | POEMS Syndrome | Multifocal Motor Neuropathy | Charcot-Marie-Tooth | hATTR Amyloidosis | Vasculitic Neuropathy | Idiopathic NeuropathyDenmark
-
Mustafa Kemal UniversityCompletedHealthy | Health, Subjective | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTurkey
-
Cabinet de Kinesitherapie SCM Saint-AlexandreHospices Civils de Lyon; University of LyonCompletedTemporomandibular Disorder | Motor ImageryFrance
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityRecruiting
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversitySamsun Education and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityRecruitingExercise | Motivation | Sedantary ActivityTurkey
-
Uşak UniversityIstanbul University; Ankara UniversityRecruitingStroke | Quality of Life | Disability PhysicalTurkey
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityCompletedStroke | Multiple Sclerosis | Parkinson Disease | Upper Extremity Problem
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityCompletedStroke | Community IntegrationTurkey