Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Registry (SOAR)

May 20, 2018 updated by: Hospital Quality Foundation

Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Registry (SOAR): A National, Hospital-Based, Sentinel Surveillance Study of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Bleeding and Bleeding Concerns Due to the Use of Oral Anticoagulants

The goal of SOAR is to characterize the clinical and economic impact of clinicians' responses to major bleeding complications and pre-procedural concerns for bleeding risk in patients treated with oral anticoagulants (warfarin, anti-Xa orals, and anti-thrombin (IIa) orals) who present to the ED or in the hospital with acute illness or injury, with the eventual aim of informing the development of improved approaches to the management of OACs in the ED.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose and Rationale:

Until recently, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulant (OAC) available in the US, and a substantial infrastructure has developed around its management. Over the past five years, four non-Vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been approved by the FDA. The NOACs are associated with generally fewer and less severe bleeding complications, and shorter half-lives, often making management of bleeding that complicates the use of these agents less problematic than similar episodes associated with warfarin. Bleeding during NOAC therapy does occur, and patients taking NOACs sometimes require procedures that cannot be delayed, for which good hemostasis is desirable, and therefore the NOAC may delay or complicate care. The challenge of this latter issue is compounded by the lack of readily available, rapid-turnaround quantitative assays for measuring the magnitude of anticoagulation effect associated with NOAC use. From a safety perspective, the large warfarin infrastructure does not translate into useful support for use of the new NOACs; their anticoagulation impact cannot be readily monitored by simple, quick tests.

In October 2015 the first specific reversal agent for a NOAC was approved, but it is useful only for dabigatran; at present, there is no specific reversal agent for anti-Xa NOACs. Emergency care providers face many concerns and insecurities regarding the safety of warfarin and the NOACs, while working in a highly pressurized care environment, often with limited patient history and little time to consider treatment options.

Because of the unique position of the hospital ED in the US healthcare continuum, it is frequently the initial site of care for patients on OACs who develop bleeding complications. In all clinical settings, there tends to be a standardized, international normalized ratio (INR)-driven pathway for the management of warfarin-related bleeds. Many EDs and hospital pharmacies are now trying to establish similarly standardized, though not evidence-driven, pathways for NOAC-related bleeding, and eagerly await the availability of additional specific reversal agents to use in such patients.

The ED represents the key sentinel surveillance point for assessing the clinical and economic impact of bleeding concerns and complications attributable to OAC therapy. Other bleeding issues that impact the pace and nature of medical and surgical care occur in the inpatient setting, especially the ICU and surgical suite. Taken together, the hospital setting (ED plus inpatient) offers a 360-degree view of the scope, significance, and cost of OAC-related bleeds and bleeding concerns.

This registry is proposed as a large, prospective, multicenter study that identifies the clinical and economic impact of safety concerns around OAC use on evaluation and management strategies in the ED and on the inpatient units of participating hospitals. The eventual aim will be to use these data to inform the gradual development of a new, protocolized safety standard in the management of OACs in the ED.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
        • Contact:
          • Henry Wang, MD
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06102
        • Recruiting
        • Hartford Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Craig Coleman, PharmD
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Recruiting
        • Henry Ford Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Richard Nowak, MD
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Recruiting
        • Beaumont Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Carol Clark, MD
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University
        • Contact:
          • Douglas Char, MD
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11203
        • Recruiting
        • Kings County Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Richard Sinert, DO
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44913
        • Recruiting
        • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
        • Contact:
          • Sharon Mace, MD
      • Zanesville, Ohio, United States, 43701
        • Recruiting
        • Genesis Healthcare
        • Contact:
          • James Neuenschwander, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19611
        • Recruiting
        • Reading Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Adam Sigal, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 18 years and older who present to the ED or hospital with an acute illness or injury and must, in the opinion of the treating clinician, be experiencing an active anticoagulation effect due to the use of an OAC, and have either:

  1. Bleeding requiring specific intervention (see below); or
  2. Bleeding concern in a non-bleeding patient requiring a specific invasive diagnostic assessment or therapeutic intervention prompting reversal, repletion or decontamination, or a clinically significant delay in intervention due to the use of an OAC (see below).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Bleeding requiring intervention - patients must be taking an OAC and meet at least one of the following criteria:

    • Acute bleeding that is potentially life-threatening at presentation
    • Acute bleeding associated with a fall in hemoglobin level by ≥2 g/dL
    • Acute bleeding associated with a hemoglobin level of ≤8 g/dL if no baseline hemoglobin is available
    • Acute symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ
    • Any intracranial bleeding
    • Bleeding for which more than 8 hours of direct patient monitoring is required prior to ED disposition
    • Bleeding for which intravenous (IV) Vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), any prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) or activated PCC (aPCC), any specific factor replacement or reversal agent, or a parenteral hemostatic agent such as tranexamic acid is administered
    • Bleeding for which packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or platelets are transfused
  2. Bleeding Concern - patients must be taking an OAC and who, without overt bleeding, meet at least one of the following criteria:

    • Diagnostic or therapeutic surgical procedure for which hemostasis is desirable (e.g., emergency laparotomy) and which, in the opinion of the treating physician, cannot be postponed at least 8 hours
    • Diagnostic or therapeutic percutaneous procedure for which hemostasis is desirable (e.g., lumbar puncture) and which, in the opinion of the treating physician, cannot be postponed at least 8 hours
    • Overdose (deliberate or accidental) of one or more OAC agents that, in the opinion of the treating physician, requires the administration of Vitamin K, FFP, any PCC or aPCC, any specific factor replacement or specific reversal agent, or a parenteral hemostatic agent such as tranexamic acid, with the desire of immediate reversal of anticoagulation
    • Bleeding concern for which, in the opinion of the treating physician, more than 8 hours of direct patient monitoring is required prior to ED disposition

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this registry study:

  • Those who have received an investigational reversal agent for an OAC during the index event (data on these patients will be collected as part the pertinent investigational study).If during the course of SOAR enrollment an investigational reversal agent is approved, and that agent is used outside a registration study, that subject is not excluded.
  • Those who have received treatment for a bleed or bleeding concern at another facility immediately prior to being transferred to the enrolling facility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DESCRIPTIVE: timing endpoints: hours after presentation before any observed intervention
Time Frame: index hospitalization, generally less than or equal to (LTE) 7 days
  • to include time to procedure/surgery, time to infusion of one of listed medicines (PCC, aPCC, rfVIIa, idarucizumab, tranexamic acid, andexanet alfa [once approved]), type of invasive procedure/surgery, delays in procedure/surgery, relation of interventions/procedures performed to the index event, all determined by review of the medical record
  • type of invasive procedure/surgery (diagnostic/therapeutic), as documented in the medical record
  • reason for any delay in procedure, as documented in the medical record
  • procedure attributable to index event, as documented in the medical record
index hospitalization, generally less than or equal to (LTE) 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospital length of stay
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
to include length of stay (LOS) in ED, hospital, and ICU, as applicable, measured in hours or days per medical record
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
disposition after emergency care
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
location as documented in medical record: discharge home, admit inpatient (non-ICU), admit ICU, admit observation status, deceased
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
DESCRIPTIVE: blood products utilization: # units
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
number of units of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and/or platelets, as documented in the medical record
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
DESCRIPTIVE: reversal products given (with doses and timing)
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
as per medical record, the doses and time of administration of any concentrated coagulation factors, prothrombin complex concentrate, idarucizumab, or andexanet alfa
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
DESCRIPTIVE: in-hospital complications: incidence, description
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
to be classified according to surgical/medical risk
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
DESCRIPTIVE: costs of treatment
Time Frame: index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days
• to include ED and total hospital costs of blood products/components, pharmaceutical products, cost of procedures (diagnostic, interventional)
index hospitalization only, generally LTE 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Charles V Pollack, MD, Hospital Quality Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HQF-2016-SOAR-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Coagulation

Clinical Trials on mgt of bleeding concerns/complications of oral anticoagulants

3
Subscribe