Symptomatic Treatment of Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse Using Daytime Portable Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (EPOC)

The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of a portable ventilator generating positive end-expiratory pressure on exercise tolerance in patients with Excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) and tracheobronchomalacia (TBM).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC) and tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) occur due to abnormal weakening of the walls of the central airways leading to central airway collapse on expiration. This collapse is responsible for breathlessness, cough or syncope. In adults, this weakening can be idiopathic (Mounier-Khun syndrome), secondary to respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), secondary to systemic diseases such as relapsing polychondritis (RP) or secondary to invasive ventilation or trauma. The incidence of EDAC and TBM varies from 12% in all patients undergoing bronchoscopy to 44% in patients with chronic bronchitis undergoing bronchoscopy. Gold standard for the diagnosis of EDAC and TBM is bronchoscopy which identifies and quantifies the narrowing of the airway. Non-invasive technique such as inspiratory and expiratory chest computed-tomography (CT) can also be used to diagnose EDAC / TBM.

Currently, in addition to management of the underlying disease, treatment options for EDAC / TBM are limited. Surgical tracheoplasty can be offered but can be associated with severe post-operative complications. Airway stenting can also be offered but, even if this treatment improved quality of life, it fails to improve exercise capacity. Airway stenting is also associated with infectious complications as well as stent migrations. Other endoscopic treatment such as Yttrium Aluminium Perovskite laser can be offered with good results but have not yet been validated in a randomised trial. Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation (NIV) can also be used, especially in patients with associated obstructive sleep apnoeas but again there is not randomised clinical trial evidence that validates this approach in adults. Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) provides a pneumatic stenting that prevents the expiratory collapse of the airway. But, by giving the NIV during the night, patients are left without any support during the day whilst their respiratory demand is higher and when they are more symptomatic. Currently, NIV is only given at night or at rest because current non-invasive ventilators are not suitable for ambulatory use as they are heavy. Recently, a new portable ventilator with built-in battery has been issued (Z1®, Breas®). This ventilator is light (500g) portable and has a working duration of 8 hours. Therefore, it can be easily carried and used while walking. By providing a nasal pillow interface (Nasal swift®, Resmed®) to patients, it will allow them to walk safely with the device on.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with diagnosed EDAC or TBM on inspiratory/expiratory CT or bronchoscopy
  • Patient with exertional dyspnea

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Significant physical or psychiatric comorbidity that would prevent compliance with trial protocol
  • Inability to perform 6-MWT
  • Current intra-tracheal stent
  • Previous surgery for EDAC or TBM
  • Uncontrolled underlying disease:

    • Initiation of home mechanical ventilation in last 3 months
    • Uncontrolled joint pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Run In Phase
Eligible patients will have 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT) on self ventilation and on CPAP
Participants will undergo a run-in phase during which they will undergo baseline assessments. If they tolerate the portable CPAP and if their 6-MWT improves by more than 30m when performed on CPAP, they will be randomised into the trial.
Experimental: Treatment

Those patients who improve their 6-MWT by more than 30 meters will then be randomised to either:

Treatment arm - Patients will be setup onto portable CPAP during the day

Participants will be established on portable CPAP during the day with nasal pillows as an interface and requested to use it at least 8 hours/day.
Sham Comparator: Standard Care Arm

Those patients who improve their 6-MWT by more than 30 meters will then be randomised to either:

Control Arm - Standard care arm.

No change will be made to participants care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does daytime activity by an accelerometer change from baseline to 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Daytime activity assessed by an accelerometer. Participants will be assessed at baseline and at 4 weeks in the control arm and in the treatment arm with participants on portable CPAP to see if there is any change between the time frames and between the groups on daytime activity measured by accelerometers that all participants randomised into the trial will wear from baseline to follow up at 4 weeks.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance in 6-MWT on Continous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) at 4 weeks follow-up
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in exercise capacity measured by 6-MWT for all patients in the study from baseline to 4 weeks. All walk tests will be performed on portable Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
4 weeks
Change in respiratory-related quality of life - Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in quality of life from baseline to 4 weeks measured by Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire
4 weeks
Change in respiratory-related quality of life - St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in quality of life from baseline to 4 weeks measured by St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
4 weeks
Change in neural respiratory drive with parasternal electromyography
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in neural respiratory drive measured by parasternal electromyography both at rest and whilst using portable CPAP at baseline and at 4 weeks
4 weeks
Change of lung homogeneity assessed by electrical impedance tomography while on CPAP
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in lung homogeneity in participants from baseline to 4 weeks. Measured by electrical impedence tomography whilst all participants are using portable CPAP
4 weeks
Change in cross-sectional area quadriceps rectus femoris ultra-sound
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Is there a change in the area of the quadriceps rectus femoris in participants from baseline to 4 weeks. Measured using ultrasound which will be performed on all participants
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nick Hart, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Excessive Dynamic Airway Collapse

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Run In Phase

Subscribe