- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02766491
Improving Stretching Interventions for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a disorder resulting from a non-progressive lesion in the brain during pregnancy or early childhood. Children with CP show impaired movement patterns compared to typically developing (TD) children. One of the main factors limiting movement in children with CP is a reduced range of motion (ROM), which can be caused by a combination of neural and mechanical factors. Mechanical factors contributing to a reduced ROM are increased muscle/fascicle stiffness, reduced muscle length and changes in intramuscular tissue properties, all of which contribute to contractures.
Contractures are conservatively treated with stretching therapies, e.g., casting, night splints and physical therapy. However, they are very demanding for both children and parents, especially physical therapy which is painful and time-consuming. Therefore, when recommending stretching therapies, we need to assure they are efficacious. However, recent reviews show that the outcomes of stretching therapies in children with CP are highly variable.
Stretching interventions aim to improve ROM motion by increasing the overall length and/or lengthening properties of the muscle. To successfully achieve these adaptations, the muscle must experience adequate tensile stimulus during the intervention. However, it has been shown by previous studies examining muscle behaviour during stretch, that the muscle and fascicles in children with CP lengthen less than in TD children. Our own studies have confirmed this observations at the muscle, but also shown that the tendon in children with CP lengthens more during a stretch, than in TD children. These observations indicate that the higher stiffness of the target muscle relative to the in series tendon prevents the muscle fibres to experience a sufficiently large stretching stimulus, and the adaptations are small. Accordingly, in a recent study on long term stretching interventions it has been shown that muscle and fascicle strain increase, but no changes in the muscle's resting length or functional improvements have been found.
If you were to increase the stiffness of the tendon relative to the muscle prior to the stretching intervention, a greater stretching stimulus could be provided to the muscle. This would mean that for any given joint stretch the muscle will experience a greater portion of the stretch. It is well established in healthy adults and children that the stiffness of the tendon increases following resistance training. Given that well-designed resistance training is effective and safe for children with CP, the same increased tendon stiffness should follow gains in muscle strength in this group too. It is therefore hypothesise that a combined strengthening-stretching intervention would stiffen the tendon, increase the amount of stretch seen by the muscle, and thereby improve the effectiveness of stretching interventions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with spastic cerebral palsy
- GMFCS level I-III
- Have the ability to perform at least one bi-lateral heel raise.
- Aged 7 to 14
Exclusion Criteria:
- Orthopaedic or neural surgery to the lower limb 2 years prior to or planned during the intervention
- Botulinum Toxin A injections 6 months prior to or planned during the intervention.
- A learning or behaviour impairment that prevents full participation in the intervention.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Strengthening and stretching
The intervention group will follow a strengthening-stretching program of the calf muscles.
|
Strengthening exercises will be performed 4 times a week for 10 weeks. Single leg heel raises will be the preferred exercise performed. The group of participants will have a wide range of strength and functional abilities, this will be accounted for with individualised programmes. The exercise load can be reduced by switching to bilateral heel raises, giving external support, reducing the range of motion or performing the heel raises while seated. Exercise load will be progressively increased by adding weight in the form of water bottles to a rucksack worn on the participant's back. For the final six weeks of the intervention, stretching exercises of the calf muscles will be performed. |
|
Active Comparator: conventional stretching
The control group will receive conventional stretching and strengthening exercises to the upper limb to assure that the same systemic physiological stimuli and a similar number of contact hours is received.
|
This group will perform seated biceps curls 4 times a week for 10 weeks, where extra load can be added progressively by holding water bottles in the hand. For the final six weeks of the intervention, stretching exercises of the calf muscles will be performed. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change Muscle fascicle length of the Gastrocnemius (mm)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
B-mode ultrasound images will be captured at the mid muscle belly.
From these, fascicle length will be defined as the straight line distance between the upper and the lower aponeurosis parallel to the lines of collagenous tissue.
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
|
Change in Gastrocnemius muscle length (mm)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
B-mode ultrasound images will be captured of the myotendinous junction and the medial femoral condyl.
Muscle length will be defined as the straight line distance between these two anatomical points.
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in ankle range of motion (degree)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
The difference in ankle angle measured at maximal plantar flexion and maximal dorsi flexion with a goniometer
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
|
Change in Achilles tendon stiffness (Nm)
Time Frame: at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 10 weeks
|
Tendon stiffness is quantified as the change in tendon length per change in tendon force. Tendon lengthening will be quantified, using B-mode ultrasound, from the displacement of the myotendinous junction during the MVC trials. Tendon force will be calculated from the ratio of nett joint moment to Achilles tendon moment arm. |
at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 10 weeks
|
|
Change in maximal dorsiflexion angle during gait (degree)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
Maximal dorsiflexion angles will be quantified from kinematic data obtained during the gait analysis
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
|
Change in lengthening properties of the muscle fascicles (mm)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
The ankle will be moved passively through the full range of motion.
B-mode ultrasound images of the mid belly of the medial gastrocnemius will be collected throughout on which muscle fascicle lengthening will be measured
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
|
Changes in step length during gait (m)
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
Step length will be quantified from the kinematic data obtained during the gait analysis
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
|
Changes in ankle power at push of during gait
Time Frame: at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
Ankle power will be quantified from kinematic and kinetic data obtained during the gait analysis
|
at baseline and after 10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Thomas D O'Brien, PhD, Liverpool John Moores University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Stretching_CP_V1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
Clinical Trials on Strengthening and stretching
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedMusculoskeletal PainPakistan
-
University of FaisalabadRecruitingScapular DyskinesisPakistan
-
King Saud UniversityMajmaah UniversityCompletedPostural; DefectSaudi Arabia
-
Mayo ClinicGeneral Electric; TRIA Orthopaedic CenterCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
University of CalgaryCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Biomechanigg Research Ltd.UnknownLeg Injuries | RunningCanada
-
Mahidol UniversityThailand Research FundCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeBrazil
-
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityCompletedFrailty | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentTaiwan