- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02798354
Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics (Project RedDE)
Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics
The proposal will focus on 3 specific, high-risk, pediatric ambulatory diagnostic errors each representing a unique dimension of diagnostic assessment: evaluation of symptoms, evaluation of signs and follow-up of diagnostic tests. Adolescent depression (i.e. symptoms) affects nearly 10% of teenagers, is misdiagnosed in almost 75% of adolescents and causes significant morbidity. Pediatric elevated blood pressure (signs) is misdiagnosed in 74-87% of patients, often due to inaccurate application of blood pressure parameters that change based on age, gender and height. Actionable pediatric laboratory values (diagnostic tests) are potentially delayed up to 26% of the time in preliminary investigations and 7-65% in adults, leading to harm and malpractice claims.
The investigators propose to conduct a multisite, prospective, stepped wedge cluster randomized trial testing a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) intervention within the American Academy of Pediatrics' Quality Improvement Innovation Networks (QuIIN) to reduce the incidence of pediatric primary care diagnostic errors. QuIIN is a national network of over 300 primary care practices, ranging from tertiary care academic medical centers to single practitioner private practices, interested in and experienced with QICs. Because many processes are likely to be common across diagnostic errors in outpatient settings, a multifaceted intervention, such as a QIC, has a high likelihood of success and broad applicability across populations. Preparatory inquiries to QuIIN primary care providers suggest high interest in reducing these 3 diagnostic errors and provider agreement with randomization to evaluate diagnostic error interventions. Practices will be randomized to one of three groups, with each group collecting retrospective baseline data on one error above, and then intervening to reduce that error during the first eight months. Each group will concurrently collect control data on an error they are not intervening on during those eight months. Following those eight months, the groups will continue intervening on their first error, begin intervening on the error they were a control site for, and begin collecting data on the third error for which they will be a control site for. Finally, in the final eight months, all groups will intervene on all three errors. A second wave of practices will be recruited to join the groups after eight months and will only intervene on two of the three errors.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Objectives:
Primary
• To determine whether a QIC consisting of evidence-based best-practice methodologies, mini-root cause analyses, data sharing, and behavior change techniques, is associated with a reduction in 3 specific diagnostic error rates in a national group of pediatric primary care practices.
- Hypothesis 1: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 40% reduction in missed diagnosis of adolescent depression.
- Hypothesis 2: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 30% reduction in missed diagnosis of pediatric elevated blood pressure.
- Hypothesis 3: Implementation of a QIC will lead to a 45% reduction in delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory results.
Secondary
- To determine if a QIC's effect changes for wave 1 versus wave 2 participants, or for the second versus the first error a practice intervenes on.
- To further investigate the epidemiology of three ambulatory pediatric diagnostic errors: missed diagnosis of adolescent depression, missed diagnosis of pediatric elevated blood pressure, and delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory results.
- To evaluate patient outcomes related to these diagnoses including outcomes after positive depression screening, missed elevated blood pressure screening and delayed diagnosis of actionable laboratory values.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States, 60007
- American Academy of Pediatrics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The investigators will include 30 primary care pediatric practices that are part of the American Academy of Pediatrics' QuIIN (Quality Improvement Innovation Networks) organization. The second wave will recruit 15 additional practices.
- Practices must have sufficient volumes of adolescent well child visits (17 per month) and all well child visits (30 per month), and be able to query their EHR systems in order to be included in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Reduce Elevated Blood Pressure Errors First
Will provide baseline data on elevated blood pressure diagnosis and first intervene to reduce missed opportunities for elevated blood pressure diagnosis. Will then intervene to reduce missed opportunities for depression diagnosis and finally, intervene to reduce delayed diagnosis attributable to abnormal laboratory values. Quality Improvement Collaborative Intervention will consist of behavioral components, i.e., training, interactions with experts, root cause analyses of errors, idea sharing, best practices dissemination, etc. |
1)Every 8 month 1-2 day interactive webinar learning sessions 2)Monthly webinars sharing best practices 3)Monthly team interactions with dedicated QI coach 4)Monthly data submission on both process and outcome measures 5)Monthly data feedback both at aggregate level with full inter-team transparency as well as at institutional level 6)Monthly mini root cause analyses performed on 1 error at each site 7)Multidisciplinary teams consisting of at least a physician, nurse, and office practice associate 8)Instruction on best practices from content area experts in QI, diagnostic errors, hypertension, mental health, leadership, behavior change, Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) and EHRs 9)Ongoing sharing of best ideas and barriers/issues among institutional teams
|
Experimental: Reduce Depression Errors First
Will provide baseline data on depression diagnosis and first intervene to reduce missed opportunities for depression diagnosis. Will then intervene to reduce delayed diagnosis attributable to abnormal laboratory values and finally, intervene to reduce missed opportunities for elevated blood pressure diagnosis. Quality Improvement Collaborative Intervention will consist of behavioral components, i.e., training, interactions with experts, root cause analyses of errors, idea sharing, best practices dissemination, etc. |
1)Every 8 month 1-2 day interactive webinar learning sessions 2)Monthly webinars sharing best practices 3)Monthly team interactions with dedicated QI coach 4)Monthly data submission on both process and outcome measures 5)Monthly data feedback both at aggregate level with full inter-team transparency as well as at institutional level 6)Monthly mini root cause analyses performed on 1 error at each site 7)Multidisciplinary teams consisting of at least a physician, nurse, and office practice associate 8)Instruction on best practices from content area experts in QI, diagnostic errors, hypertension, mental health, leadership, behavior change, Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) and EHRs 9)Ongoing sharing of best ideas and barriers/issues among institutional teams
|
Experimental: Reduce Lab Related Errors First
Will provide baseline data on delayed diagnosis attributable to abnormal laboratory values and first intervene to reduce delayed diagnosis attributable to abnormal laboratory values. Will then intervene to reduce missed opportunities for elevated blood pressure diagnosis results and finally, to reduce missed opportunities for depression diagnosis. Quality Improvement Collaborative Intervention will consist of behavioral components, i.e., training, interactions with experts, root cause analyses of errors, idea sharing, best practices dissemination, etc. |
1)Every 8 month 1-2 day interactive webinar learning sessions 2)Monthly webinars sharing best practices 3)Monthly team interactions with dedicated QI coach 4)Monthly data submission on both process and outcome measures 5)Monthly data feedback both at aggregate level with full inter-team transparency as well as at institutional level 6)Monthly mini root cause analyses performed on 1 error at each site 7)Multidisciplinary teams consisting of at least a physician, nurse, and office practice associate 8)Instruction on best practices from content area experts in QI, diagnostic errors, hypertension, mental health, leadership, behavior change, Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) and EHRs 9)Ongoing sharing of best ideas and barriers/issues among institutional teams
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Adolescents Diagnosed With Depression Seen in Well Child Visits
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Patients >=11 years old with documentation of major depression or subsyndromal depression diagnoses in the medical record
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure Measured and Appropriately Acted on by Providers
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure >= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or >=120/80 in >=3 years old patients at well child visits and at least one of: 1) provider repeated blood pressure, 2) clinic note mentions elevated blood pressure/hypertension 3) plan included recheck or evaluation of blood pressure, or 4) ordering laboratory or other studies to evaluate elevated blood pressure
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results With Appropriate Actions Without Delay
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Documented action step for first positive within 30 days:
Documented action step for first positive within 7 days:
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Adolescents With Mental Health Addressed During Their Well Child Visit
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Provider screened for mental health concerns either with standard screening tool or clinical judgement and documented mental health concerns or no mental health concerns.
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Blood Pressure Percentiles Documented in the Chart
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-0 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure >= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or >=120/80 in >=3 years old patients at well child visits with blood pressure percentiles documented per the 4th Report.
|
Collected Monthly (5-0 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Number of Patients With Elevated Blood Pressures Measured and Recognized by Provider
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure >= 90th percentile for age, gender and height or >=120/80 in >=3 years old patients at well child visits with provider documentation of abnormal blood pressure or appropriate action taken
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Results Received and Recognized by Provider
Time Frame: Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Provider documentation of abnormal laboratory value, of appropriate diagnosis (e.g.
iron deficiency anemia) or appropriate action taken without delay as defined above.
|
Collected Monthly (5-9 baseline months and 8-9 intervention months depending on the enrolled cohort)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-Determined Threshold for Providers With Laboratory Results Unread/Unacknowledged in Their Electronic Health Record (EHR) Inbox for More Than 72 Hrs
Time Frame: Collected at 4 months
|
Clinics reported percent of EHR inboxes with laboratory results unread/unacknowledged in their electronic health record (EHR) inbox for more than 72 hrs each month.
They reported whether this percentage was equal to or less than 10%, the pre-determined threshold.
They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.
|
Collected at 4 months
|
Percent of Clinics Reaching Pre-determined Threshold for Children Greater Than or Equal to 3 Yrs Old Receiving Blood Pressure Measurements at Triage for Well Child Visits
Time Frame: Collected until 2 months
|
Clinics reported percent of well child visit charts with blood pressure measurements at triage done each month.
They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold.
They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.
|
Collected until 2 months
|
Percent of Clinics Reaching Predetermined Threshold for Adolescents Screened for Depression With Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Modified (PHQ-9M) During Well Child Visits
Time Frame: Collected monthly for 8 months when practice is intervening on this topic
|
Clinics reported percent of adolescent well child visit charts with depression screening done each month.
They reported whether this percentage was equal to or greater than 90%, the pre-determined threshold.
They only collected this process measure until they were compliant with the threshold for 2 consecutive months.
|
Collected monthly for 8 months when practice is intervening on this topic
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-3980
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Errors
-
University of MichiganAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity of California, San Francisco; Agency for Healthcare Research and...Not yet recruitingDiagnostic ErrorsUnited States
-
University of IowaCompleted
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Loyola UniversityCompletedDecision Support Systems, Clinical | Medical Errors | Diagnostic ErrorsUnited States
-
EyeQue Corp.Sheba Medical CenterRecruitingRefractive Errors | Accomodation | Diagnostic Self EvaluationIsrael
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedPatients Requiring a Diagnostic and/or Interventional Diagnostic ProcedureGermany
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedDiagnostic Imaging | Cancer Diagnosis | Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresUnited States
-
Radiometer Medical ApSRecruiting
-
Erasme University HospitalCompletedDiagnostic GastroscopyBelgium
-
BayerCompleted
Clinical Trials on Quality Improvement Collaborative
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedVentilator Associated Pneumonia | Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)United States
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityChinese Neonatal NetworkWithdrawnMortality | Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation | Quality Improvement | Intracranial Hemorrhage | Extracorporeal Life Support | Neonate
-
University of California, San FranciscoInnovations for Poverty ActionCompletedMaternal Health | Family Planning | DeliveryKenya
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghai Children's Medical Center; Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnMorbidity;Newborn | MoralityChina
-
University of California, San FranciscoPopulation Services InternationalCompleted
-
Karolinska InstitutetThe Swedish Research Council; ForteRecruitingContraception | Post Partum | ImmigrantSweden
-
City University of New York, School of Public HealthHanoi University of Public HealthRecruiting
-
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health...Inter-American Development BankUnknownColorectal NeoplasmsArgentina
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation...Completed
-
Duke UniversityNorthwestern University; Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedSickle Cell DiseaseUnited States