Neural Tensioner Exercise on Conditioned Pain Modulation

March 8, 2017 updated by: Josue Fernandez Carnero, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Effectiveness of Neural Tensioner Exercise on Conditioned Pain Modulation, Disability and Range of Motion in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: There is evidence linking conditioned pain modulation (CPM) deficiency with musculoskeletal pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia, migraine, tension-type headaches and irritable bowel syndrome, as well as with temporomandibular disorders, idiopathic facial pain and chronic fatigue syndrome. Evidence shows that in pre-surgical situations of chronic pain there is no activation of CPM.

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to measure the CPM response and determine whether neural tensioner exercise in patients with chronic neck pain is effective in the improvement of neck pain intensity, neck disability and cervical range of motion.

Design: Double-blind, randomized placebo clinical trial. Methods: Patients with neck pain will be randomly allocated into two groups: the neural tensionner exercise group (NTE) or the sham technique (ST) group.

Individuals will be included in the study if they meet the following inclusion criteria: aged 18-65 years, neck pain perceived in the posterior region of the cervical spine, from the superior nuchal line to the first thoracic spinous process with more than 12 weeks of evolution and without radicular symptoms radiated to the head. Neck pain intensity with a visual analogue scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), CPM, and cervical rang of motion will be measured pre and port intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18-65 years.
  • neck pain perceived in the posterior region of the cervical spine, from the superior nuchal line to the first thoracic spinous process with more than 12 weeks of evolution and without radicular symptoms radiated to the head, trunk, and/or the upper limbs.
  • the ability to understand, write, and speak Spanish fluently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • development of systemic or degenerative diseases;
  • symptoms of depression according to Beck's questionnaire.
  • pain in any area between the lower back and the head in the last 9 months.
  • neck pain associated with whiplash injuries.
  • medical red flag history (i.e., tumour, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis). - neck pain with cervical radiculopathy.
  • neck pain associated with externalized cervical disc herniation.
  • fibromyalgia syndrome.
  • previous neck surgery.
  • neck pain accompanied by vertigo caused by vertebrobasilar insufficiency or accompanied by non-cervicogenic headaches due to a traumatic event in the past 12 months.
  • and history of neck or face pain in the last 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: neural tensionner exercise
This group will receive a specific tensionner nerve exercise to provide mechanical stress across the median nerve. This technique have two positions, start and end. It consists on going from one to the other position constantly, controlling the speed of the technique to be constant. In the start position, the subject will be supine lying on a couch with the following parameters: contralateral cervical side bending, shoulder depression, shoulder abduction and external rotation to 90°, elbow flexion to 90º, and forearm supination. In the final position, the therapist will perform full elbow extension while maintaining all the joints previously situated as described above until the patients feel tension, then return to the start position.
manual therapy with neural exercise will be applied on patients with neck pain
Placebo Comparator: sham neural tensionner exercise
The control group will receive a sham technique (ST) with minimal mechanical stress across the median nerve. Patients will be placed in neutral cervical spine position with no shoulder depression, shoulder abduction and external rotation to 45°, 45° of elbow extension, and forearm pronation.. This technique will be passively repeated from elbow flexion to extension in the same way than the NTE group
manual therapy with neural exercise will be applied on patients with neck pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological parameter
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Conditioned pain modulation: Diffusse noxious inhibitory control sistem will be measure with torniquete test
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Neck pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale (VAS)
5 minutes
physiological movement
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Cervical range of motion measured with cervical range of motion device
5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 14/2013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on manual therapy

Subscribe