Proadrenomedullin for Early Risk Assessment in the Emergency Department (ADRISK)

March 17, 2017 updated by: Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, M.D., University of Athens

A Prospective Clinical Trial of the Efficacy of Mid-regional Proadrenomedullin in the Triage and Multi-dimensional Risk Assessment of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department

The study ia aiming to the assessment of Mid-Regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) as a novel biomarker that can provide accurate short-, mid- and long term prognostic information in the triage and multi-dimensional risk assessment of patients in the Emergency Department (ED). A clinical algorithm with predefined MR-proADM cut-off values: <0.75 nmol/L (low risk), 0.75 nmol/L≥ and ≤ 1.5 nmol/L (intermediate risk); >1.5 nmol/L is pre-defined. Based on these cut-off values, a prespecified algorithm aiming to predict i) reduction of hospitalization in the ward/ICU and increase of out-patient treatment (rule-out of risk); and ii) reduce adverse complications (identify patients at risk) will be applied and compared with the initial clinical decision.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Emergency departments (ED) are becoming increasingly over-crowded, with patients facing prolonged waiting times. This is further aggravated by the shortage of available hospital space. Therefore, a safe and rapid triaging of patients is essential in improving the workflow within the ED, maximizing patient safety and comfort, and alleviating any unnecessary financial burden from the healthcare provider.

Adrenomedullin (ADM), a 52 amino acid peptide, is a member of the calcitonin peptide family and is widely expressed in many tissues and organs. It has been shown to have a variety of physiological functions, including immune-modulating, direct bactericidal, diuretic and potent vasodilatory activity. In healthy subjects, ADM circulates at low picomolar concentrations. In many pathological states such as hypertension, renal failure, lower respiratory diseases and septic shock, plasma levels of adrenomedulin are significantly up-regulated in proportion to disease severity. These unique properties makes it a potentially useful marker in determination of the patients most at risk of developing complications on admission to the ED, in order to rapidly triage and administer the most effective treatment in the shortest possible time.

However, reliable measurement of ADM is challenging due to a number of issues, such as: a short half time of 22 minutes; rapid degradation by proteases; and binding to complement factor H. Therefore, the increased stability of its precursor molecule, Mid-Regional(MR)-proADM, allows it to be reliably measured as a surrogate biomarker for the unstable ADM in a 1:1 ratio. The aim of this study is the assessment of MR-proADM as a novel biomarker that can provide accurate short-, mid- and long term prognostic information in the triage and multi-dimensional risk assessment of patients in the ED setting.

ADM, present mainly in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, can act as both a hormone and cytokine (often termed a "hormokine) in an autocrine and paracrine manner. Its potent vasodilatory and hypotensive response is elicited through an initial increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, and a subsequent production of nitric oxide. The importance of ADM in homeostasis is illustrated by its central role in the up- and down- regulation of cytokines and other mediators, as well as its own stimulatory and inhibitory effect on cytokine production. Indeed, interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) are two of the most potent triggers for ADM production. It is also up-regulated by hypoxia, bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and shear stress. Moreover, ADM has potent antimicrobial actions through membrane channel formation and lysis, and anti-apoptotic properties, it enhances renal excretion of sodium, decreases aldosterone synthesis and increases renal blood flow and urine volume. The ubiquitous and important functional role of ADM results in its clinical use in many diverse indications. Its precursor molecule, MR-proADM, has been shown to be a powerful risk assessment marker in sepsis and lower respiratory tract infections with the ability to predict 30 day mortality regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Plasma concentrations of MR-proADM have been also shown to be elevated in myocardial infarction, and to correlate with the severity of acute and chronic heart failure. Furthermore, it has been shown that it outperforms BNP and NT-BNP in predicting mortality in ED patients with dyspnea after 30 days8-12. MR-proADM is also elevated in various types of glomerulonephritis and progressively increased in patients with chronic renal failure (CKD) and has greater predictive accuracy in determining risk of CKD progression, compared to standard GFR measurements.

MR-proADM is determined in plasma EDTA samples by an automated immunofluorescent assay (Thermo ScientificTM BRAHMSTM MR-proADM KRYPTORTM). Healthy individuals have detectable levels of MR-proADM of approximately 0.4nmol/L. The functional assay sensitivity has been assessed as being 0.25 nmol/L. Levels of MR-proADM are not influenced by food or water intake and there are no significant gender-related differences, which optimize its use in risk assessment. Furthermore, it remains stable up to 72 hours in EDTA plasma at room temperature and over four freeze/ thaw cycles.

In a previous study, an algorithm has been validated using MR-proADM cut-off values together with clinical risk assessment by the ED physician. The application of this model could potentially lead to an increase of patients safely discharged from the hospital falling into the low risk category. It has been shown that the prognostic information of this model could enhance the appropriateness of disposition decisions of patients presenting to the ED with non-specific complaints (NSC).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Athens, Greece, 12462
        • 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admitted in the emergency department of ATTIKON University General Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age more than or equal to 18 years
  • Written informed consent provided by the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

High-risk for death the first 24 hours post admission i.e. moribund patients unlikely to thrive as defined by the attending physicians

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ProADM for risk prediction
Time Frame: 28 days
Analysis of a predefined algorithm by MR-proADM cut-off values (<0.75 nmol/L as low risk, 0.75 nmol/L≥ and ≤ 1.5 nmol/L as intermediate risk and >1.5 nmol/L as high-risk) to rule-out the risk of unfavorable outcome.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
proADM for final diagnosis
Time Frame: 28 days
To analyze a predifined algorithm of MR-proAMD and to evaluate relationship with final diagnosis
28 days
ProADM for risk prediction in real-life
Time Frame: 28 days
To analyze a predifined algorithm of MR-proAMD trying to develop an algorithm for decision-making in real-life
28 days
proADM as predictor of outcome
Time Frame: 28 days
To analyze a predifined algorithm of MR-proAMD trying to answer if it is an independent predictor of final outcome based on multivariate models
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evangelos Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01 (Miami VAHS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatal Outcome

3
Subscribe