Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion of Faster-acting Insulin Aspart Compared to NovoRapid® in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (Onset® 5)

November 12, 2019 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S
This trial is conducted in Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of this trial is to investigate efficacy and safety of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion of Faster-acting Insulin Aspart compared to NovoRapid® in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

472

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arlon, Belgium, 6700
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1090
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Sint-Niklaas, Belgium, 9100
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4N 7L3
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Concord, Ontario, Canada, L4K 4M2
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6M 1M1
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4G 3E8
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0A9
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • LA ROCHELLE cedex, France, 17019
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Le Creusot, France, 71200
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • MONTPELLIER cedex 5, France, 34295
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Narbonne, France, 11108
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saint Herblain, France, 44800
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • TOULOUSE cedex, France, 31054
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Venissieux, France, 69200
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Bad Mergentheim, Germany, 97980
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Essen, Germany, 45136
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Friedrichsthal, Germany, 66299
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22607
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67059
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Münster, Germany, 48145
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Neuwied, Germany, 56564
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Rehlingen-Siersburg, Germany, 66780
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Rostock, Germany, 18057
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands, 7334 DZ
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5631 BM
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hoofddorp, Netherlands, 2134 TM
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Hoogeveen, Netherlands, 7909 AA
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3011 TA
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Venlo, Netherlands, 5912 BL
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Cheboksary, Russian Federation, 428009
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117036
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630117
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195257
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199034
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 190068
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199226
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Saratov, Russian Federation, 410039
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194354
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Yoshkar-Ola, Russian Federation, 424004
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1525
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Novo mesto, Slovenia, 8000
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Guildford, United Kingdom, GU2 7XX
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Harrogate, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom, HG2 7SX
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 0JE
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • St Helens, United Kingdom, WA9 3DA
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • California
      • Encino, California, United States, 91436
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Roseville, California, United States, 95661
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • San Mateo, California, United States, 94401
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • San Ramon, California, United States, 94583
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94598
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30339
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404-7596
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States, 60005-4144
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40503
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20852
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55416
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • New Hampshire
      • Nashua, New Hampshire, United States, 03063
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12206
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28803
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224-2215
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37411
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37404-1192
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79106
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78749
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Mesquite, Texas, United States, 75149
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Federal Way, Washington, United States, 98003
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
      • Renton, Washington, United States, 98057
        • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, age at least 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent
  • Diagnosed with T1DM (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus) (based on clinical judgement and/or supported by laboratory analysis as per local guidelines) equal or above 1 year prior to the day of screening
  • Using the same Medtronic pump (Minimed 530G (551/751), Paradigm Veo (554/754), Paradigm Revel (523/723), Paradigm (522/722)) for CSII in a basal-bolus regimen with a rapid acting insulin analogue for at least six months prior to screening and willing to stay on the same pump model throughout the trial (if the model is changed the change should not exceed 7 consecutive days.)
  • HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0-9.0% (53-75 mmol/mol) as assessed by central laboratory at screening
  • Body mass index (BMI) below or equal to 35.0 kg/m^2 at screening
  • Ability and willingness to take at least 3 daily meal-time insulin bolus infusions every day throughout the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening
  • Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening
  • History of hospitalization for ketoacidosis below or equal to 180 days prior to the day of screening
  • Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before screening
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, might jeopardise a Subject's safety or compliance with the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Faster-acting insulin aspart CSII
Injected s.c. /subcutaneously (under the skin)
Active Comparator: NovoRapid® CSII
Injected s.c. /subcutaneously (under the skin)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period. In-trial period: the observation period from date of randomisation until last trial-related subject-site contact.
Week 0, week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in 1-hour PPG Increment
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in 1-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) increment was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, Week 16
Change From Baseline in 1,5-anhydroglucitol
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in 1,5-anhydroglucitol was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Time Spent in Low IG (≤3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) During CGM
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in low interstitial glucose (IG) (≤3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) during continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Percentage of Subjects Reaching HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of subjects reaching HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. Subjects without an HbA1c measurement at week 16 were considered not to have achieved HbA1c target at week 16. The results are based on the in-trial period.
Week 16
Percentage of Subjects Reaching HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of subjects reaching HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without treatment emergent severe hypoglycaemic episodes was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. Subjects without an HbA1c measurement at week 16 were considered not to have achieved HbA1c target at week 16. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose (PG) concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of PG to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low PG concentration. Treatment emergent: hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of IMP administration after randomisation (in week 0) and no later than one day after the last day on IMP (i.e., maximum week 16 + 1 day). The results are based on the in-trial period.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in 30-min, 1-hour, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour PPG (Meal Test)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in 30-minute, 1-hour, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour postprandial glucose (PPG [meal test]) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period. Meal test: The subjects were given a carbohydrate-rich standardised liquid meal immediately after bolus (faster aspart or NovoRapid®) infusion in the morning of the meal test. The subjects were to consume the meal as quickly as possible (within 12 minutes) and blood samples were drawn after 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours from the start of the meal.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in 30-min, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour PPG Increment (Meal Test)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in 30-min, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour PPG increment (meal test) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period. Meal test: The subjects were given a carbohydrate-rich standardised liquid meal immediately after bolus (faster aspart or NovoRapid®) infusion in the morning of the meal test. The subjects were to consume the meal as quickly as possible (within 12 minutes) and PPG was evaluated after 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours from the start of the meal.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Mean of the 7-7-9 Point Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period. 7-7-9 point SMPG was measured at the following mentioned time points: 1) Before breakfast, 2) 60 mins after the start of Breakfast, 3) Before lunch, 4) 60 mins after the start of lunch, 5) Before main evening meal, 6) 60 mins after the start of main evening meal, 7) At bedtime, 8) At 4 AM, 9) Before breakfast.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline of the 7-7-9 Point SMPG Profile: PPG (Mean, Breakfast, Lunch and Main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in PPG (breakfast, lunch, main evening meal and mean over all meals) of the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline of the 7-7-9 Point SMPG Profile: PPG Increment (Mean, Breakfast, Lunch and Main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in PPG increment (breakfast, lunch, main evening meal and mean over all meals) of the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline of the 7-7-9 Point SMPG Profile: Pre-prandial Plasma Glucose (PG) (Mean, Pre-breakfast, Pre-lunch, Pre-main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in pre-prandial PG (pre-breakfast, pre-lunch, pre-main evening meal and mean over all meals) of the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline of the 7-7-9 Point SMPG Profile: Fluctuation in 7-7-9 Point Profile
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Fluctuation in 7-point SMPG profile was the average absolute difference from the mean of the SMPG profile. Reported results are fluctuation in the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation (i.e., week 16). The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline of the 7-7-9 Point SMPG Profile: in Nocturnal SMPG Measurements
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in nocturnal SMPG measurements was assessed by considering the differences between PG values available at bedtime, at 4 AM and the before breakfast value the following day: (4 AM PG value minus at bedtime PG value), (before breakfast PG value minus at bedtime PG value) and (before breakfast PG value minus 4 AM PG value). Change from baseline in nocturnal increments in SMPG measurements of the 7-7-9 point SMPG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation and presented during three different time intervals as follows: 1) 04:00 to breakfast, 2) bedtime to 04:00, and 3) bedtime to breakfast. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Percentage of Subjects Reaching Overall PPG (1 Hour) ≤7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL]
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of subjects reaching overall PPG (1 hour) ≤7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL] was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. Subjects without a postprandial glucose measurement at week 16 were considered not to have achieved HbA1c target at week 16. The results are based on the in-trial period.
Week 16
Percentage of Subjects Reaching Overall PPG (1 Hour) ≤7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL] Without Severe Hypoglycaemia
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of subjects reaching overall PPG (1 hour) ≤7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL] without treatment emergent severe hypoglycaemia was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. Subjects without a postprandial glucose measurement at week 16 were considered not to have achieved HbA1c target at week 16. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose (PG) concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of PG to normal was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low PG concentration. The results are based on the in-trial period.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in Lipids-lipoproteins Profile (Total Cholesterol, High Density Lipoproteins, Low Density Lipoproteins)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are lipids-lipoproteins (total cholesterol, high density lipoproteins, low density lipoproteins) values at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/Day: Total Basal
Time Frame: Week 16
Total basal insulin dose (Units/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period. On-treatment period: the observation period from date of first dose of randomised trial products (faster aspart and NovoRapid®) to no later than 7 days after the day of last dose of randomised trial products.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/Day: Total Bolus
Time Frame: Week 16
Total bolus insulin dose (Units/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/Day: Total Daily Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Week 16
Total insulin dose (Units/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/Day: Individual Meal Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Week 16
No data was collected for individual meal insulin dose.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/kg/Day: Total Basal
Time Frame: Week 16
Total basal insulin dose (Units/kg/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/kg/Day: Total Bolus
Time Frame: Week 16
Total bolus insulin dose (Units/kg/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/kg/Day: Total Daily Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Week 16
Total insulin dose (Units/kg/day) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Dose in Units/kg/Day: Individual Meal Insulin Dose
Time Frame: Week 16
No data was collected for individual meal insulin dose.
Week 16
Insulin Delivery Pump Parameter: Insulin Carbohydrate Ratio
Time Frame: Week 16
Insulin carbohydrate ratio was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Delivery Pump Parameter: Glucose Sensitivity Factor
Time Frame: Week 16
Glucose sensitivity factor was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Insulin Delivery Pump Parameter: Active Insulin Time
Time Frame: Week 16
Active insulin time was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in Mean IG Increment (0-30 Min, 0-1 Hour and 0-2 Hours After Start of Meal) (Mean, Breakfast, Lunch and Main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in mean interstitial glucose (IG) increment (0-30 minutes (min), 0-1 hour (h) and 0-2 h after start of meal) (breakfast, lunch, main evening meal and mean across all meals) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Mean Time to the IG Peak After Start of Meal (Mean, Breakfast, Lunch and Main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in mean time to the IG peak after start of meal (breakfast, lunch, main evening meal and mean across all meals) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Mean IG Peak After Start of Meal (Mean, Breakfast, Lunch and Main Evening Meal)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in mean IG peak after start of meal (breakfast, lunch, main evening meal and mean across all meals) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Percentage of Time Spent With IG ≤2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 3.9 mmol/L [45, 54, 63, 70 mg/dL]) and IG >10.0, 12.0, 13.9 mmol/L [180, 216, 250 mg/dL])
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of time spent with IG ≤2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 3.9 mmol/L [45, 54, 63, 70 mg/dL]) and IG >10.0, 12.0, 13.9 mmol/L [180, 216, 250 mg/dL]) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 16
Incidence of Episodes With IG ≤2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 3.9 mmol/L [45, 54, 63, 70 mg/dL]) and IG >10.0, 12.0, 13.9 mmol/L [180, 216, 250 mg/dL])
Time Frame: Week 16
Incidence of episodes with IG ≤2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 3.9 mmol/L [45, 54, 63, 70 mg/dL]) and IG >10.0, 12.0, 13.9 mmol/L [180, 216, 250 mg/dL]) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in Mean of the IG Profile
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of the IG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The mean of an IG profile is defined as the time integral of the profile over the profile's length, divided by the profile's length. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Percentage of Time Spent Within IG Target Range 4.0-7.8 mmol/L (71-140 mg/dL) and 4.0-10 mmol/L (71-180 mg/dL)
Time Frame: Week 16
Percentage of time spent within IG target range 4.0-7.8 mmol/L (71-140 mg/dL) and 4.0-10 mmol/L (71-180 mg/dL) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 16
Variation in the IG Profile
Time Frame: Week 16
Variation in IG profile was the average absolute difference from the mean of the IG profile. Variation in the IG profile was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 16
Area Under the Curve (AUC3.9-IG) for IG ≤3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]
Time Frame: Week 16
Area under the curve (AUC3.9-IG) for IG ≤3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL] was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in AUCIG,0-15min
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in area under the curve for interstitial glucose (AUCIG),0-15 minutes during meal test was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in AUCIG,0-30min
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in AUCIG,0-30 minutes during meal test was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in AUCIG,0-1h
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in AUCIG,0-1 hour during meal test was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in AUCIG,0-2h
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in AUCIG,0-2 hours during meal test was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in AUCIG,0-4h
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in AUCIG,0-24hours during meal test was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Time to the IG Peak After Start of Meal
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in time to the IG peak after start of meal-test meal was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in IG Peak After Start of Meal
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in IG peak after start of meal-test meal was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last in-trial value, which included the last available measurement in the in-trial period.
Week 0, week 16
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 16. A TEAE was defined as an event that has an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment (in week 0), and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment (i.e., maximum week 16 + 7 days). The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Infusion Site Reactions
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent infusion site reactions were recorded from week 0 to week 16. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Novo Nordisk (NN) Definition: Overall
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16

ADA classification of hypo:

  1. Severe: Requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate/glucagon/take other corrective actions. PG levels may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery following return of PG to normal is considered sufficient evidence that event was induced by a low PG level.
  2. Documented symptomatic: PG ≤3.9 mmol/L with symptoms.
  3. Asymptomatic: PG ≤3.9 mmol/L without symptoms.
  4. Probable symptomatic: No measurement with symptoms.
  5. Pseudo: PG >3.9 mmol/L with symptoms.
  6. Unclassifiable.

NN classification of hypo:

  1. BG confirmed: PG <3.1 mmol/L with/without symptoms.
  2. Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic: Severe as per ADA and BG confirmed by PG <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms.
  3. Severe or BG confirmed: Severe as per ADA and BG confirmed by PG <3.1 mmol/L with/without symptoms.
  4. Unclassifiable.

Not able to self treat-unclassifiable: Not able to self treat but not classifiable as severe hypo.

Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and Novo Nordisk Definition: Daytime Hypoglycaemic Episodes (06:00-00:00 - Inclusive)
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent day time hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 06:00 and 00:00 (both included). The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and Novo Nordisk Definition: Nocturnal Hypoglycaemic Episodes (00:01-05:59 - Inclusive)
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 00:01 and 05:59 (both included). The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and Novo Nordisk Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes During First 1 Hour After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated during the first 1 hour after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and NN Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes During First 2 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated during the first 2 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and NN Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes During First 4 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated during the first 4 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and NN Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes Occurring Between 2 to 4 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 2 to 4 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and NN Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes Occurring Between 1 Hour to 2 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 1 hour to 2 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and Novo Nordisk Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes Occurring Between 2 to 3 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 2 to 3 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to the American Diabetes Association and Novo Nordisk Definition: Hypoglycaemic Episodes Occurring Between 3 to 4 Hours After Start of the Meal
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to the ADA and NN definitions were evaluated between 3 to 4 hours after start of the meal. The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Number of Unexplained Episodes of Hyperglycaemia (Confirmed by SMPG)
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
Unexplained hyperglycaemia was defined as a confirmed PG value ≥16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL) and was unexplained (i.e. no apparent medical, dietary, insulin dosage or pump failure reason). The results are based on the on-treatment period.
Weeks 0-16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Respiratory System
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are respiratory system-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular System
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are cardiovascular system-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous System
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are central and peripheral nervous system-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System, Including the Mouth
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are gastrointestinal system-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Musculoskeletal System
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are musculoskeletal system-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Skin
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are skin-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Physical Examination: Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat and Neck
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are head, ears, eyes, nose, throat and neck-examination findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign: Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign: Pulse
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Screening in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are ECG findings at screening (week -6) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) Abnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Screening in Fundus Photography/Fundoscopy
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are fundus photography/fundoscopy (for both left and right eye) findings at screening (week -6) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: 1) Normal. 2) AAbnormal (not clinically significant [NCS]). 3) Abnormal (clinically significant [CS]). The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Haematology: Haemoglobin
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Haematology: Haematocrit
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Haematology: Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Haematology: Thrombocytes
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in thrombocytes was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Haematology: Leucocytes
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in leucocytes was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Total Protein
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in total protein was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Creatinine
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in creatinine was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in ALT was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in AST was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in ALP was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Sodium
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in sodium was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Potassium
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in potassium was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Albumin
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in bilirubin was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis: Albumin/Creatine Ratio
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin/creatine ratio was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis: Erythrocytes
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are urine erythrocytes-test findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: a) Negative, b) Trace, c) 1+, d) 2+ and e) 3+. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis: Protein
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are urine protein-test findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: a) Negative, b) Trace, c) 1+, d) 2+ e) 3+ and f) 4+. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Urinalysis: Ketones
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Reported results are urine ketone-test findings at baseline (week 0) and after 16 weeks of randomisation. The findings are presented as: a) Negative, b) Trace, c) 1+, d) 2+ e) 3+ and f) 4+. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Change from baseline (week 0) in BMI was evaluated after 16 weeks of randomisation. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0, week 16
Number of Change-of-infusion-sets Per Week
Time Frame: Week 0-16
Number of change-of-infusion-sets per week was evaluated from week 0 to week 16. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.
Week 0-16
Number of Subjects With at Least One Non-routine Change-of-infusion-sets Categorised by Reasons for Change-of-infusion-sets
Time Frame: Week 0-16

Number of subjects with at least one non-routine change-of-infusion-sets categorised by reasons for change-of-infusion-sets was evaluated from week 0 to week 16. The results are based on the last on-treatment value, which included the last available measurement in the on-treatment period.

Reasons for change-of-infusion-sets are categorised as follows:

Category-1: A perceived occlusion by the subject Category-2: Any problems related to the infusion set Category-3: Any technical issues with the pump Category-4: Changes in the insulin solution in the infusion set or reservoir Category-5: High BG with no other explanation which made the subject change the infusion set Category-6: Infusion site reaction Category-7: Missing

Week 0-16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Faster-acting insulin aspart

3
Subscribe