Predictive Nature of Total Cholesterol Threshold: Possible Link to Suicidal Behavior

July 25, 2016 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier
Suicidal behavior (SB) is a public health problem. The clinical model currently admitted to the understanding of SB is a stress vulnerability model, but so far, all scientific works has no clinical application. The management of psychiatric patients, including depressed subjects, faces the inability to detect those with a high risk of SB. Many studies have shown a link between low cholesterol and SB. A study has recently proposed a total cholesterol threshold below which the risk of suicide could be increased. However, a prospective study is needed to assess the predictive nature of such an indicator.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Investigators propose to assess, within a cohort of patients, the predictive value of a total cholesterol threshold in the occurrence of SB.

555 inpatients suffering from a current Major depressive disorder (MDD), hospitalized in the Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Post Acute Care will be recruited.

Each patient will attend a total of 5 visits during a follow-up period of 18 months (visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

555

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Montpelleir University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Major
  • Meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM) criteria for a major depressive episode
  • Subject who signed the non-opposition form
  • Able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study
  • Able to understand and perform the clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subject whose primary psychiatric diagnosis is not a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV criteria (the existence of psychiatric comorbidity is not a criterion for non-inclusion)
  • Refusal of participation
  • Subject Deprived of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision)
  • Subject protected by law (guardianship)
  • Subject exclusion period in relation to another protocol
  • Subject for which the maximum annual amount of allowances of € 4,500 has been reached
  • Subject not affiliated to a social security scheme or not being the beneficiary of such a scheme.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Major depressive episode
Depressive patients will be assessed by interview (psychiatrists), questionnaires and blood sampling, as the inpatients's routine care
Interview by psychiatrists, questionnaires, blood analysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
frequency of suicide attempts
Time Frame: at 18 month
frequency of suicide attempts during the 18months follow-up, according to the total cholesterol threshold at baseline. The biological sampling is carried out after 12 hours of fasting.
at 18 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of past SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between the number of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
moral pain
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between moral pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
physical pain
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between physical pain (assessed Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
suicidal ideation
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between suicidal ideation (assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, the Scale of Suicidal Ideation) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
depression (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
history of childhood abuse
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between an history of childhood abuse (assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
National Adult Reading Test score
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between NART score (assessment of intellectual level) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to California Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to California Verbal Learning Test (assessment of verbal memory) and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to Iowa Gambling Task Time frame: 18 months
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to the Iowa Gambling Task (assessment of decision making) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
score to the brixton test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the brixton test (assessment of mental flexibility) and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to verbal fluency
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to verbal fluency and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to Reversal Learning Task
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to Reversal learning task (assessment of decision making) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to the Attentional Stroop test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to Attentional Stroop test and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between inflammatory markers and the occurrence of SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between inflammatory markers at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-
at 18 month
relation between thyroid function and the occurrence of SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between thyroid function at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between lipid profile and the occurrence of SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between lipid profile at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between pharmacological assays and the occurrence of SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between pharmacological assays at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between the characteristic of the mood depressive disorder (unipolar or bipolar depression) and the predictive or vulnerability factors of SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the potential specificity of predictive or vulnerability factors of SB depending on whether the diagnosis is unipolar or bipolar depression
at 18 month
the characteristic of past SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between the number and the lethality of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form, the Risk Rescue Rating Scale, the Suicidal Intent Scale ) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
moral pain
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between moral pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
physical pain
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between physical pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
suicidal ideation
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between suicidal ideation (assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, the Scale of Suicidal Ideation) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
depression level (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
history of childhood abuse
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between an history of childhood abuse (assessed by the childhood trauma questionnaire) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
National Adult Reading Test score ( NART)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between NART score (assessment of intellectual level ) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to California Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to California Verbal Learning Test (assessment of verbal memory) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to Iowa Gambling Task
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to Iowa Gambling Task (assessment of decision making) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
score to the brixton test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the brixton test (assessment of mental flexibility) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
verbal fluency
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to verbal fluency and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to Reversal Learning Task
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to Reversal learning task (assessment of decision making) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
scores to the Attentional Stroop test
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between scores to Attentional Stroop test and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between inflammatory markers and the response to antidepressant treatment
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between inflammatory markers at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between thyroid function and the response to antidepressant treatment
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between thyroid function at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between lipid profile and the response to antidepressant treatment
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between lipid profile at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
relation between pharmacological assays and the response to antidepressant treatment
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between pharmacological assays at baseline and t the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
lethality of past SB
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between the lethality of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
Depression (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
Depression (Beck Depression Inventory)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Beck Depression Inventory and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
depression level (Beck depression Inventory)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Beck depression Inventory and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month
depression level (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)
Time Frame: at 18 month
Studying the relation between score to the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up
at 18 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UF 8921
  • 2011-A01657-34 (Other Identifier: Agence Nationale de Sécurité des Médicaments)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Current Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on patient's routine care

3
Subscribe