Individualized Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (CL-tACS RCT)

May 12, 2026 updated by: Pulvinar Neuro, LLC

Closed-Loop Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (CL-tACS) for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Randomized Pilot Study

The purpose of this research study is to study a closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) device to evaluate feasibility of the product in a clinical trial and collect preliminary data on potential effects on symptoms of depression in people with major depressive disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to investigate device feasibility and performance of the XCSITE 100 Pro V2 device and assess preliminary efficacy of closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (CL-tACS) for reducing symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) in a double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel group, single-site clinical trial. A total of 40 participants will be randomized to receive active or sham CL-tACS via carbon-silicone electrodes for up to 40 minutes over 5 consecutive days. Device feasibility and performance data will be collected from every stimulation session. Clinical assessments of depression and related symptoms will be performed at Baseline (Day 1), End Of Treatment (EOT; Day 5), and Follow-Up (FUP, 2-weeks post-treatment, Day 19). High-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) will be performed at Baseline, EOT and FUP. An optional MRI will be performed up to 30 days before, or on Baseline, to provide anatomical data for EEG brain connectivity analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27516
        • Carolina Center for Neurostimulation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any gender, aged 18 - 70
  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • DSM-5 diagnosis of unipolar, non-psychotic MDD as evidenced by the DIAMOND
  • HDRS-17 score ≥14
  • Low suicide risk (defined for this study as no active suicidal ideation in the past month and no suicide attempts, preparatory actions, or significant non-suicidal self-harm in the previous 2 years). Risk will be assessed utilizing the C-SSRS screen and triage version with further exploration of positive responses.
  • Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)
  • For people of childbearing potential: use of highly effective contraception as determined by the Investigator for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) within the last 12 months, as evidenced by the DIAMOND
  • DSM-5 diagnosis of moderate to severe substance use disorder (excluding tobacco) within the last 12 months, as evidenced by the DIAMOND
  • Lifetime history of bipolar disorder, as evidenced by DIAMOND
  • Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, as evidenced by DIAMOND
  • History of autism spectrum disorder
  • Initiated any new psychotropic medication in the 6 weeks prior to screening or had a dose change in the preceding 6 weeks
  • Initiated a new course of psychotherapy in the 6 weeks preceding screening
  • Received any neurostimulation treatment in the 6 weeks preceding screening
  • History of seizures (excluding febrile seizures in childhood or Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) induced seizures)
  • Neurological disorders that would increase risk of participation or present a significant confounder in the opinion of the investigator (for example, dementia, history of stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, history of traumatic brain injury with prolonged loss of consciousness, ruptured cerebral aneurysm, previous CNS radiation)
  • Previously failed to respond to ECT or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • Prior brain surgery and/or brain implants
  • Implanted medical device that uses electricity
  • Current pregnancy or lactation
  • Currently enrolled in another clinical trial for depression
  • For the optional MRI session only: Contraindication to MRI according to MRI Screening Form
  • Unstable medical disorder or anything that would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study, in the opinion of the Investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Closed-loop tACS
Closed-loop individual alpha tACS daily for five consecutive days.
Individual alpha tACS
Other Names:
  • CL-tACS
Sham Comparator: Sham Closed-loop tACS
Sham closed-loop individual alpha tACS daily for five consecutive days.
Sham stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correct Assignment by Device of Study Arm
Time Frame: 5 days
Successful assignment by device software to correct study arm for each participant for each session, Day 1 (D1) through Day 5 (D5). Measured as percentage of successful assignments compared to intended programming.
5 days
Accuracy of Device Study Arm Parameters by Device
Time Frame: 5 days
Verification of correct study arm parameters applied by device for each participant for each session, Day 1 (D1) through Day 5 (D5).
5 days
Accuracy of Stimulation Initiation Based on EEG by Device
Time Frame: 5 days
Verification of correct stimulation initiation decisions for each evaluated EEG window by device for each participant for each session, Day 1 (D1) through Day 5 (D5).
5 days
Accuracy of Device Logs Uploaded to Cloud by Device
Time Frame: 5 days
Verification of equivalence between logs stored on local device and corresponding logs uploaded to cloud for each participant for each session, Day 1 (D1) through Day 5 (D5).
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HDRS-17 Change
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in HDRS-17 from two week follow-up (FUP) to D1 between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
21 Days
Change in Alpha Oscillation Power
Time Frame: 5 Days
Change in EEG alpha oscillation power between D1 and D5 between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms.
5 Days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Alpha Oscillation Power and Connectivity
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in HD-EEG alpha oscillation power and connectivity at D1, D5, and FUP between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms.
21 Days
Remission Rate
Time Frame: 21 Days
Difference in remission rates between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms at FUP. Remission defined as HDRS-17 score of less than or equal to 7.
21 Days
Response Rate
Time Frame: 21 Days
Difference in response rates between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms at FUP. Response defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in HDRS-17 score from D1 to FUP.
21 Days
SSRI Effect on HDRS-17 Change
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in HDRS-17 for Experimental study arm from two week follow-up (FUP) to D1 between patients on SSRI medication and patients not on SSRI medication; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
21 Days
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in QIDS from D1 to FUP between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 27. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
21 Days
Change in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in SHAPS from D1 to FUP between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 14. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
21 Days
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, short form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in Q-LES-Q-SF from D1 to FUP between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 14. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
21 Days
Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: 21 Days
Change in CGI from D1 to FUP between Experimental and Sham Comparator study arms; CGI scale contains two scoring components, 1) Severity of Illness (0-7) and 2) Global Improvement (0-7). Higher scores in component 1 indicate worse symptoms while higher numbers in component 2 indicate worse clinical outcomes.
21 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Rubinow, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 22, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 22, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Clinical Trials on Closed-loop tACS

Subscribe