Use of Regional Anesthesia in Hip Arthroscopy

February 14, 2018 updated by: Georgetown University
The purpose of this research is to determine differences in outcomes in patients who do, or do not, receive regional anesthesia (a fascia iliaca block) prior to undergoing hip arthroscopy with labral repair and/or debridement and osteoplasty for hip impingement

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for hip impingement at the investigator's institution often have regional anesthesia (a nerve block) prior to the procedure to help prevent and/or reduce pain following the procedure. The investigators are interested in determining benefits as well as potential adverse effects of utilizing regional anesthesia in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for impingement. To do so, they plan to enroll patients aged 18-50 undergoing hip arthroscopy, and randomize them to one of two groups with one group receiving regional anesthesia pre-operatively and the second control group, that does not. The surgical procedure and the post-operative management will be the same for both groups.

Regional anesthesia prior to orthopaedic procedures has been widely adopted in many fields of orthopaedics. While it is generally considered safe and an excellent adjuvant for pain control, there have been few studies exploring outcomes beyond pain control. In many centers, the use of regional anesthesia in hip arthroscopy is reserved for post-operative management of pain. There are multiple studies indicating that patients receiving regional anesthesia (a fascia iliaca or femoral nerve block) had significantly greater improvements in pain score and even an excellent alternative to routine narcotic medication in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Other orthopaedic procedures, such as knee arthroscopy, utilize similar techniques to achieve post-operative pain control through a femoral-sciatic nerve block.

There have also been studies looking at the utilization of regional anesthesia via lumbar plexus blocks with hip arthroscopy. One study found that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with higher levels of preoperative psychological distress frequently utilized a lumbar plexus block to achieve adequate pain control. Other studies found that lumbar plexus blocks significantly improved pain while in the PACU. While serious complications of lumbar plexus block were rare, minor complications such as falls, persistent paresthesias, and unexpected admissions do occur. At our institution, we do not utilize lumbar plexus blocks for regional anesthesia in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Rather, our standard of care is to have an anesthesiologist perform a single shot fascia iliaca block using ropivicaine while the patient is in the pre-operative holding bay.

To the investigative team's knowledge, there are no studies comparing the difference in pain control, as well as the differences in narcotic requirements in PACU, duration of stay in PACU, reported falls, unplanned admissions and/or readmissions, Harris hip score and nerve pain/paresthesias/numbness in patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy with and without regional anesthesia. A better understanding of pain and functional outcomes following hip arthroscopy with and without regional anesthesia can help providers better assess circumstances when regional anesthesia can be beneficial or detrimental to a patient's post-operative course.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Recruiting
        • Georgetown University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for arthroscopic labral repair with or without osteoplasty of the hip.
  • 18 to 50 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) score of I or II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or planned pregnancy
  • History of neuropathic pain, chronic pain syndrome, or preoperative use of narcotic or neuropathic pain medicine
  • Radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (> Tonis grade 1)
  • Inability to attend follow up visits
  • Documented allergy to local anesthetic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Iliac Fascia Block (Ropivacaine)
These patients will receive a preoperative iliac fascia block performed as a single shot in the standard fashion prior to hip arthroscopy with general anesthesia.
Iliac fascia block was performed in the experimental group with a single shot of Ropavicaine.
Other Names:
  • Iliac Fascia Block
Patients were induced and maintained in a fashion consistent with standard practices.
Sham Comparator: Control (Normal Saline Sham Injection)
These patients will receive a preoperative sham block of normal saline in the same fashion as a standard singl shot iliac fascia block prior to hip arthroscopy with general anesthesia.
Patients were induced and maintained in a fashion consistent with standard practices.
Sham block using normal saline instead of iliac fascia block but otherwise employing the equivalent technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Medication Requirement in PACU
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
Measured in morphine equivalents
24 hours post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Falls
Time Frame: 6 weeks
patient reported
6 weeks
Readmissions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
patient reported and through chart review
6 weeks
Neuropathic Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 6 weeks
Self Reported- Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaires will be completed at both 2 and 6 week follow-up
2 weeks and 6 weeks
Time to Physical Therapy
Time Frame: 6 weeks
patient reported
6 weeks
Duration of PACU stay (mins)
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
time from PACU admission to discharge
24 hours post-operatively
Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 hours post-operatively
patient reported
24 hours post-operatively
Long Term Pain Control (daily VAS record)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patients will complete a daily VAS questionnaire at home
6 weeks
Long Term Medication Requirements (daily log of medication usage in tablets of 5 mg oxycodone, morphine extended relief 15 mg, and/or indomethacin 75 mg)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patients will complete a daily medication log at home
6 weeks
Modified Harris hip score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Questionnaire administered at 6 week follow up to evaluate functional outcomes
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blake Bodendorfer, MD, Georgetown University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Injuries

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Subscribe