Feasibility Study of Breast MRI in Decubitus Position (EFIMED)

August 7, 2018 updated by: Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Breast MRI is performed in prone position which causes a number of questions. Indeed, the correlation with mammography and echography and the identification of preoperative lesions can be complex as echography and surgery are carried in supine position while mammography is performed in standing position.

Moreover, the prone position is often considered as uncomfortable by the patients. However, there is few publications in the literature on breast MRI in decubitus position.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54500
        • Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient to benefit a MRI in the assessment for a breast carcinoma or a suspicious of breast carcinoma
  • Assessment on 3.0 Tesla in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Age >18 years old
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 3
  • Ability to provide written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Claustrophobia
  • Contraindication to the injection of contrast medium Gadoline
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under supervision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Supine position
3.0 tesla MRI in supine position

Eligible patients will have a standard MRI in prone position. At the end of this examination, all patients will have an other standard MRI in supine position.

This examination is then extended by 10 minutes without additional injection of contrast medium

Active Comparator: Prone position
3.0 tesla MRI in prone position

Eligible patients will have a standard MRI in prone position. At the end of this examination, all patients will have an other standard MRI in supine position.

This examination is then extended by 10 minutes without additional injection of contrast medium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of lesions where the topography is discordant between the positions (prone and supine).
Time Frame: 1 day
The topography is considered discordant if the location of the lesion is different between prone and supine positions (location will be described as the positions on a clock) and / or the distance from the nipple to the lesion is greater than 2cm between prone and supine positions.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comfort patient in supine position compared to the prone position using a self-administered questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
distance from the anterior border of the lesion to the nipple in supine position compared to the prone position
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
distance from cutaneous projection of the lesion to the nipple in supine position compared to the prone position
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
distance from lesion to pectoralis major muscle in supine position compared to the prone position
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day
Quandrant of the lesions and positions on a clock in supine position compared to the prone position
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: OLDRINI Guillaume, MD, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Position for the 3.0 Tesla in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

3
Subscribe