- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02865889
Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
Laparoscopic surgery is gaining currency in the field of oncologic care, particularly for colorectal and gynecologic cancers. This innovation could be used either for staging purpose and therefore could steer global therapeutic options or for surgical management only.
Increase knowledge and skills lead to an increase in the number and rate of the women this innovation could be offered. The project team observed a shift from traditional surgical management (abdominal radical surgery) towards laparoscopic with a focus on lymphadenectomy.
This innovation however increases some costs (the surgical stage) but decrease some others (the post surgical stage).
Foreseeing the pace of the dissemination needs to have objective and reliable data about who had access to laparoscopic surgery and who didn't (and why) and accurate assessment of related costs.
This program will focus on uterine cancer (both cervix and corpus).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Bouches-du Rhône
-
Marseille, Bouches-du Rhône, France, 13009
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age>18 years
- Endometrial or cervical cancer
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Uterine oncologic Indications for surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The following costs were included:Equipment costs,Instrument costs,Operating room costs,Hospital stay
|
2 years
|
|
Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures (Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures will take into account conversion rate, complications rate, metastatic and pelvic relapse
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eric Lambaudie, MD,PhD, Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STIC COELCO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.