Outpatient PDD Guided Laser Mediated Destruction of Bladder Tumors (LaserIII)

October 31, 2017 updated by: Gregers Gautier Hermann, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Is Outpatient PDD Guided Laser Mediated Destruction of Bladder Tumors (LMD-BT) as Good as Conventional Inpatient PDD Guided Transurethral Tumor Resection in Patients With Low Grade Non-invasive (Ta) Bladder Tumors?

This study compare the efficacy of conventional photodynamic (PDD) guided transurethral bladder tumor resection in the operating theatre with outpatient PDD guided laser destruction of bladder tumors through flexible cystoscopes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective randomized two-part clinical trial comprising patients with recurrent pTa low grade bladder tumors.

Study objectives and purpose:

  • 1st Objective: To evaluate whether small pTa bladder tumours can be removed with diode laser in an outpatient department with similar efficacy as by TUR-BT resection in the operating theatre.
  • 2nd Objective: To evaluate the patients experience of symptoms during laser treatment in the outpatient department (OPD) using quality of life (QOL) questionnaires (symptom evaluation) and Visual Analog Scale Score (pain evaluation).
  • 3rd Objective: To evaluate whether patients prefer standard transurethral bladder tumor resection (TUR-BT) in the operating theatre (OT) or laser treatment in the OPD.
  • 4th Objective: To evaluate the safety after laser treatment in the OPD.

Efficacy:

  • 1st Endpoint: Proportion of patients with no tumor tissue in the bladder after 4 months and 12 months.
  • 2nd Endpoint: Visual Analog Scale Score (pain evaluation) in patients having tumor removed by laser in the OPD.

General urinary problems and QOL one week after the laser treatment. The Danish validated questionnaire (QLQ- BLS24) from EORTC will be used.

  • 3rd Endpoint: Patients preference for either OPD laser treatment procedure or TUR-BT in the OT as inpatient procedure.
  • 4th Endpoint: Character and severity of adverse events in relation to the outpatient treatment.

Study

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Ta low grade bladder tumor recurrences
  2. Up to a tumor size of 1,5 cm
  3. Up to 6 tumors
  4. Eligible patients for TUR-BT

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with porphyria
  2. Known hypersensitivity to Hexvix® or porfhyrins
  3. Use of concomitant anticoagulants as Marevan, Marcoumar, and Pradaxa
  4. Dementia
  5. Macroscopic hematuria
  6. Pregnant or breast feeding women
  7. Expected poor compliance estimated by the investigators
  8. Patients < 18 years
  9. Patients who do not read or understand Danish

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

248

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ta low grade bladder tumor recurrences
  2. Up to a tumor size of 1,5 cm
  3. Up to 6 tumors
  4. Eligible patients for TUR-BT in GA

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with porphyria
  2. Known hypersensitivity to Hexvix® or porfhyrins
  3. Use of concomitant anticoagulants as Marevan, Marcoumar, and Pradaxa
  4. Dementia
  5. Macroscopic hematuria
  6. Pregnant or breast feeding women
  7. Expected poor compliance estimated by the investigators
  8. Patients < 18 years
  9. Patients who do not read or understand Danish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Inpatient TUR-BT
Transurethral bladder tumor resection in operating theatre as inpatient.
Conventional bladder tumor resection using diathermia
Experimental: laser bladder tumor destruction
Outpatient laser mediated destruction of bladder tumors (LMD-BT)
Laser mediated destruction of bladder tumors (LMD-BT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor recurrence histological identified in biopsy obtained during cystoscopy
Time Frame: 4 months
Numbers (%) of patients vith histological proven recurrence of bladder tumor after 4 months
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower urinary symptoms caused by laser treatment.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Using the EORTC questionnaire QLQ-BLS24 the extent of symptoms are given on a unique score from 0-100, with 0 being no symptoms and 100 are worst symptoms. Mean and range score in the two arms will be compared statistically.
2 weeks
Side effects to laser treatment.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Symptoms measured by one unique score according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Mean and range score in the two arms will be compared statistically.
2 weeks
Pain during laser treatment
Time Frame: Evaluated immediately after laser treatment
The patients record pain on a visual analogue scale of 0-10. Zero corresponds to no pain. Ten correspond to the worst possible pain.
Evaluated immediately after laser treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregers G Hermann, DM Sc, Department of Urology, Frederiksberg hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Bladder tumor resection using diathermia

3
Subscribe