Non-invasive Fluid Management (DECAF)

April 4, 2019 updated by: Michael Lanspa, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Non-invasive Fluid Management in Critically Ill Patients With ARDS

For patients with a condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), managing their fluid levels to achieve a negative balance helps to improve their outcomes. In the past, patients' fluid levels were monitored with central lines placed into the bloodstream. However, most patients are now managed without central lines. A device called a NICOM (noninvasive cardiac output monitor) which monitors patients' heart function, using a few patches which are attached to their chest, may be useful in managing fluid levels without central lines. This study will compare the fluid balance in patients who are managed with typical care to the fluid balance in patients who are managed with the NICOM device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Negative fluid balance in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been shown to improve intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and ventilator-free days. Although protocols exist for fluid management, all require invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Despite the large evidence base supporting the use of invasive monitoring, the majority of ARDS patients are now managed without invasive central lines. A non-invasive protocol for managing fluid status in patients with ARDS has not been rigorously implemented nor studied within a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE:

The study objective is to compare a novel non-invasive parameter-guided protocol for fluid management to usual care. The specific aims are: 1) to compare the incidence of new or worsening renal failure, the incidence of new or worsening shock, and the incidence of new or worsening non-shock hypotension; 2) to compare the relative effectiveness of the 2 treatment groups as assessed by cumulative fluid balance over 7 days; 3) to determine if the non-invasive protocol increases the number of ventilator-free days and ICU-free days; and further, to evaluate if it decreases 60-day mortality; and 4) to document the clinical instances where treatment digression between the 2 groups occurs.

STUDY DESIGN:

This study is a single-blinded, randomized control trial, comparing 1 treatment arm to usual care. We will treat patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (including ARDS) for 7 consecutive days. Their post-study course will be monitored for a period of 60 days or until death. Patients who are randomized to the intervention group will receive fluid management strategies that are dictated by non-invasively derived (via the "NICOM" device) surrogates of cardiac preload and output. Patients who are randomized to the control group will receive standard-of-care "best practice" fluid management, as dictated by the treating physician.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Recruiting
        • Intermountain Medical Center
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ithan Peltan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ellie Hirshberg, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sarah Beesley, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Samuel Brown, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Colin Grissom, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anthony Edwards, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • ≥18 years of age
  • Acute respiratory failure (must meet ONE of the following)

    • Receipt of mechanical ventilation
    • Receipt of non-invasive ventilation via BIPAP or CPAP, used for an indication other than sleep apnea
    • Receipt of high flow nasal cannula oxygenation with FiO2 > .4 and a flow rate > 30 LPM
  • Increased total body fluid volume (any of the following)

    • > 1 kg increased weight gain (compared to admission)
    • > 1 L positive fluid balance (compared to admission)
    • Bedside clinician determination

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known pregnancy (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential)
  • Dialysis dependence, at the time of enrollment
  • Chronic ventilator dependence, prior to admission
  • Intubation for airway protection (solely for a surgical procedure) or upper airway obstruction
  • Neuromuscular disease that impairs the ability to ventilate spontaneously, such as C5 or higher spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, and myasthenia gravis
  • Solid organ transplantation or bone marrow transplantation
  • Vasculitis with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
  • Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh Score 10-15)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm will be treated almost the same as if they do not enroll in the study. They will be managed in accordance with best ICU (intensive care unit) practices, with treatment decisions made by the treating team. Often this will include blood draws (often 2 teaspoons once or twice per day, but sometimes exceeding this), assessments of cardiac function, assessments of fluid status, and other measures as dictated by the presenting illness (this is broad and will include antibiotics, diuretics, cardiac medications, ventilator and oxygen management, etc.). Patients in the usual care arm will not have diuresis managed by NICOM.
Experimental: NICOM-Guided Diuresis

Within 4 hours, patients will have their blood pressure obtained, a NICOM-based assessment of PLR (passive leg raise)-induced change in cardiac index, hourly urinary output, and quantization of the total input and output from the beginning of the morning shift (7 am). This will allow determination of the fluid goal over the next 4 hours. Patients will receive furosemide to achieve the goal fluid balance, if needed as described in the accompanying protocol. Monitoring of electrolytes and renal function will be at the discretion of the treating physician.

Following the initial evaluation, at set times spaced every 4 hours apart, patients will have an ongoing evaluation of the day's fluid balance, hourly urinary output, and PLR/NICOM values. This diuresis protocol will continue for a total of seven 24-hour periods or until the primary means of oxygenation/ventilation has been withdrawn, whichever occurs first. Patients will be followed for a total of 60 days to evaluate outcome data.

NICOM-based assessment of PLR-induced change in cardiac index

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite incidence of new acute kidney injury (AKI), new hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure < 60 following diuresis), and new shock (SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score)
Time Frame: Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU
Primary predictor is diuresis treatment protocol arm
Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU
7-day cumulative fluid balance
Time Frame: Days 1 to 7
Primary predictor is diuresis treatment protocol arm
Days 1 to 7
Correlation of non-invasive NICOM derived cardiac parameters with incidence of new acute kidney injury (AKI), new hypotension, and new shock
Time Frame: Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU
Primary predictor is NICOM-derived percent (%) change in stroke volume index
Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of new kidney injury
Time Frame: Days 1-7
New kidney injury is defined by an increase in serum creatinine, adjusted for a fluid balance of 50%, or an absolute increase in serum creatinine of more than 0.3-mg/dL over a 48-hour window during study days 1-7
Days 1-7
Ventilator-free days to day 28 (days alive and free from mechanical ventilation)
Time Frame: Admission to ICU to day 28 after admission to ICU
Admission to ICU to day 28 after admission to ICU
ICU-free days to day 28 (days alive and out of the ICU)
Time Frame: Admission to ICU to day 28 after admission to ICU
Admission to ICU to day 28 after admission to ICU
60-day mortality
Time Frame: Admission to ICU to 60 days after admission to ICU
Admission to ICU to 60 days after admission to ICU
Incidence of new shock between the treatment arms (NICOM-guided diuresis, usual care)
Time Frame: Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU
Admission to ICU through discharge from ICU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

Subscribe