- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02907060
Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for Women With PrOlongedPregnancies
Propess® Versus Double Balloon for Cervical Ripening of Prolonged Pregnancies: a Randomised Controlled Trial
A pregnancy is considered ''prolonged'' from 41 weeks of gestation. Prolonged Pregnancies (PP) are associated with increased maternal morbidity: emergency caesarean, 3rd and 4th degree perineal lesions and postpartum haemorrhage. Foetuses are at increased risk of oligohydramnios, meconium-staining and Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) anomalies. Around 15% of all pregnancies are prolonged.
A Cochrane review on induction of labour showed that a policy of labour induction at or beyond 41 weeks was associated with significantly fewer perinatal deaths. Thus the French College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists stated, "induction of labour can be proposed to patients between 41+0 and 41+6 weeks of gestation". In cases where labour is induced and cervix is unfavourable, cervical ripening is advised. Methods of cervical ripening include pharmacological (prostaglandins) and mechanical (Foley catheter or trans-cervical double balloon) methods. Those two methods were compared in the PROBAAT trial among women with term pregnancies (beyond 37+0). The rates of caesarean section with these two strategies were identical, however uterine hyper stimulation with FHR anomalies occurred less when cervical ripening was mechanical.
Considering pharmacological cervical ripening is associated with more uterine hyper stimulation and more FHR anomalies, it may not be the most appropriate in cases of fragile foetuses that include cases of prolonged pregnancies. Considering prolonged pregnancies are associated with a risk of FHR anomalies and that cervical ripening with a pharmacological method is another factor which increases this risk: women with prolonged pregnancies could benefit from a more "gentle" cervical ripening.
At present, no particular method is recommended in cases of cervical ripening and prolonged pregnancies. We hypothesise that, in cases of prolonged pregnancies, mechanical cervical ripening, with less uterine hyperstimulation and fewer FHR anomalies, could be more appropriate and could reduce the rate of caesarean section for suspicion of fetal distress.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brest, France
- CHU Brest
-
Caen, France, 14033
- CHU Caen
-
Cergy Pontoise, France, 95303
- CH Pontoise
-
Chartres, France
- CH Chartres
-
Clermont-ferrand, France, 63001
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand
-
La Roche Sur Yon, France, 85925
- CH Départemental Vendée
-
Marseille, France, 13008
- Hôpital Saint Joseph
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- CHU Nantes
-
Poissy, France
- CHI Poissy
-
Reims, France, 51092
- CHU Reims
-
Rennes, France
- CHU Rennes
-
Saint-priest En Jarez, France, 42270
- CHU Saint Etienne
-
Toulouse, France
- CHU Toulouse
-
Tours, France, 37044
- CHRU Tours
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women
- ≥ 18 years old
- With a singleton cephalic pregnancy between ≥41+0 weeks and ≤ 42+0 weeks of gestation
- Gestational age estimated from the first trimester ultrasound (realized between 11 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- With a decision of induction of labour
- Written informed consent obtained from subject
- Subject covered by or having the rights to the French Social Security system
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bishop score ≥ 6 (favourable cervix)
- Non cephalic presentation (breech, transverse)
Severe preeclampsia defined as the presence of preeclampsia with at least one of the following items :
- Severe maternal hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg)
- Renal failure with oliguria (< 500 ml/24h) or creatinine > 135μmol/L, or proteinuria > 5 g/day
- Pulmonary oedema, epigastric pain or HELLP syndrom (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, low platelets)
- Eclampsia or neurologic persisting symptoms (visual disturbances, headache, increased reflexes)
- Thrombopenia < 100 G/L
- Prior caesarean section or uterine scar
- Placenta praevia
- Suspected genital herpes infection
- Known VIH seropositivity (confirmed by blood serology)
- Premature rupture of membranes (PROM - continual leaking of amniotic fluid or positive test in favour of PROM)
- Foetus with suspected severe congenital abnormalities
- Pathological fetal heart rate
- Contra-indications to Propess®
- Contra-indications for using Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon
- Women under guardianship or trusteeship
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Mechanical cervical ripening
mechanical cervical ripening with a Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon
|
The mechanical cervical ripening is a double transcervical balloon. The device used in the study is the Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon with CE marked (commercialized by the Cook® laboratory, ref JCRBS-184000). It is a silicone double balloon catheter. Maximum balloon inflation is 80 mL/balloon. It will be used in accordance with user manual |
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pharmacological cervical ripening
pharmacological cervical ripening with a 10mg slow releasing system of Dinoprostone (Propess®)
|
The comparative pharmacological procedure is a vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone. The form used in the study is Propess (Ferring pharmaceuticals) containing 10mg of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). It will be used in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Caesarean section rate for non-reassuring fetal status.
Time Frame: Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Indication of the caesarean section will be settled by an adjudication committee at the end of the study
|
Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time between cervical ripening and delivery in hours
Time Frame: Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Evaluation of time between cervical ripening and delivery in hours
|
Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Delivery rate after 12 and 24 hours of cervical ripening
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Evaluation of delivery rate after 12 and 24 hours of cervical ripening
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Induction with oxytocin
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
yes/no
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Total dose of oxytocin required for induction of labour
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
evaluation of total dose of oxytocin required for induction of labour
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Uterine hyper stimulation defined as more than 6 contractions by 10 minutes over a 30 minutes period
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
uterine hyperstimulation
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Requirement for tocolysis during cervical ripening or during labour
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
requirement for tocolysis
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Suspicious or pathological fetal heart rate
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
FIGO classification
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Uterine rupture
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
yes/no
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Use of analgesics during labour
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
yes/no
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Use of antibiotics during labour
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
yes/no
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Indication for caesarean delivery other than non-reassuring FHR
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
(failure to progress in first or second stage of labour or maternal indication)
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Type of vaginal delivery
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
spontaneous or instrumental, indication for instrumental delivery
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Maternal intra partum infection
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Suspicion of maternal intra partum infection
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Maternal post partum infection
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Suspicion of post partum infection
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Maternal post partum haemorrhage
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Post partum haemorrhage defined as estimated blood loss > 500 cc
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Maternal blood transfusion
Time Frame: up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Blood transfusion
|
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
|
Neonatal apgar score
Time Frame: at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after delivery
|
Apgar score at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes
|
at 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after delivery
|
Neonatal arterial ph
Time Frame: at delivery
|
Arterial pH at delivery
|
at delivery
|
Intensive care unit for newborn
Time Frame: up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Admission in an intensive care unit
|
up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Neonatal respiratory insufficiency
Time Frame: up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Respiratory insufficiency with necessity of any respiratory support
|
up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Birth asphyxia
Time Frame: up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Birth asphyxia defined as pH<7, Base Excess >12 mmol/l and encephalopathy.
|
up to 5 days after cervical ripening
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Diguisto C, Le Gouge A, Arthuis C, Winer N, Parant O, Poncelet C, Chauleur C, Hannigsberg J, Ducarme G, Gallot D, Gabriel R, Desbriere R, Beucher G, Faraguet C, Isly H, Rozenberg P, Giraudeau B, Perrotin F; Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie (GROG). Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021 Feb 11;18(2):e1003448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003448. eCollection 2021 Feb.
- Diguisto C, Le Gouge A, Giraudeau B, Perrotin F. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 14;7(9):e016069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016069.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MAGPOP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prolonged Pregnancy
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedProlonged PregnancyFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedProlonged Pregnancy | NulliparityFrance
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Turku University HospitalUniversity of TurkuCompleted
-
Université de SherbrookeFonds de la Recherche en Santé du QuébecUnknownObstetric Labor Complications | Prolonged PregnancyCanada
-
University Hospital, LilleTerminatedProlonged Pregnancy | Induction of LabourFrance
-
University of JohannesburgCompletedFetal Congenital Abnormalities | Prolonged Pregnancy | Multiple PregnancySouth Africa
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknownPregnancy, Prolonged
-
Benha UniversityRecruiting
-
National University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandHealth Research Board, IrelandUnknownPregnancy Related | Pregnancy, Prolonged | Induced; Birth
Clinical Trials on Mechanical cervical ripening
-
Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training...CompletedCervical Ripening | Pregnancy, High-RiskTurkey
-
Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training...Unknown
-
University of WashingtonCompletedPre-induction Cervical Ripening
-
MemorialCare Health SystemActive, not recruitingPatient Satisfaction | Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn | Cervical RipeningUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompleted
-
National University of MalaysiaCompleted
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonActive, not recruitingInduced Vaginal DeliveryUnited States
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonMedicem International CR s.r.o.CompletedLabor, Induced | Cervix Uteri-DiseasesUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusNot yet recruitingInduction of Labor
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompleted