- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04342741
Inpatient and Outpatient Balloon Catheter Cervical Ripening
April 9, 2020 updated by: Rahana Abd Rahman, National University of Malaysia
A Comparison Between Inpatient and Outpatient Balloon Catheter Cervical Ripening: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomised controlled trial comparing cervical ripening using foley catheter as in- or outpatient setting.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of outpatient versus inpatient Foley catheter cervical ripening and patients' satisfaction.
Sixty low-risk women were randomized to outpatient and inpatient management of intracervical Foley catheter digital insertion.
The outpatient group was provided with verbal and written 24-hours contact information and instructions.
Both groups were reassessed the next morning unless labor had begun or the catheter had dropped off.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Kuala Lumpur
-
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 56000
- UKM Medical Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- singleton
- gestational age beyond 37 weeks
- cephalic presentation
- intact membranes
- Bishop score less than 6
- lives within 10km from National University Malaysia Medical Centre or able to reach within 30 minutes
- readily available transport
Exclusion Criteria:
- intrauterine death
- intrauterine fetal growth restriction
- estimated fetal weight more than 4000gram
- fetal anomalies
- abnormal pre-induction cardiotocograph
- non-vertex presentation
- unstable lie
- sepsis
- hypertension
- allergy to latex
- previous uterine scar
- history of antepartum haemorrhage
- parity of 6 and more
- placenta praevia
- suspected cephalopelvic disproportion
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Foley catheter inpatient
Participants had intracervical ripening with foley catheter after admission into the ward.
|
Participants were assessed when labour was established or the following morning.
|
|
Active Comparator: Foley catheter outpatient
Participants had intracervical ripening with foley catheter and allowed home.
|
Participants were assessed when labour was established or the following morning.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Caesarean section rate
Time Frame: From the time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of Caesarean section
|
From the time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Neonatal sepsis
Time Frame: From birth up to 30 days
|
Percentage of neonates with sepsis
|
From birth up to 30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maternal age
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Mean maternal age in years
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Ethnicity
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of each races
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Education level
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of participants with secondary or higher education level
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Occupation
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of participants who were professional or non professional or housewives
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Mean pre-pregnancy body mass index in kg/m2
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Parity
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of participants who are nulliparous or multiparous
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Gestation at recruitment
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of participants who were recruited at 40 or 40 weeks and 10 days
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Indication
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment
|
Percentage of participants who were induced based on indication
|
At the time of recruitment
|
|
Bishop score pre-induction
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
|
Mean Bishop score prior to induction.
Unfavourable score has minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 5.
|
Pre-intervention
|
|
Bishop score at second assessment
Time Frame: From insertion of Foley catheter until labour established or the following morning
|
Mean Bishop score at second assessment.
Unfavourable score has minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 5.
|
From insertion of Foley catheter until labour established or the following morning
|
|
Management at second assessment
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who had dinoprostone insertion or artificial rupture of membranes
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration from induction until favourable Bishop score
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Mean duration taken from induction until favourable Bishop score in hours
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Augmentation with oxytocin
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who required oxytocin augmentation
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration of oxytocin use
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Mean duration of oxytocin use in minutes
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration from amniotomy until delivery
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Mean duration from amniotomy until delivery in hours
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration from induction until delivery
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Mean duration from induction until delivery in hours
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Delivery within 24 hours
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who delivered within 24 hours from induction
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration of inpatient stay
Time Frame: At time of recruitment until delivery
|
Mean duration of inpatient stay in hours
|
At time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Total blood loss
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Median blood loss in millilitres
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Intrapartum pyrexia
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Percentage of participants with intrapartum pyrexia
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Primary postpartum haemorrhage
Time Frame: Immediately at delivery up to 42 days
|
Percentage of participants with primary postpartum haemorrhage
|
Immediately at delivery up to 42 days
|
|
Birth weight
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Mean birth weight in grams
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Arterial cord blood acidity or alkalinity
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Mean arterial cord blood acidity or alkalinity
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Neonatal white cell count
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Mean neonatal white cell count in liter
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Neonatal C-reactive protein
Time Frame: At the time of delivery
|
Median neonatal C-reactive protein in milligram per liter
|
At the time of delivery
|
|
Discomfort with foley catheter
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
Percentage of participants experienced discomfort with foley catheter
|
At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
|
Ability to cope with discomfort
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
Percentage of participants able to cope with discomfort
|
At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
|
Intention to use the method again
Time Frame: Through study completion until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who intend to use similar method in future
|
Through study completion until delivery
|
|
Feeling alone during induction
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who felt lonely during induction
|
At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Duration of sleep
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
Duration of sleep during induction in hours
|
At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Able to rest and relax
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
Percentage of participants who are able to rest and relax
|
At the time of recruitment until delivery
|
|
Feeling of unsafe during cervical ripening
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
Percentage of participants who felt unsafe during cervical ripening
|
At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
|
Embarrassed by the method
Time Frame: At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
Percentage of participants who felt embarrassed by the method
|
At the time of recruitment until active phase of labour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2020
Last Verified
April 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FF-2017-358
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caesarean Section; Infection
-
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompletedCaesarean Section | Caesarean Section; InfectionUnited Kingdom
-
Ashulia Women and Children HospitalCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedCaesarean SectionEgypt
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalCompletedCaesarean SectionTaiwan
-
Sichuan Provincial People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalUnknownCaesarean SectionChina
-
Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey UniversityRecruitingCaesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Büşra KüçüktürkmenNot yet recruiting
-
Maimonides Medical CenterTerminatedCaesarean SectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Foley catheter cervical ripening
-
MemorialCare Health SystemCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn | Cervical RipeningUnited States
-
Western Galilee Hospital-NahariyaNot yet recruitingInduction of Labor | Cervical Ripening
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCompletedInduced Vaginal DeliveryUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedPregnancy RelatedUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalCompletedInduction of BirthNorway
-
University of PennsylvaniaRecruitingLabor Induction | Cesarean DeliveryUnited States
-
Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training...Completed
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompleted
-
EgymedicalpediaNot yet recruitingInduction of Labor | Post DateEgypt
-
University of LiverpoolGynuity Health Projects; Daga Memorial Women's Hospital, Nagpur, India; Government...CompletedPre-eclampsia | Fetus or Newborn; Effects of Induction of LaborIndia