Use of a High Density Mapping System to Complete Wide Area Circumferential Ablation of the Pulmonary Veins and Avoid Ostial Segmental Ablation (HD-WACA)

October 4, 2019 updated by: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized single blind, parallel group study to be conducted in the UK (2 sites).Approximately 48 patients will be recruited aiming for 40 eligible for randomization. The study is designed to compare the operator's best attempt at WACA completion with and without Rhythmia guidance

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia occurring in 1-2% of the general population. AF can be associated with debilitating symptoms and confers an increased risk of death, stroke, heart failure and hospitalization. As such there is a need for effective therapies for AF. In particularly catheter based therapies, which can limit the need for chronic drug therapy, are becoming more widely accepted.

The development of AF requires both a trigger and susceptible substrate. Ectopic activity originating within the pulmonary veins (PVs) is a widely recognised factor in the genesis of paroxysmal AF, whilst electrical, contractile and structural remodelling of atrial myocardium are each important contributing factors to the arrhythmogenic substrate in AF.

An early strategy in paroxysmal AF (PAF) was to target ectopic triggers coming from the PV via ostial segmental ablation (OSA). Here radiofrequency (RF) ablation was applied close to the PV ostia at sites of early signals, usually until PVs were electrically isolated from the left atrium (LA). This approach resulted in a success rate, with regard to freedom from AF after a single procedure, of 65-90% after 1 year but closer to 50% after 5 years. The recognition of PV stenosis as a complication of RF delivery within a PV, as well as the recognition that initiation sites could be located in the antrum led to a shift in ablation strategy towards wider encirclement of the PVs using wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) using electroanatomical mapping to guide RF delivery. This resulted in improved success rates in a head-to-head comparison with OSA and it is possible that this relates to substrate modification inherent in this approach.

Recurrence of AF remains problematic following ablation. Pulmonary vein reconnection after ablation is thought to contribute to the majority of recurrent episodes of AF in paroxysmal AF. Electrical isolation of the PVs is often not achievable with WACA alone - 95% of patients had residual connections following WACA alone in one study. Most clinicians at this juncture will look for any obvious gaps in the line and ablate if there are early PV signals. If this is unsuccessful then it is often necessary to resort to OSA to achieve PV isolation. In essence a large proportion of PV isolation procedures, which started with a WACA strategy, are in fact a hybrid of WACA and OSA. This both has the potential to increase the complication rate by risking PV stenosis and reducing efficacy through omitting important substrate modification and allowing residual connection of part of the antrum and the LA.

The introduction of Rhythmia, a novel electroanatomical mapping system with the potential to rapidly acquire high density electroanatomical data, may allow an alternative strategy and more efficient targeting of gaps in WACA lines. The pilot data shows that the system is particularly adept in assessing gaps in ablation lines including WACA lines. Mapping and targeting such gaps may hold the key to efficiently completing PV isolation after an initial WACA line is performed.

RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY Research Question: Can ostial segmental ablation be avoided during a wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) by using the Rhythmia high density mapping system? Hypothesis: The current study is designed to test the hypothesis that high density mapping using Rhythmia can enhance the operator's ability to electrically isolate PVs without unnecessary excessive ablation or OSA

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Please Select Region, State Or Province
      • London, Please Select Region, State Or Province, United Kingdom, W120HS
        • Hammersmith Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECG documented AF
  • Listed for AF ablation by referring physician
  • Planned ablation includes a first-time PVI.
  • Patient signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 or >80
  • LA diameter >60mm
  • AF secondary to transient correctible abnormalits (e.g. electrolyte imbalance, thyrotoxicosis, recent infective or inflammatory process)
  • Intra-atrial thrombus or tumour
  • Renal failure requiring haemodialysis
  • Heart failure with NYHA III-IV or EF<35%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A - Standard Care
The operator will attempt to complete the WACA lesion set using standard techniques. These include ablating any obvious gaps in the lesion set, ablating at the WACA line in a location radial to the earliest PV signal measured by the Orion catheter situated within the PV, and guided by amplitude and dV/dt of signals along the WACA lesion set measured using the mapping catheter. If this fails the operator will resort to OSA as per their usual practice.
Procedure involving catheter ablation to produce pulmonary vein isolation. Pulmonary veins are isolated by assessing electrograms circumferentially around the PV using the Orion catheter.
Catheters transiently inserted into body via femoral veins in order to produce pulmonary vein isolation. These catheters are the same in each arm and comprise the Orion catheter (Boston Scientific) and the Tacticath (St Jude) which are used to produce pulmonary vein isolation and which are approved for use in standard EP procedures by the relevant authorities (CE marked). It is merely the protocol by which they are used that iffers in the two arms.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group B - Rhythmia mapping
The operator will form Rhythmia maps focussing on the region of the WACA line surrounding the non-isolated vein(s) whilst pacing from CS. This will be used as a means of targeting RF ablation to gaps in the WACA line (in addition to use of standard observation of signals as per group A). If this fails then the operator will resort to OSA as per their usual practice.
Catheters transiently inserted into body via femoral veins in order to produce pulmonary vein isolation. These catheters are the same in each arm and comprise the Orion catheter (Boston Scientific) and the Tacticath (St Jude) which are used to produce pulmonary vein isolation and which are approved for use in standard EP procedures by the relevant authorities (CE marked). It is merely the protocol by which they are used that iffers in the two arms.
Procedure involving catheter ablation to produce pulmonary vein isolation. Pulmonary veins are isolated by use of electroanatomical mapping with the Orion catheter around the sites ablation in order to target points of breakthrough.
Mapping activation patterns using the Rhythmia system in conjunction with the Orion catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total time in minutes required to produce isolation of veins per WACA
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Following first pass ablation with WACA, if either vein is not isolated the patient will be randomized into group A or B. The total RF time taken to isolate the veins for that WACA will be measured as one of 2 joint primary outcome measures.
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Total number of radiofrequency ablation lesions to produce isolation of veins per WACA
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Following first pass ablation with WACA, if either vein is not isolated the patient will be randomized into group A or B. The total number of lesions (each lesion being 30s in duration) to isolate the veins for that WACA will be measured as one of two joint primary outcome measures.
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whether ostial ablation is required in each case (Yes/No)
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
This is a measure of whether ostial ablation (undesirable) will be required (yes/no). It is assessed during procedure.
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Number of radiofrequency ablation lesions required within the WACA lesion set
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
The number of oostial lesions required in each case (number of ablation lesions)
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Total radiofrequency ablation time (in mins) within the WACA lesion set
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
This is the total ablation time (in mins) within the WACA required to produce PV isolation
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Total number of radiofrequency ablation lesions required to produce PV isolation per patient
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
As per primary endpoint but on a per patient rather than per vein basis
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Total procedural time (in mins) required to produce PV isolation
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Whether procedure time (in mins) is different in group A vs group B
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Percentage of patients with successful PV isolation
Time Frame: Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Proportion of veins successfully isolated with the contrasting techniques
Procedural - i.e. assessed over procedure duration only (about 3 hours)
Percentage of patients suffering symptomatic PV stenosis
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of patients coming back within 3 months with symptomatic PV stenosis
3 months
Percentage of patients with AF recurrence
Time Frame: 3 months
Proportion of patients remaining AF free at 3 months as analysed per Kaplan-Meier format
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Boon Lim, Imperial College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15HH2466

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Subscribe